search for: alignednontemporalstor

Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "alignednontemporalstor".

2010 Feb 15
4
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...se you broke the encoding of an instruction in your >> patch. This is incorrect: >> >> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst, >> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", >> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src), >> addr:$dst)]>; >> >> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases. > > I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot and it > looked like it failed before I ever applied anything. Apo...
2010 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...I reverted it in r96265. FWIW, this is because you broke the encoding of an instruction in your patch. This is incorrect: +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst, VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src), addr:$dst)]>; Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases. -Chris
2010 Feb 15
3
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...ion in your >>>> patch. This is incorrect: >>>> >>>> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst, >>>> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", >>>> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src), >>>> addr:$dst)]>; >>>> >>>> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases. >>> >>> I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot >>> and it looked like...
2010 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...g of an instruction in your > >> patch. This is incorrect: > >> > >> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst, > >> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", > >> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src), > >> addr:$dst)]>; > >> > >> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases. > > > > I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot > > and it looked like it failed before I...
2010 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...; FWIW, this is because you broke the encoding of an instruction in your > patch. This is incorrect: > > +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst, > VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", > + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src), > addr:$dst)]>; > > Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases. I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot and it looked like it failed before I ever applied anything. Apologies for the mix- up....
2010 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...;>> patch. This is incorrect: > >>>> > >>>> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst, > >>>> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", > >>>> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src), > >>>> addr:$dst)]>; > >>>> > >>>> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases. > >>> > >>> I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot > &gt...
2010 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
On Monday 15 February 2010 11:54:25 Óscar Fuentes wrote: > David Greene <dag at cray.com> writes: > > Sorry, I botched a commit and broke the build. I've just committed a > > fix. > > > > So expect to see some buildbot churning. > > Don't hurry. A buildbot already decided that I am the only culprit of > the breakage. :-/ Hmm...given that
2010 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:00 AM, David Greene wrote: > On Monday 15 February 2010 11:54:25 Óscar Fuentes wrote: >> David Greene <dag at cray.com> writes: >>> Sorry, I botched a commit and broke the build. I've just committed a >>> fix. >>> >>> So expect to see some buildbot churning. >> >> Don't hurry. A buildbot already
2010 Feb 15
1
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...ion in your >>>> patch. This is incorrect: >>>> >>>> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst, >>>> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}", >>>> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src), >>>> addr:$dst)]>; >>>> >>>> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases. >>> >>> I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot >>> and it looked like...