search for: ah

...11 flat_550_W_realism A 5 12 flat_550_W_realism A 7 13 flat_550_W_realism A 5 14 flat_550_W_realism A 2 15 flat_550_W_realism A 3 16 flat_550_W_realism AH 7 17 flat_550_W_realism AH 4 18 flat_550_W_realism AH 5 19 flat_550_W_realism AH 3 20 flat_550_W_realism AH 6 21 flat_550_W_realism AH 5 22 flat_550_W_reali...

...11 flat_550_W_realism A 5 12 flat_550_W_realism A 7 13 flat_550_W_realism A 5 14 flat_550_W_realism A 2 15 flat_550_W_realism A 3 16 flat_550_W_realism AH 7 17 flat_550_W_realism AH 4 18 flat_550_W_realism AH 5 19 flat_550_W_realism AH 3 20 flat_550_W_realism AH 6 21 flat_550_W_realism AH 5 22 flat_550_W_reali...

R-philes, I have a question about displaying counts of unused factors using the table() function. I have two vectors with character data in them: local.labels("ah", "ah", "ah~") local.preds("ah", "ah", "ah") If I use the table function as shown below, I get an error because the number of levels do not match up. v.cont.table <- table(local.labels, local.preds, dnn=c("observed", "pr...

...t 80 -j MARK --set-mark 202 Shorewall-1.3.11 Status at firewall - Fri Mar 28 11:17:23 UTC 2003 Counters reset Fri Mar 28 11:17:03 UTC 2003 Chain INPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 32 2688 ACCEPT ah -- lo * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 22 3068 eth0_in ah -- eth0 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 105 8004 eth1_in ah -- eth1 * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 1 230 eth2_in ah -- eth2 * 0.0.0.0/0...

Dear R people Could you please help. Basically, there are two variables in my data set. Each patient ('id') may have one or more diseases ('diagnosis'). It looks like id diagnosis 1 ah 2 ah 2 ihd 2 im 3 ah 3 stroke 4 ah 4 ihd 4 angina 5 ihd .............. Q: How to make three data sets: 1. Patients with ah and ihd 2. Patients with ah but no ihd 3. Patients with ihd but no ah? If you have any ideas could just guide what should I look for. Is a subset or aggregate, or loops,...

Hello all, I am trying to install R 1.3.0 on SGI IRIX. I downloaded the .tar from CRAN, unpacked it and executed the following commands from the top level directory: ./configure make The ./configure completes OK, with the final summary output: -------------------- R is now configured for mips-sgi-irix6.5 Source directory: . Installation directory: /usr/local C compiler:

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904 Summary: Matching ah without optional argument gives unintuitive result Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: arm OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: iptables...

Hi folks, I've been working on getting my WiFi network running with IPsec. I'm at the point where all traffic on the wifi subnet is encrypted (i.e. ESP). Then I tried to add AH to the equation. I failed. This picture describes the network setup: http://beta.freebsddiary.org/images/ipsec-wireless.gif Here's what I'm trying and failing with. With these rules, I get no comms between the laptop and the gateway. If I remove the "ah/tunnel/..." claus...

Hello. I try to migrate dovecot 1 to dovecot 2 with doveadm backup. But when i try to set doveadm backup i get : mx3:/root/dsync@[23:11] # doveadm -v -c ah.temp backup -R -u ah at test.pl <ahuryn at i-pi.pl> imapc: doveadm(ah at test.pl <ahuryn at i-pi.pl>): Error: Mail access for users with UID 145 not permitted (see first_valid_uid in config file, uid from userdb lookup). doveadm(ah at test.pl <ahuryn at i-pi.pl>): Error: User init...

I'm trying to see how the x86 backend deals with the relationship between AL, AH and AX, but I can't get it to generate any code that would expose an interesting scenario. For example, I wrote this piece: typedef struct { char x, y; } struct_t; struct_t z; struct_t foo(char *p) { struct_t s; s.x = *p++; s.y = *p; z = s; s.x++; return s; } But the...

Try using x86 mode rather than Intel64 mode. I have definitely gotten it to use both ah and al in 32 bit x86 code generation. In particular, I have seen that in loops for both the spec2000 and spec2006 versions of bzip. It can happen, but it does only rarely. Kevin Smith >-----Original Message----- >From: llvm-dev [mailto:llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of >K...

On several variants of x86 processors, mixing `ah`, `al` and `ax` as source/destination in the same dependency chain will have some penalties, so for THOSE processors, there is a benefit to NOT use `al` and `ah` to reflect parts of `ax` - I believe this is caused by the fact that the processor doesn't ACTUALLY see these as parts of a bigger re...

...till the same. As per the subject, I'm not really interested in the quality of the final code, but in the way that the x86 target deals with the structural relationship between these registers. Specifically, I'd like to see if it would generate implicit defs/uses for AX on defs/uses of AH/AL. I looked in the X86 sources and I didn't find code that would make me certain, but I'm not too familiar with that backend. Having a testcase to work with would make it a lot easier for me. -Krzysztof On 5/24/2016 12:03 PM, mats petersson wrote: > On several variants of x86 pr...

...;s kernel config file reads: device wlan # 802.11 support device ath device ath_ar5212 device ath_rate_onoe Config raises no objections and the compilation succeeds, but linking the kernel breaks: ... linking kernel.debug ah.o(.text+0x218): In function `ath_hal_rfprobe': /home/mi/src/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal/ah.c:142: undefined reference to `__start_set_ah_rfs' ah.o(.text+0x21d):/home/mi/src/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal/ah.c:142: undefined reference to `__stop_set_ah_rfs' ah.o(.text+0x236):/home/mi/sr...

...e same. > > As per the subject, I'm not really interested in the quality of the final code, but in the way that the x86 target deals with the structural relationship between these registers. Specifically, I'd like to see if it would generate implicit defs/uses for AX on defs/uses of AH/AL. I looked in the X86 sources and I didn't find code that would make me certain, but I'm not too familiar with that backend. Having a testcase to work with would make it a lot easier for me. > > -Krzysztof > > > On 5/24/2016 12:03 PM, mats petersson wrote: >> On...

...sak s low unround back long 12022 1 AF 38 1 sak s low unround back long 12022 0 AF 38 2 sak s low unround back long 12022 1 AF 38 3 sak s low unround back long 12022 0 AF 38 4 sak s low unround back long 12022 0 AF 38 5 sak s low unround back long 12022 0 AF 38 6 sak s low unround back long 12022 0 AH 22 1 sak s low unround back long 12022 1 AH 22 2 sak s low unround back long 12022 1 AH 22 3 sak s low unround back long 12022 1 AH 22 4 sak s low unround back long 12022 1 AH 22 5 sak s low unround back long 12022 1 AH 22 6 sak s low unround back long 12022 1 AH 24 1 sak s low unround back long 12...

In Syslinux-5.00, is the goal that the core and .c32 modules alike will use the same heap? There is a bug I am thinking about: - QEmu with 1024 MiB RAM - Syslinux 4.06 - .c32 can realloc() up to 1013 MiB - QEmu with 1024 MiB RAM - Syslinux 5.00-pre9 - .c32 can realloc() up to 45 MiB I am wondering if there's a maximum-allocation-size being hit, or if it's actually a bug I should look

...t: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 1:03 PM >> To: Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> >> Cc: mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com>; Smith, Kevin B >> <kevin.b.smith at intel.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend >> >> Hi, >> >> Could you use "MIR" to forge the example you're looking for? >> >> -- >> Mehdi >> >> >>> On May 24, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm- >> dev at lists....

...t apple.com] >Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2016 1:03 PM >To: Krzysztof Parzyszek <kparzysz at codeaurora.org> >Cc: mats petersson <mats at planetcatfish.com>; Smith, Kevin B ><kevin.b.smith at intel.com>; llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Liveness of AL, AH and AX in x86 backend > >Hi, > >Could you use "MIR" to forge the example you're looking for? > >-- >Mehdi > > >> On May 24, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm- >dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Then let me...

...)) This table is the result of a simple experiment. Subjects where exposed to some stimuli and they where asked to evaluate the degree of realism of the stimuli on a 7 point scale (i.e., data in column "response"). Each stimulus was presented in two conditions, "A" and "AH", where AH is the condition A plus another thing (let?s call it "H"). Now, what means exactly in my table the interaction stimulus:condition? I think that if I do the analysis anova(response ~ stimulus*condition) I will get the comparison between the same stimulus in condition...