search for: abominations

Le 06/12/2018 ? 18:54, John Hodrien a ?crit : > > Do you remember just how bad Gnome3 was in RHEL 7.0? It was unstable > and insecure, certainly when used with nvidia drivers. I can't see > how you could justify the effort it would have required to > effectively support an unsupported version of Gnome3, and backporting > I think would have been more than deeply unpleasant.

Yes, I know, XP-SP3 is very old. It works for what I need it for. I have some programs that will never be updated for Win 7. Note that XP-SP3 and Fedora 14 work together just fine, so I'm guessing that a newer version of Samba is what is keeping me from logging in from XP. But, I do not know what to put in the smb.conf file to allow XP to mount a share. Here is the output from testparm:

...eliminated in the model). This didn't work as lme didn't recognise the vector. 2) setting the term I wished to drop to a column of 0's so it couldn't be used in the analysis, but this created a singularity which then stopped lme from working.... Hmm, perhaps I should abandon such abominations ... does anyone have some advice on how I might get such a crude method working or must I turn back and fight with stepAIC? Thank you! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Stepwise-in-lme-tp4224724p4224724.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I wrote this abomination just now, and wonder if anyone else has had experience with the pattern behind it. In short, I''m specing an after_create hook on an ActiveRecord model, that calls a bunch of private methods. Instead of stubbing all those private methods (which is verboten anyway, as well as impossible because creating the object which owns those methods is what I''m

Hello, I'm using R version 2.2.0 installed on windows XP machine, with SP2 (maybe it's also interesting to note it's laptop, so it outputs to a laptop screen) a l and I wanted to draw a line in a graph, but it does not seem to work. To test it I use the following code: x = c(-1,0,1) y = c(-1,0,1) plot(x,y, type="l", xlim=c(-1,1), ylim=c(-1,1)) lines(0) If I understand the

LLVMers, The long awaited conclusion of bug 122 (VMCore cleanups) is very near. I have just committed all the changes to rid LLVM of the ConstantPointerRef abomination. This class no longer exists. Just use GlobalValue, GlobalVariable or Function directly. The changes pass 100% of Feature and Regression tests. Two minor discrepancies against the Programs tests were detected but these were

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:40PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Try running 'samba-tool testparm' and fix any errors it flags up. Is "samba-tool' a ubuntu Samba thing? With Fedora Samba versions 3.5 and 4.5, it does not exist. The 'testparm' most certainly does and I agree with using it. I just recently set up my new Fedora 25 box and used it after

...tach_ figures as *.pdf files, for instance. That being said, to answer your question, my advice (and that of many others) is: DON'T. Error bars on boxplots (such plots are sometimes known as "dynamite plots" or "detonator plots") are considered by the cognoscenti to be abominations. cheers, Rolf -- Technical Editor ANZJS Department of Statistics University of Auckland Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Volker, Assume I have a member server named LINUX joined to a domain name AD. Now assume I have a local user named foo in my passdb and a user named foo in the domain as well. I'm modifying winbindd_util.c:parse_domain_user() to do a lookup_name() to try to figure out which domain to prepend to the username rather than just assuming its a domain

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:10PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 20:08 -0500, Mike Brown via samba wrote: > > Yes, I know, XP-SP3 is very old.????It works for what I need it for.????I > > have > > some programs that will never be updated for Win 7. > > > > Note that XP-SP3 and Fedora 14 work together just fine, so I'm >

Interesting. Just having __builtin_apply_args() (and a correspoding __builtin_apply_args_size()), would make it possible to do a memcpy store of arguments to a (varargs) function, which sometimes is useful for our users (for debug/trace purposes). /Patrik Hägglund From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Christopher Sent: den 2 oktober 2013

__builtin_apply is an abomination. Even in GCC it is held to have been a bad idea. --eric On Oct 1, 2013 10:03 PM, "reed kotler" <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > why does clang not support builtin_apply? > > 6.5 Constructing Function Calls > > Using the built-in functions described below, you can record the arguments > a function received, and call another

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:51:53AM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > Am 12.06.2017 um 09:41 schrieb Mike Brown via samba: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >>> Am 12.06.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Mike Brown via samba: >>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:10PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>>>> On Sun,

Indeed. However, I wouldn't have called variable number of arguments a "sophisticated feature". :-) /Patrik Hägglund -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Krzysztof Parzyszek Sent: den 2 oktober 2013 19:12 To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] builtin_apply? I think varargs functions would

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > Am 12.06.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Mike Brown via samba: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:10PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>> On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 20:08 -0500, Mike Brown via samba wrote: >>>> Yes, I know, XP-SP3 is very old.????It works for what I need it for.????I >>>>

Sorry if this is too "OT", but there is a particular relevance to postings to R-help. Of recent times, I have received several postings via R-help (and some other mailing-lists) in which the "_" character is inserted where, presumably, a space, " ", was intended. An example (received this morning) is below, which (from the headers) was originally sent through Yahoo

Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 05:04:29PM CET, alexander.duyck at gmail.com wrote: >On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: >> Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:11:19PM CET, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >>>Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP that can be >>>used by hypervisor to indicate that virtio_net interface should act

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:11:19PM CET, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >>Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP that can be >>used by hypervisor to indicate that virtio_net interface should act as >>a backup for another device with the same MAC address. >>

On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 2:42 AM, Jiri Pirko <jiri at resnulli.us> wrote: > Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 07:11:19PM CET, sridhar.samudrala at intel.com wrote: >>Patch 1 introduces a new feature bit VIRTIO_NET_F_BACKUP that can be >>used by hypervisor to indicate that virtio_net interface should act as >>a backup for another device with the same MAC address. >>

I think varargs functions would be an example of where this builtin would not work. -K On 10/2/2013 2:32 AM, Patrik Hägglund H wrote: > Interesting. Just having __builtin_apply_args() (and a correspoding > __builtin_apply_args_size()), would make it possible to do a memcpy > store of arguments to a (varargs) function, which sometimes is useful > for our users (for debug/trace