Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "alignednontemporalstore".
2010 Feb 15
4
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...se you broke the encoding of an instruction in your
>> patch. This is incorrect:
>>
>> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst,
>> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
>> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src),
>> addr:$dst)]>;
>>
>> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases.
>
> I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot and it
> looked like it failed before I ever applied anything. Apol...
2010 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...I reverted it in r96265.
FWIW, this is because you broke the encoding of an instruction in your patch. This is incorrect:
+def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst, VR128:$src),
+ "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
+ [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src), addr:$dst)]>;
Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases.
-Chris
2010 Feb 15
3
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...ion in your
>>>> patch. This is incorrect:
>>>>
>>>> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst,
>>>> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
>>>> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src),
>>>> addr:$dst)]>;
>>>>
>>>> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases.
>>>
>>> I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot
>>> and it looked like...
2010 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...g of an instruction in your
> >> patch. This is incorrect:
> >>
> >> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst,
> >> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
> >> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src),
> >> addr:$dst)]>;
> >>
> >> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases.
> >
> > I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot
> > and it looked like it failed before I e...
2010 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...; FWIW, this is because you broke the encoding of an instruction in your
> patch. This is incorrect:
>
> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst,
> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src),
> addr:$dst)]>;
>
> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases.
I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot and it
looked like it failed before I ever applied anything. Apologies for the mix-
up....
2010 Feb 16
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...;>> patch. This is incorrect:
> >>>>
> >>>> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst,
> >>>> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
> >>>> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src),
> >>>> addr:$dst)]>;
> >>>>
> >>>> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases.
> >>>
> >>> I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot
> >...
2010 Feb 15
2
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
On Monday 15 February 2010 11:54:25 Óscar Fuentes wrote:
> David Greene <dag at cray.com> writes:
> > Sorry, I botched a commit and broke the build. I've just committed a
> > fix.
> >
> > So expect to see some buildbot churning.
>
> Don't hurry. A buildbot already decided that I am the only culprit of
> the breakage. :-/
Hmm...given that
2010 Feb 15
0
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
On Feb 15, 2010, at 10:00 AM, David Greene wrote:
> On Monday 15 February 2010 11:54:25 Óscar Fuentes wrote:
>> David Greene <dag at cray.com> writes:
>>> Sorry, I botched a commit and broke the build. I've just committed a
>>> fix.
>>>
>>> So expect to see some buildbot churning.
>>
>> Don't hurry. A buildbot already
2010 Feb 15
1
[LLVMdev] Botched Build
...ion in your
>>>> patch. This is incorrect:
>>>>
>>>> +def MOVNTDQ_64mr : PSI<0xE7, MRMDestMem, (outs), (ins f128mem:$dst,
>>>> VR128:$src), + "movntdq\t{$src, $dst|$dst, $src}",
>>>> + [(alignednontemporalstore (v2f64 VR128:$src),
>>>> addr:$dst)]>;
>>>>
>>>> Please don't check in patches when you know that they break testcases.
>>>
>>> I certainly didn't know it broke anything. I even checked the buildbot
>>> and it looked like...