search for: ahs

Dear all, I would like to know which is the right way to check the normality assumption for performing ANOVA. How do you check normality for the following example? I did an experiment where people had to evaluate on a 7 point scale, the degree of realism of some stimuli presented in 2 conditions. The problem is that if I check normality with the Shapiro test I get that the data are not

Dear all, I need an help because I don´t know how to perform the analysis in the right way, as I get different beheaviors using t-test and two ways ANOVA. In what follow I post the table, my goal and the strange results I got. I kindly ask you an help because I really don´t know how to solve this problem. So the table is this: number stimulus condition response 1

R-philes, I have a question about displaying counts of unused factors using the table() function. I have two vectors with character data in them: local.labels("ah", "ah", "ah~") local.preds("ah", "ah", "ah") If I use the table function as shown below, I get an error because the number of levels do not match up. v.cont.table <-

I''m attempting to setup Squid as shown on: http://shorewall.sourceforge.net/Shorewall_Squid_Usage.html#DMZ The firewall is a Bering 1.0 firewall running Shorewall 1.3.11, Red Hat 7.2 on the server in the DMZ. I''m not seeing the requests come in to the server using tcpdump. The server is 192.168.2.1 connecting to eth2 on the firewall, the local traffic I''m trying to

Dear R people Could you please help. Basically, there are two variables in my data set. Each patient ('id') may have one or more diseases ('diagnosis'). It looks like id diagnosis 1 ah 2 ah 2 ihd 2 im 3 ah 3 stroke 4 ah 4 ihd 4 angina 5 ihd .............. Q: How to make three data sets: 1. Patients with ah and ihd 2. Patients with ah but no ihd 3. Patients with ihd but no

Hello all, I am trying to install R 1.3.0 on SGI IRIX. I downloaded the .tar from CRAN, unpacked it and executed the following commands from the top level directory: ./configure make The ./configure completes OK, with the final summary output: -------------------- R is now configured for mips-sgi-irix6.5 Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr/local C compiler:

...ts.netfilter.org ReportedBy: saltyacid at gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Found on version 1.4.19.1 and concerns both iptables and ip6tables. How to use -m ah is described here: http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO/netfilter-extensions-HOWTO-6.html # ip6tables -A INPUT -m ah --ahspi 500 -j DROP # ip6tables --list Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT) target prot opt source destination DROP all anywhere anywhere ah spi:500 However, ignoring the optional argument --ahspi gives a check that we match SPI=0 (I would think that...

Hi folks, I've been working on getting my WiFi network running with IPsec. I'm at the point where all traffic on the wifi subnet is encrypted (i.e. ESP). Then I tried to add AH to the equation. I failed. This picture describes the network setup: http://beta.freebsddiary.org/images/ipsec-wireless.gif Here's what I'm trying and failing with. With these rules, I get no

Hello. I try to migrate dovecot 1 to dovecot 2 with doveadm backup. But when i try to set doveadm backup i get : mx3:/root/dsync@[23:11] # doveadm -v -c ah.temp backup -R -u ah at test.pl <ahuryn at i-pi.pl> imapc: doveadm(ah at test.pl <ahuryn at i-pi.pl>): Error: Mail access for users with UID 145 not permitted (see first_valid_uid in config file, uid from userdb lookup). doveadm(ah

I'm trying to see how the x86 backend deals with the relationship between AL, AH and AX, but I can't get it to generate any code that would expose an interesting scenario. For example, I wrote this piece: typedef struct { char x, y; } struct_t; struct_t z; struct_t foo(char *p) { struct_t s; s.x = *p++; s.y = *p; z = s; s.x++; return s; } But the output at -O2

Try using x86 mode rather than Intel64 mode. I have definitely gotten it to use both ah and al in 32 bit x86 code generation. In particular, I have seen that in loops for both the spec2000 and spec2006 versions of bzip. It can happen, but it does only rarely. Kevin Smith >-----Original Message----- >From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of >Krzysztof

On several variants of x86 processors, mixing `ah`, `al` and `ax` as source/destination in the same dependency chain will have some penalties, so for THOSE processors, there is a benefit to NOT use `al` and `ah` to reflect parts of `ax` - I believe this is caused by the fact that the processor doesn't ACTUALLY see these as parts of a bigger register internally, and will execute two independent

Then let me shift focus from performance to size. With either optsize or minsize, the output is still the same. As per the subject, I'm not really interested in the quality of the final code, but in the way that the x86 target deals with the structural relationship between these registers. Specifically, I'd like to see if it would generate implicit defs/uses for AX on defs/uses of

My laptop's kernel config file reads: device wlan # 802.11 support device ath device ath_ar5212 device ath_rate_onoe Config raises no objections and the compilation succeeds, but linking the kernel breaks: ... linking kernel.debug ah.o(.text+0x218): In function `ath_hal_rfprobe':

Hi, Could you use "MIR" to forge the example you're looking for? -- Mehdi > On May 24, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Then let me shift focus from performance to size. With either optsize or minsize, the output is still the same. > > As per the subject, I'm not really interested in the

Dear users, I am attempting to plot an ols() call from the Design package, by following the procedure explained by Harald Baayen in his 2008 book 'Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R', page 175-181. I've attached my data to this e-mail (I hope it's small enough that that's ok). First I paste all the commands I ran, followed by the

In Syslinux-5.00, is the goal that the core and .c32 modules alike will use the same heap? There is a bug I am thinking about: - QEmu with 1024 MiB RAM - Syslinux 4.06 - .c32 can realloc() up to 1013 MiB - QEmu with 1024 MiB RAM - Syslinux 5.00-pre9 - .c32 can realloc() up to 45 MiB I am wondering if there's a maximum-allocation-size being hit, or if it's actually a bug I should look

Thanks Kevin. This isn't exactly what I'm looking for, though. The ECX is explicitly defined here and CL/CH are only used. I was interested in the opposite situation---where the sub-registers are defined separately and then the super-register is used as a whole. Hopefully the sub-register liveness tracking is what I need, so the questions about x86 may become moot. -Krzysztof

Here's some of the generated code from the current community head for bzip2.c from spec 256.bzip2, with these options: clang -m32 -S -O2 bzip2.c .LBB14_4: # %bsW.exit24 subl %eax, %ebx addl $8, %eax movl %ebx, %ecx movl %eax, bsLive shll %cl, %edi movl %ebp, %ecx orl %esi, %edi

Dear All, I have a problem in understanding how the interactions of 2 ways ANOVA work, because I get conflicting results from a t-test and an anova. For most of you my problem is very simple I am sure. I need an help with an example, looking at one table I am analyzing. The table is in attachment and can be imported in R by means of this command: scrd<-