search for: afoot

...ello, I don't see why you say that the documentation seems to be wrong: class(args(`+`)) #[1] "function" args() on a primitive does return a closure. At least in this case it does. Rui Barradas ?s 14:05 de 07/10/2018, Peter Dalgaard escreveu: > There is more "fun" afoot here, but I don't recall what the point may be: > >> args(get("+")) > function (e1, e2) > NULL >> args(get("[")) > NULL >> get("[") > .Primitive("[") >> get("+") > function (e1, e2) .Primitive("+&...

...does this mean? Looking on the box where the remote files where to be copied to, i found the root file system full. I know the copy was attempted, but just making some observations, does this code mean that the copy could not be completed. Obviously this is not a 0,0 status so i know something is afoot. Looking at time/date stamps on the files i see the old versions not the new ones. Another error code i got was 3072 which was from an scp command that ran through rsync. What does this mean? Ambitiously, is there a detailed list of error codes and what they mean? I would like to be able to have...

...ith the rest of the code and not worry about this for now. However, every time we launch the application and it requests the ssh password via either ssh-askpass or gnome-ssh-askpass or x11-ssh-askpass, we receive errors about "could not grab keyboard" and hints that there might be malice afoot. What is causing this error and how to we go about eliminating it? Thanks - John Sullivan -- John A. Sullivan III Chief Technology Officer Nexus Management +1 207-985-7880 john.sullivan at nexusmgmt.com --- If you are interested in helping to develop a GPL enterprise class VPN/Firewall/Security d...

I've configured a secondary slave nameserver based on what I consider rather expert advice, but it's not working as expected. I'm trying to determine if I've done something wrong with basic configuration or if there are AD/DC nuances afoot. The main nameserver is the domain Active Directory/Domain Controller running Samba 4.4.16 on Slackware64 14.2. This has been running for a few years w/o problem. It's domain IP is 192.168.0.2. I've attempted to configure a DNS slave on another Linux Slackware64 14.2 system, IP 192.168.0....

I am trying to understand Suspend 2 and what I have to do to get it working in Centos 5. There is quite a bit for it at ATrpms: http://www.atrpms.net/dist/el5/hibernate-suspend2/ http://www.atrpms.net/dist/el5/kernel-suspend2/ The later is the kernel patches that they refer to at the Suspend2 website, so I don't have to recompile the kernel? I noticed that over at:

Hello, Is there some Rails 3.0.6 ETA? I am asking because there are some security holes in Rails 3.0.3, which are currently available in Fedora 15. So is it right time to update Rails to 3.0.5 or is it worth of waiting for 3.0.6? Vit -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to

...t; > Or, for that matter: > >> is.primitive(`[`) > [1] TRUE >> class(args(`[`)) > [1] "NULL" > > -pd > >> >> >> Rui Barradas >> >> ?s 14:05 de 07/10/2018, Peter Dalgaard escreveu: >>> There is more "fun" afoot here, but I don't recall what the point may be: >>>> args(get("+")) >>> function (e1, e2) >>> NULL >>>> args(get("[")) >>> NULL >>>> get("[") >>> .Primitive("[") >>>> get(...

...s NOT related to cell phones or other programs trying to repeatedly authenticate. For one thing, I have no cell phone or remote mail client accessing this domain. Also, I send an email notice for EVERY failed domain login attempt. There are no such failures in the samba log. I think there is a bug afoot. I would be happy to try any tests anyone might suggest. --Mark Samba 4.4.16

Hi, A short code example showing the warning might the only thing needed here: ``` > formals(args(`[`)) NULL *Warning message:In formals(fun) : argument is not a function* > is.function(`[`) [1] TRUE > is.primitive(`[`) [1] TRUE ``` Now with an other primitive: ``` > formals(args(`sum`)) $... $na.rm [1] FALSE > is.function(`sum`) [1] TRUE > is.primitive(`sum`) [1] TRUE

Dear all, I just stumbled over the following instruction in the LLVM IR of a C program compiled with clang: %26 = call i32 (...)* bitcast (i32 (i32, i32, i32, i32, i32)* @KeWaitForSingleObject to i32 (...)*)(i32 %23, i32 %24, i32 %25, i32 0, i32 0) Since our LLVM Parser choked on this instruction, I tried to check the documentation, but did not find anything about such nested bitcasts within

I realise this is not directly related to the topic but if changes are afoot would it be possible to make the use of any sort of news or changelog more prominent in the documentation? I maintain one of the CRAN task views and when someone updates his/her package it is much, much easier for me to see what has happened and if I need to update the text if they supply a new...

...s NOT related to cell phones or other programs trying to repeatedly authenticate. For one thing, I have no cell phone or remote mail client accessing this domain. Also, I send an email notice for EVERY failed domain login attempt. There are no such failures in the samba log. I think there is a bug afoot. I would be happy to try any tests anyone might suggest. --Mark Samba 4.4.16 6 hours Later ... After resetting to a different password using samba-tool as domain administrator from the AD server 6 hours ago, and being able to successfully log in, I find myself locked out AGAIN! I need a way to...

There is more "fun" afoot here, but I don't recall what the point may be: > args(get("+")) function (e1, e2) NULL > args(get("[")) NULL > get("[") .Primitive("[") > get("+") function (e1, e2) .Primitive("+") The other index operators, "[[&q...

...seems to be wrong: > > > class(args(`+`)) > #[1] "function" > > > args() on a primitive does return a closure. At least in this case it does. > > > Rui Barradas > > ?s 14:05 de 07/10/2018, Peter Dalgaard escreveu: > > There is more "fun" afoot here, but I don't recall what the point may be: > > > >> args(get("+")) > > function (e1, e2) > > NULL > >> args(get("[")) > > NULL > >> get("[") > > .Primitive("[") > >> get("+")...

...[1] TRUE > class(args(get("["))) [1] "NULL" Or, for that matter: > is.primitive(`[`) [1] TRUE > class(args(`[`)) [1] "NULL" -pd > > > Rui Barradas > > ?s 14:05 de 07/10/2018, Peter Dalgaard escreveu: >> There is more "fun" afoot here, but I don't recall what the point may be: >>> args(get("+")) >> function (e1, e2) >> NULL >>> args(get("[")) >> NULL >>> get("[") >> .Primitive("[") >>> get("+") >> function...

...ux file system events with inotify.", see http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-inotify.html?ca=dgr-lnxw02Inotify. I notice that /dev/inotify is not present on my CentOS4 system, so the necessary kernel patches are probably not present. Does anyone know if there are any plans afoot to provide this functionality for rhel systems? -- Collins When I saw the Iraqi people voting three weeks ago, 8 million of them, it was the start of a new Arab world.... The Berlin Wall has fallen. - Lebanese Druze leader Walid Jumblatt

...g I am stupid, but I swear blind I am not! I have looked at virtually every sample file on wiki and every tutorial on the web and it all looks ok. Is anybosy else using the latest CVS release on red hat 9? Is it working ok, as I am convinced that all is ok with my config and there is something else afoot. But until I totally rule out my stupidity I can't rest. If anyone has got some files I can look at please mail to "please at broadbandtap dot co dot uk" sorry for putting mail address like that, it just will help the spam when this message gets archived Regards Stuart Buchanan...

I'm seeing this in /var/log/messages: Oct 7 20:46:25 centos dbus: Can't send to audit system: USER_AVC avc: received setenforce notice (enforcing=0) : exe="?" (sauid=81, hostname=?, addr=?, terminal=?) Some googling suggested this was due to a policy issue a year ago, but I'm seeing it with selinux-policy-targeted-2.4.6-30.el5. I've got a game server program (Enemy

Hi The number of people who have had something to contribute here is is GREAT! For those not in the know, there is an initiative afoot to get a South African CVS site going that will contain the cryptography code that is otherwise illegal to get out of the USA. There has already been a fair amount of discussion about the code and the site, but mail is now getting difficult to deal with. I have set up a majordomo for those who ar...

i''m using Ferret 0.9.0 with acts_as_ferret (the one from svn.jkraemer.net), and i''m getting duplicate results, as described in this thread: http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/ferret-talk/2005-December/000048.html is there a way to configure the indexes created by acts_as_ferret to use :key => :id, as described in that thread? i''ve poked around in the code, and had