search for: aggrs

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 54 matches for "aggrs".

Did you mean: aggr
2016 Nov 16
3
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
Hi, Thanks for the quick feedback. I see your points, but I have a few questions/comments. I'll start at the end of the previous post: > ... > I think these are valuable problems to solve, but you should tackle them piece by piece: > > 1) the clang part of overriding the individual FMF and emitting the right IR is the first thing to fix. > 2) the backend is still using the
2009 Oct 12
1
List mappings and variable creation
Hi All, I have a questions about associative list mappings in R, and if they are possible? I have data in the form show below, and want to make a new 'bucket' variable called combined. Which is the sum of the control and the exposed metric values This combined variable is a many to many matching as values only appear in the file if they have a value > 0. conversion.type filteredID
2009 Jun 12
6
Duplicate packets when using aggregate datalinks on bge
I opened a bug report earlier today but it doesn''t seem to have been added to the bugs database. I''m posting here in case one of the Crossbow developers might see it and confirm this behavior. Description Duplicate packets are generated whenever an aggregate is introduced into the network configuration. We''ve ruled out switch ports and physical bge interfaces as
2016 Nov 17
4
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
I don’t really like the idea of updating checks of UnsafeAlgebra() to depend on all of the other flags. It seems like it would be preferable to look at each optimization and figure out which flags it actually requires. I suspect that in many cases the “new” flag (i.e. allowing reassociation, etc.) will be what is actually needed anyway. I would be inclined to agree with Niolai’s suggestion of
2016 Nov 17
2
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > ... except that Warren’s proposal that started this discussion seems to imply that he > > has a use case that requires reciprocals to be turned off separately. > > Just to close this loose end, yes I have a use case. > > Specifically, we have a customer that turns on
2009 Apr 10
13
property parsing in dladm
...ted (by me, at least) do_create_vnic *linkprop functions. What happened here? Why do we pass in property lists for aggr and vlan creation? Even more confusing is the fact that the dladm usage string (emitted when one types dladm with no args) does not have any hint of the -p option for vlans and aggrs. At least that, needs to be fixed! --Sowmini
2008 Jan 30
2
vnic on top of aggr of 2 x 1 Gbit/s NICs
Hi, Can you tell why my vnic built on top of an aggregation of 2 NICs of 1 Gbit/s doesn''t report a speed of 2 GBit/s ? [root at nazgul /]# dladm show-dev bge0 link: up speed: 1000Mb duplex: full bge1 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge2 link: down speed: 0Mb duplex: unknown bge3 link: down speed: 0Mb
2008 May 09
2
Tabulation of aggregated data.frame
Hi useRs! I would like to know how to make aggregated data.frame with aggregate() tabulated. For example, I run the following command to aggregate re with respect to group1 and group2. > (aggr <- with(final, aggregate(re, group1, group2, mean))) Group.1 Group.2 x 1 1992 15 0.16392 2 1993 15 0.15467 3 1994 15 0.15456 4 1995 15 0.15391
2009 Jan 14
0
Sol 10 U5 panic on removing device from aggr during scp copy files
OS: Solaris 10 5/08 s10s_u5wos_10 Sol 10 U5 panic on removing device from aggr during scp copy files For some reason, I can not get the dump file out of the server. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
2000 Mar 31
1
R: one bananna aov() question
Hello world, I'm trying to do an anova on data in data.set, dependent variable is a column named "dep.var", grouping variable is in a column called "indep.var", and is.factor(indep.var) is TRUE... why can't I just do aov(dep.var ~ indep.var, data = data.set)? What have I done to deserve this?! What gives? Am I missing something totlly obvious? R-base-1.0.0-1,
2016 Nov 17
4
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
> On Nov 16, 2016, at 10:04 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: > > > Can you elaborate what kind of runtime failure is the reciprocal transformation triggering? > > Yes. It was along the lines of: > > { > float x = a / c; > float y = b / c; > > if (y == 1.0f) { > // do some processing for when
2016 Nov 17
3
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
>All that said, I think we (the company I work for, Sony) will have to implement support >for these switches. It comes down to GCC has these switches (e.g., -fno-reciprocal-math >and -fno-associative-math), and they do suppress the transformations for our customers. >They switch to Clang/LLVM, they use the same switches, and it doesn't "work". So as a >practical
2006 Apr 07
1
Aggregating an its series
I'm using a very long irregular time-series of air temperature and relative humidity of this kind (this is an extract only) its.format("% Y%d%m %X) > base T H 20020601 12.00.00 27.1 47 20020601 15.00.00 29.1 39 20020601 18.00.00 27.4 39 20020601 21.00.00 24.0 40 20020602 0.00.00 22.0 73 20020602 3.00.00 19.2 49 20020602 6.00.00 19.5 74 20020602
2016 Nov 17
2
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. From Mehdi: > Hope this clarify where I see the direction going, and even if you don’t agree with my > reasoning, the conclusion should be satisfactory on your side :) I'd say that summarizes my thoughts on this well. And from Nicolai: > Right. I'm not fundamentally opposed to having these
2016 Nov 17
2
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> >> On Nov 17, 2016, at 1:24 PM, Ristow, Warren <warren.ristow at sony.com> wrote: >> >> On the plus side, I'm glad to see the conclusions of the last couple of posts. >> >> From Mehdi: >> >>> Hope this clarify where I see the
2012 Oct 19
4
Creating a new by variable in a dataframe
Hello, I have a dataframe w/ 3 variables of interest: transaction,date(tdate) & time(event_tim). How could I create a 4th variable (last_trans) that would flag the last transaction of the day for each day? In SAS I use: proc sort data=all6; by tdate event_tim; run; /*Create last transaction flag per day*/ data all6; set all6; by tdate event_tim; last_trans=last.tdate; Thanks
2016 Nov 16
3
RFC: Consider changing the semantics of 'fast' flag implying all fast-math-flags
Hi all, This is about https://reviews.llvm.org/D26708 Currently when the command-line switch '-ffast-math' is specified, the IR-level fast-math-flag 'fast' gets attached to appropriate FP math instructions. That flag acts as an "umbrella" to implicitly turn on all the other fast-math-flags ('nnan', 'ninf', 'nsz' and 'arcp'):
2009 Apr 17
10
Virtual devices disappear in dladm show-link
Using OpenSolaris 2008.11 build 110. Created vnic''s and etherstub''s and they are displayed using dladm show-links but when the server is rebooted a ''dladm show-link'' is empty although the vnic and etherstub devices are still there and function properly. That is a real inconvenience, so why do the no longer show after a reboot or shutdown/start? Is there a
2008 Dec 05
0
resync onnv_105 partial for 6713916
Author: Darren Moffat <Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM> Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Latest revision: 957d30a3607ed9f3cbe490da5894d1e1b2104033 Total changesets: 28 Log message: resync onnv_105 partial for 6713916 Files: usr/src/Makefile.lint usr/src/Targetdirs usr/src/cmd/Makefile usr/src/cmd/Makefile.cmd usr/src/cmd/acctadm/Makefile usr/src/cmd/acctadm/acctadm.xcl
2006 Apr 09
0
(IT WAS) Aggregating an its series
Just strip off the hours component of the dates, then take a subset of the data where the hour is <= 12. I did not execute this, so you might need to change it a bit: hours <- as.integer(format(dates(base),"%H")) new.data <- base[hours <= 12,] aggregate(new.data,by=list(as.factor(format(dates(new.data),"%Y%m%d"))),mean,na.rm=T) -----Original Message-----