search for: ac10

I run an IPsec/Freeswan VPN to connect 4 disparet windows LANS. I managed to RTFM until cross-subnet browsing worked (samba 2.0). Having upgraded to 2.2.3 It would seem that this feature is not working. BACKGROUND: originally all sources of information led me to understand that I would need a box running samba behind the firewall/IPsec box as I could not even ping a remote internal IP from the

...ReportedBy: kumba at gentoo.org QAContact: rsync-qa at samba.org So if I read the IPv6 specs right, I can chop a chosen /64 subnet block up however which way I choose. This will involve subnets smaller than /64, like /96 or /120. So given a IPv6 addressing scheme like fd77:beef::ac10:0/120 (for simplicity sake, I am ignoring all precepts of ULA and that globally unique mess) specified in my rsyncd.conf file, then a server in that subnet and a client cannot talk. I.e., if an rsyncd server with IPv6 address fd77:beef::ac10:cb6f and an rsync client with IPv6 address of fd77:beef:...

Does anyone know if there's a patch out there for 2.4.9-ac10? I'm investigating what's involved to go from ext2 to 3. Thanks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/ext3-users/attachments/20060816/cf899f58/attachment.htm>

...DNAT --to 172.16.3.26:22 Then if a host sends a packet that will die on 172.16.1.40 : hping -t 1 --syn -p 666 172.16.1.40 This is the icmp packet we'll get from 172.16.1.40 : 17:07:46.709230 172.16.1.40 > 172.16.1.28: icmp: time exceeded in-transit 0x0000 45c0 0044 eaa6 0000 ff01 75f1 ac10 0128 E..D......u....( 0x0010 ac10 0118 0b00 516d 0000 0000 4500 0028 ......Qm....E..( 0x0020 b0f3 0000 0106 ac8a ac10 0118 ac10 031a <-+ ................ 0x0030 04bd 0016 3206 3ec0 0490 00b4 5002 0200 | ....2.&...

...nnot access files in the "pxelinux.cfg" dir RHEL4 works just fine !! ( kernel 2.6.9-22.EL) with (tftp-server-0.39-1.i386.rpm) But RHEL5 seems to be broken..... is the TFTP SERVER broken (tftp-server-0.42-3.1.i386.rpm) Client very SLOWLY displays thus: Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/AC1000FD Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/AC1000F Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/AC1000 Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/AC100 Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/AC10 Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/AC1 Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/AC Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/A Trying to load: pxelinux.cfg/default Message log : ###...

rh60/2.2.10-ac10 Compiling utils/torture.c utils/torture.c: In function `run_browsetest': utils/torture.c:929: invalid type argument of `->' utils/torture.c:934: invalid type argument of `->' utils/torture.c: In function `create_procs': utils/torture.c:1118: warning: initialization discards `...

...uot;cut off", i.e. only the first 0-800KB were actually stored. I'm not even 100% sure this is a Samba problem, but I stopped seeing these corrupted short files when I returned to Samba 2.0.7. The Samba share is just a plain old Linux ext2 partition, and the server is running kernel 2.4.9-ac10. I don't have an urgent need to use 2.2.1a, but I thought I should report this experience... More info available on request; please CC me as I'm not a subscriber. Regards, Dan Maas

...ost in.tftpd[25948]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/pxelinux.0 Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25950]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/pxelinux.cfg/03-03-13-83-83-d3-a3 Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25951]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/pxelinux.cfg/AC10001A Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25957]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/vmlinuz Jun 18 06:01:19 boothost in.tftpd[25958]: RRQ from 172.16.0.26 filename /centos5-i386/initrd.img Versions 3.50 and 3.51 request the filenames without the leading /centos5-i386, and fail: Jun...

.../24 dev lo metric 1024 error -101 mtu 65536 advmss 65476 hoplimit 4294967295 unreachable 2002:7f00::/24 dev lo metric 1024 error -101 mtu 65536 advmss 65476 hoplimit 4294967295 unreachable 2002:a9fe::/32 dev lo metric 1024 error -101 mtu 65536 advmss 65476 hoplimit 4294967295 unreachable 2002:ac10::/28 dev lo metric 1024 error -101 mtu 65536 advmss 65476 hoplimit 4294967295 unreachable 2002:c0a8::/32 dev lo metric 1024 error -101 mtu 65536 advmss 65476 hoplimit 4294967295 unreachable 2002:e000::/19 dev lo metric 1024 error -101 mtu 65536 advmss 65476 hoplimit 4294967295 2a00:c88:4000:1...

...{ DriveStatusError } end_request: I/O error, dev 03:01 (hda), sector 528431 Let me know if you have any idea what I could do to fix these issues. Ideally it wouldn't involve a recompile of the kernel! Thanks in advance... Some system/configuration info: kernel 2.4.9-ac10 PCMCIA CS 3.1.22 hda:SA1110 SPI v1.3 EXT3 FS 2.4-0.9.6, 11 Aug 2001 CONFIG_IDEDISK_MULTI_MODE is not set Proc/interrupts: 2: 12103 xr788 3: 34879 xr788 11: 197994 GPIO 11-27 15: 19318 serial_sa1100 17: 21510 serial_sa1100 26: 13907065...

...inet 217.232.54.6 peer 217.5.98.175/32 scope global ppp0 6: ippp0: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP> mtu 1500 qdisc noop qlen 30 link/ppp 7: sit1@NONE: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP> mtu 1472 qdisc noqueue link/sit 0.0.0.0 peer 206.123.31.114 inet6 fe80::d9e8:3606/10 scope link inet6 fe80::ac10:1/10 scope link inet6 3ffe:b80:2:c97::2/128 scope global The DSL modem used by ppp0 is connected directly to eth1. There are quite some non-fancy iptables rules in effect, as set up by a very basic shorewall configuration. The box is pretty damn idle. Thanks alot in advance, Malte -----BEGIN...

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1777 Bug ID: 1777 Summary: Error: COMMAND_FAILED: 'python-nftables' failed Product: nftables Version: 1.0.x Hardware: arm OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: blocker Priority: P5 Component: kernel Assignee: pablo at

...ixed in 2.4.3, so upgrade the kernel. I had forgotten that I fixed that bug (which I copied from ncpfs :). Also, not enough people have managed to get these lockups on 2.4.2-2 for it to become my standard answer when people use that version ... RedHat's 2.4.3-12 is for smbfs the same as 2.4.4-ac10, and the changes after that are small. So either get that one, or 2.4.8. /Urban Return-Path: <don_mccall@hp.com> Delivered-To: samba@lists.samba.org Received: from palrel1.hp.com (palrel1.hp.com [156.153.255.242]) by lists.samba.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C1A58B3 for <samba@lists....