search for: altaphon

Displaying 16 results from an estimated 16 matches for "altaphon".

2005 Feb 15
2
Re: X100P problems
...reflect changes made in zaptel and zapata.conf entries. Any other config files that it doesn't reload? >From: "Asterisk@Home" <asteriskathome@yahoo.com> > >Did you go into AMP and configure some place for >incomming calls to go? > >--- David Josephson <dlj@altaphon.com> wrote: > > > >>Is there a configuration difference for clone X100P >>cards versus >>"compatible"? I have a similar problem to what David >>Shaw posted earlier >> >> > >
2005 Feb 15
1
More *@Home puzzle
Is there a configuration difference for clone X100P cards versus "compatible"? I have a similar problem to what David Shaw posted earlier today. 0.5 installed OK, but mine just with one X100P clone. Default config files, edited zapata.conf per the FAQs so it includes the line channel => 1 without the semicolon. Any outgoing call attempt returns "all circuits are busy"
2005 Feb 08
0
Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 7, Issue 113
Steve Blair writes > I can redirect and relay calls to numerous destinations via >SER but because the Octel needs an SMDI interface for mailbox >identification I am stuck, none of the solutions thus far support >SMDI-SIP munging. > > I just started thinking about the possibility of using Asterisk >with a few FXS cards to provide the gateway between SIP and >the Octel.
2005 Feb 14
0
Re: card dialer phone
Rob at draughon.org writes > I recently obtained a Western Electric multi-line phone and am >seeking help with getting this beast working with *. > > The interesting stuff in my * implementation consists of a T100P >card, a TDM400P card, and an Adtran TA750 channel bank with three quad-port >FXS modules and a quad-port FXO. The TA750 is wired to a 24-port Cat 5 patch >panel
2005 Feb 24
0
Re: Radio over *
Pete VK2YX writes > I've been involved with IRLP for about 5 years and am one of the original > install team. I've gone through the emmotions of allowing "other" networks > connect to IRLP and I know its caused some lots of headache. > > As far as a closed network goes, yes there is LOTS of passion to keep it HAM > only and I'd have to support that notion.
2005 Feb 25
1
Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 7, Issue 304
Daniel Nystrom wrote > It seems like the Radio discussions is closing in on something I was > interested in. > How about controlling 30 2-way radios via E1 and 30-channel "Mux" > (channel bank?) with E&M signalling? > I think the Mux uses CAS and each channel has Audio out, PTT, Audio > IN, Busy. 6-wire connection i guess? > That should be a really nice setup
2005 Mar 16
0
Obscure * command and audio questions
A few bits and pieces that I hope someone here has answers for. Basically, I'm in the audio business and I hope to get better control of the audio performance in *. 1. I seem to recall seeing a tonelist parameter that allowed tones to be set at levels other than 0, for instance !1000/500@-20 would generate 1 kHz for half a second at -20 dBm0. But this doesn't work and I can't
2005 Mar 17
0
Message waiting/station busy conflict?
Greetings list, We are having a puzzle with * (asteriskathome 0.5) and SIP phones (SPA2000 ATA's). If callwaiting is enabled, everything (including call waiting) is normal. If callwaiting is turned off, the phone will not accept incoming calls and the call goes straight to whatever is programmed for the busy voicemail response. It doesn't matter whether reinvite is on or off, or
2005 Mar 25
0
Re: Square key KTS app on *
On Fri, 2005-03-25 at 08:00 -0800, Mark W Wood wrote: > > I have searched both the wiki and googled looking for a solution to > > a square key configuration. I need to have C.O. lines to appear on > > the buttons to facilitate a small office. All of the users can see > > each other and calls are put on hold and picked up by the other > > users instead of transferred.
2005 Mar 25
0
Re: Asterisk-Users Digest, Vol 8, Issue 216
>> >> >>Can I program a specific C.O. line directly to a button? >> >> Adopting the Critchfield style for a moment, no, *you* probably can't. But, depending on one's expertise with the hardware and Asterisk, it can certainly be done. I am by no means an Asterisk expert but have about 35 years of random phone experience. I have an ancient Siemens HiNet
2007 Apr 28
0
app_dictate problems
Has no one else experienced the problem I mentioned a few days ago with app_dictate? Or maybe no one is using that app. We're having a problem with choppy audio and failure of the accelerated playback feature which seems to be consistent on a couple of installs, failing with some SIP carriers and working fine with others. MOH and other audio playback features seem to work fine. What's
2005 Jan 09
2
E&M trunk card?
Has anyone found an inexpensive E&M trunk card that will play with *? Looking for an interface to a legacy electromechanical PBX that's able to pass answer supervision. Docs on the X100P card would be helpful, we could probably pull E&M out of that. Any ideas?
2005 Feb 26
0
Re: FRS over *
On the various technical issues raised here (OK, we posted the rules, we won't discuss the legality anymore) I think there is only one main obstacle to using FRS radios for extensions on *. They are simplex (push-to-talk, release-to-listen). The protocol for dealing with voice-activated-switching (VOX) has been used in ham and public safety simplex autopatches but it's really tricky
2005 Mar 25
2
Multiple outgoing calls through VOIP providers
Trying to get some straight info from the VOIP providers is difficult. Say there's a small Asterisk switch and it's registered with Broadvoice or LiveVOIP or someone. There are a couple of people using the switch, one is on an outgoing call with the VOIP provider. What happens when someone else initiates another outgoing call through that provider on the same SIP registry? Does * know
2005 Feb 24
1
Re: FRS and GMRS via *
You don't need to reinvent anything to tie radios to *. Ham systems like IRLP, Echolink, eqso etc all have fairly tight controls to keep from being abused (although with a little Linux knowledge, the IRLP package can easily be used to set up your own network using their protocol). Jim Dixon seems to have done the work to integrate radios with * already. See
2005 Feb 25
1
Re: FRS radios on *
Rich Adamson writes >>GMRS, FRS and MURS radios may not be interconnected with the PSTN (47 > > CFR 95.141). There has been a lot of talk from lobbyists to clarify this > > rule, but as it stands you could conceivably connect a *private* network > > to GMRS or MURS radios (you can't make any plugins or modifications to > > an FRS radio that isn't type