search for: ac11

I am trying to compile 2.4.10-ac11 w/ the ext3-2.4-0.9.12-2410ac11 patch. I'm getting unresolved symbols w/ ext3 module: cd /lib/modules/2.4.10-ac11; \ mkdir -p pcmcia; \ find kernel -path '*/pcmcia/*' -name '*.o' | xargs -i -r ln -sf ../{} pcmcia if [ -r System.map ]; then /sbin/depmod -ae -F System.map 2.4.1...

...----- - Fix oops in directory readahead on empty (ie. deleted) directories - Handle new S_NOQUOTA flag for 2.4.10+ quota code - Revert i_truncate_sem vs i_sem lock ordering to original design. This fixes an obscure deadlock, but will deadlock 2.4.11's shmem.c. It's safe with 2.4.10-ac11's shmem.c

Hi Maybe you allready fixed this problem but here goes: with ext3-0.9.10 and linux-2.4.10-SMP I get a hang doing the following: # mkdir test # cd test # rmdir ../test # ls There are no problems in ext3-0.9.12 and linux-2.4.10-ac11. Regards -- Lars Munch P.S. plz cc me, as I'm not on the list.

Hi folks, I successfully installed EXT3 on my non-SMP system. This is a (single) P3-450 with kernel 2.4.10-ac11 with the ext3-2.4-0.9.12-2410 patch applied. Works like a jiffy, although I only converted a single disc (and a not really important one too)! (Oh and this is a SuSE 7.0 system) I'd like to note that the Util-Linux installation is pretty hard to do and can go horribly wrong. In order not to...

...(C) seems totally off base, and does not seem like a productive interpretation. Does this match everyone else’s intuition, and is (B) even a valid interpretation? Cheers, Jon 1: http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA-expensive/16803/consoleFull#-1371525106d489585b-5106-414a-ac11-3ff90657619c <http://lab.llvm.org:8080/green/job/clang-stage1-cmake-RA-expensive/16803/consoleFull#-1371525106d489585b-5106-414a-ac11-3ff90657619c> 2: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopIdiomRecognize.cpp#L931 <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje...

....9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-)) ext3-2.4-0.9.12-2410ac11.gz 10Oct01 (Against 2.4.10-ac11) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.13-2413p6.gz 21Oct01 (Against 2.4.13-pre6) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.13-2413.gz 25Oct01 (Against 2.4.13) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p3.gz 28Oct01 (Against 2.4.14-pre3) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p5.gz 29Oct01 (Against 2.4....

....9-2410p4.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.10-pre4) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.9-249ac9.gz 05Sep01 (Against 2.4.9-ac9) ext3-2.4-0.9.10-2410.gz 23Sep01 (Against 2.4.10) (Changelog) patch-rml-2.4.10-ac3-ext3-0.9.9-with-dir-speedup-1.gz 01Oct01 (From Robert Love. Unofficial :-)) ext3-2.4-0.9.12-2410ac11.gz 10Oct01 (Against 2.4.10-ac11) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.13-2413p6.gz 21Oct01 (Against 2.4.13-pre6) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.13-2413.gz 25Oct01 (Against 2.4.13) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p3.gz 28Oct01 (Against 2.4.14-pre3) (Changelog) ext3-2.4-0.9.14-2414p5.gz 29Oct01 (Against 2.4....

...Inodes IUsed IFree IUse% Mounted on /dev/sda1 11206656 219569 10987087 2% /zdata all the EXT3-fs errors have an inode= value thats greater than the total number of inodes on this disk. We have been running EXT3 fs for sometime now, and recently upgraded kernels from 2.4.10-ac11 to 2.4.16 sda1 is a RAID5 hardware array (DPT PM1554U2). Can anyone make out what these errors mean? -- ----------------------------------------------------- Jessie Bryan e - jbryan@netlojix.com w - www.netlojix.com -----------------------------------------------------

Does anyone know if the 2.4.10-ac11 ext3 patch applies cleanly to 2.4.10-ac12? If so, do you think it's safe to use? Thanks!

I've not been happy with the stories about the "stable" 2.4.x kernels. Everywhere I read people saying "not for production use". Would you recommend adding ext3 to 2.2.19 (ext3-0.0.7a) or moving to 2.4.1x and using ext3 there (ext3-0.9.12)? -- -IAN! Ian! D. Allen Ottawa, Ontario, Canada idallen@ncf.ca Home Page on the Ottawa FreeNet: http://www.ncf.ca/~aa610/

Hi, After mounting -t ext2 an ext3 partition, working with, do I have to recreate .journal when I remount the partition as ext3 ? Thanks ! Liu

An EXT3 filesystem technically isn't supposed to require an fsck, correct? Well, as per my last email re: EXT3 Crash?! I ran an fsck on a couple of my LVMs. It said they were clean, but then I decided to be 100% sure and force an fsck. Error after Error after Error after Error. I wound up losing almost half the data on my LVM due to all the errors. What's the real deal? Am I doing

...;] [<c014b1b2>] Oct 19 17:23:52 noname kernel: [<c012bb76>] [<c0106ceb>] Oct 19 17:23:52 noname kernel: Oct 19 17:23:52 noname kernel: Code: 0f 0b 83 c4 14 56 e8 63 12 01 00 59 b8 01 00 00 00 0f b3 46 Anyone have any idea what could have caused this? SYSTEM: Kernel: v2.4.10-ac11 (stock LVM and EXT3 patches included with main kernel patch) E2fsprogs: v1.25 Utils: v2.11k Also, is there any way to throttle the access (r/w) to a filesystem? Say to 2MB/sec or something? Just on the off chance that it's a problem with the way either the Promise Ultra100 cards or the LVM o...