Displaying 20 results from an estimated 59 matches for "addresing".
Did you mean:
addressing
2004 Sep 02
2
lan addreses visible
Where is the documentation on stopping addresses of machines on a Lan
being visible to scanning s/w when masquerading through a firewall.
tnx
Richard
2004 Sep 12
0
sip does not bind all addreses
Hi,
My linuxbox has 2 eth's, one with pppoe for dsl, and also i got an ip_gre
tunnel. At the time i run asterisk, even i got bindaddr=0.0.0.0, it does
not show any port open for sip (5060), if i change 0.0.0.0 for any ip, next
time i reload, it opens the specific ip, changing back to 0.0.0.0 and
reloading, it keeps the same ip open.
The point is that i cant open all ips i need at the same
2004 May 25
1
using asterisk with iptel addreses
was wondering if anyone could give us a run through an explanation of the
wiki and other examples of connecting to iptel's sip express router using
asterisk pbx so i can understand better the call processing ..
given the example i work from on john todd's www.loligo.com site ;
exten => _3.,1,SetCallerID(${IPTELUSERID})
exten => _3.,2,SetCIDname(${IPTELUSERNAME})
exten =>
2013 Jul 12
3
new Shorewall + strongSwan blog
Hi Tom,
Thanks for the feedback about my Shorewall evaluation
I''ve published a blog today covering general things I''ve observed about
the way to combine Shorewall with strongSwan:
http://danielpocock.com/practical-linux-vpns-with-strongswan-shorewall-and-openwrt
Please let me know if anything is inaccurate or if there is anything
substantial that I missed and I''ll
2015 Feb 02
2
Fwd: sftp buggy put command
Hi!
I was tying out the put command with version 6.7_p1 of OpenSSH.
If I use recursive copying, sftp expects the last directory in the
<source> exists in the destination (on the server), otherwise ?Couldn't
canonicalize: No such file or directory?.
I would've taken this to be the expected behavior, but get command does
not have this problem. It makes the destination directory in
2011 Jan 25
1
MAtrix addressing
...le
matrix(data=seq(from=1,to=4,nrow=2,ncol=2, by row numbering) # not having R at this pc
will create something like the following
1 2
3 4
the way R address this matrix is from top left corner moving to bottom right.
The cell numbers in that way are
1 2
3 4
IS it possible to change this default addresing number to something that goes bottom left to top right? In this simple case I want to have
3 4
1 2
Would that be possible?
I would like to thank y for your help
Regards
Alex
2008 May 17
1
nmbd using 80-90% cpu for name reg from phantom
nmbd is using a lot of cpu:
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
22681 root 20 0 10080 1520 1084 R 99.0 0.3 146:30.78 nmbd
log.nmbd logs 30-40 messages per second::
[2008/05/17 12:56:41, 0]
nmbd/nmbd_incomingrequests.c:process_name_registration_request(212)
process_name_registration_request: unicast name registration request
received for name
2004 Jan 13
1
simple(?!?) source routing
Hi,
I''ve set up a Linux box with redhat on to act as an internet gateway and I''m running into a few problems. Its got two adsl modems connected to it, both connected to seperate 512kbs lines. Now I''ve followed the simple source routing in the advanced routing howto to the letter but it doesnt work.
I''ve got it autoconnecting on startup and redhat puts ppp1
2015 Oct 01
2
Tinc + OSPF - is it feasible?
Hello,
Please tell me if it's possible to use tinc together with OSPF (instead of
static routes in LAN). By OSPF I mean Quagga's GNU/Linux daemon.
Namely, I have a group of LANs (private 192.168.x.0/24 each).
Each LAN has a GNU/Linux default gateway, 192.168.x.1, that also connects
to the Internet via a public IP address (does NAT and firewall for the LAN
"behind" it).
tinc
2013 Nov 25
5
Sysinux 6 will not boot ISOs on BIOS (i.e. pre-UEFI) systems
On 11/24/2013 09:23 PM, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> On 11/23/2013 09:35 AM, Carl Duff wrote:
>> -- Re-sent as original may be stuck at awaiting "authorisation" (originally
>> sent before I joined the mailing list)
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> It is impossible to boot Linux-based ISOs that use Syslinux 6.02 via CD or
>> DVD on older - non-UEFI -
2004 May 06
3
tcng ingress policing question
Hi all
I started playing with tcng to generate my tc rules, but I have some
difficulty implementing my rules...
The script below generates an error:
# Device eth0
tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
beginner.tc:2: don''t know how to build meter for this
The script is below, I changed the real IP numbers for XXs and YYs,
since it doesn''t really matter what they are. eth0 is the
2004 Jan 15
2
Fw: Re:simple(?!?) source routing
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. Thats where the problem starts. If I set ppp0 as
the
default gw the internet doesnt work anymore. This is how im doing it...
route del default
route add default gw 217.32.81.74 dev ppp0
if I put it back to ppp1...
route del default
route add default gw 217.32.68.73 dev ppp1
It works fine again. Whats up with that?
Cheers,
Chris
----- Original Message
2003 Jan 13
0
Using private & public addresses together in the Shorewall''s DMZ zone
I have one question:
Can I use routable and non-routable IP addreses together in the DMZ zone?
I read the both three-interfaces setup and the Configuration Guide and each one explains how to do the either way? My problem is that, I have to use the public IP address for my DNS server (cannot change that), and setup additional web servers which will do port-forwarding (DNAT) through the firewall
2004 Jan 22
0
sshd start fails with:"fatal: Cannot bind any address." but the process return value 0 !
Hi,
I use openssh version:
OpenSSH_3.7.1p2, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0.9.6l 04 Nov 2003
(complied by myself) on redhat7.2 ( kernel 2.4.20-19.7smp )
It seems that sshd returns vith wrong returns value, if some other
process (e.g. another sshd) already reserved the given IP address and
port.
I setup two ssh daemon almost with the same settings in order to listen
on two different IP
2012 Jun 11
1
tftp-hpa bug on aliased interface and recent kernels.
So as of recent kernels, this change helps:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=network/tftp/tftp-hpa.git;a=commitdiff;h=c6d2c36b1a2b1986cab7aebb72d120fa118bdfeb
But there is still a flaw. Notably, if tftpd is running with AF_UNSPEC (as
it will if ipv6 support is desired), myrecvfrom will fail to setsockopt to
get the data back on the first pass.
I'd guess the least disruptive change to get to be
2006 Jun 23
0
Saving all network parameters like iptables-save
Is it possible to save all the ip addreses and routes and routing rules
and tc settings from the kernel in some kind of a file... just like
iptables-save does?
And if not, why not :) that would be a very usefull feature.
--
damjan | дамјан
This is my jabber ID --> damjan@bagra.net.mk
-- not my mail address, it''s a Jabber ID --^ :)
2004 May 07
0
FW: ISP Static IP assinging
Hi,
Thanks for the reply.
>> Not sure if this is the right mailing list for this but its kinda on
topic.
>It is ADVANCED routing; you have a simple configuration issue, so I hope
you posted more than just here.
>> we''ve installed a linux machine which load balances 2 adsl lines. The
>You left out a critical bit of info: WHAT DISTRO? F.E. Slackware does
this in
2013 Nov 25
0
Sysinux 6 will not boot ISOs on BIOS (i.e. pre-UEFI) systems
Hi,
my apologies to Mattias Schlenker for not remembering our
discussion about UEFI of march 2013. It would have been
more relevant in this context than the ia64 problems of
debian-cd of may 2013.
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote:
> The problem is the load LBA too high.
Nevertheless, this is the first confirmation that BIOS
dislikes high block addresses.
At least the older versions of mkisofs
2004 Sep 14
2
GSSAPI, Kerberos and multihomed hosts
(was: "Re: Pending OpenSSH release, call for testing", topic drift at
its finest :-)
Markus Moeller wrote:
> Douglas,
>
> OK three possible settings(hostname,connection IP,GSS_C_NO_NAME) are fine for me too.
Does GSS_C_NO_NAME relate to this bug (addressless tickets)?
http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=488
BTW, I opened a bug the the multihomed thing a couple of
2006 Jan 24
4
Xen in a routed network environment?
Hello,
I''m used to using Xen in a bridge mode where my dom0 and all domUs
are on the same layer 2 network. However now I have to set up a
server whose eth0 is on one network and the domUs will be on another
/29.
So, for example, if the eth0 of dom0 is 192.168.1.214/24, then I
have 10.1.1.0/29 (10.1.1.0 -> 10.1.1.7) routed to it for use in
domUs, how would I go about setting that up?