search for: abomination

...ou could justify the effort it would have required to > effectively support an unsupported version of Gnome3, and backporting > I think would have been more than deeply unpleasant. Or they could simply have gone with KDE 4, a stable and mature desktop at the time RHEL 7.0 was out. And not an abomination that had to be potty-trained from scratch again while steadily losing features every other minor upgrade. Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site : https://www.microlinux.fr Blog : https://blog.microlinux.fr Mail : info at microlinux....

Yes, I know, XP-SP3 is very old. It works for what I need it for. I have some programs that will never be updated for Win 7. Note that XP-SP3 and Fedora 14 work together just fine, so I'm guessing that a newer version of Samba is what is keeping me from logging in from XP. But, I do not know what to put in the smb.conf file to allow XP to mount a share. Here is the output from testparm:

...eliminated in the model). This didn't work as lme didn't recognise the vector. 2) setting the term I wished to drop to a column of 0's so it couldn't be used in the analysis, but this created a singularity which then stopped lme from working.... Hmm, perhaps I should abandon such abominations ... does anyone have some advice on how I might get such a crude method working or must I turn back and fight with stepAIC? Thank you! -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/Stepwise-in-lme-tp4224724p4224724.html Sent from the R help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

I wrote this abomination just now, and wonder if anyone else has had experience with the pattern behind it. In short, I''m specing an after_create hook on an ActiveRecord model, that calls a bunch of private methods. Instead of stubbing all those private methods (which is verboten anyway, as well as impossible beca...

Hello, I'm using R version 2.2.0 installed on windows XP machine, with SP2 (maybe it's also interesting to note it's laptop, so it outputs to a laptop screen) a l and I wanted to draw a line in a graph, but it does not seem to work. To test it I use the following code: x = c(-1,0,1) y = c(-1,0,1) plot(x,y, type="l", xlim=c(-1,1), ylim=c(-1,1)) lines(0) If I understand the

LLVMers, The long awaited conclusion of bug 122 (VMCore cleanups) is very near. I have just committed all the changes to rid LLVM of the ConstantPointerRef abomination. This class no longer exists. Just use GlobalValue, GlobalVariable or Function directly. The changes pass 100% of Feature and Regression tests. Two minor discrepancies against the Programs tests were detected but these were attributed to either the test program (changes committed) or the test...

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:40PM +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Try running 'samba-tool testparm' and fix any errors it flags up. Is "samba-tool' a ubuntu Samba thing? With Fedora Samba versions 3.5 and 4.5, it does not exist. The 'testparm' most certainly does and I agree with using it. I just recently set up my new Fedora 25 box and used it after

...tach_ figures as *.pdf files, for instance. That being said, to answer your question, my advice (and that of many others) is: DON'T. Error bars on boxplots (such plots are sometimes known as "dynamite plots" or "detonator plots") are considered by the cognoscenti to be abominations. cheers, Rolf -- Technical Editor ANZJS Department of Statistics University of Auckland Phone: +64-9-373-7599 ext. 88276

...in_user() to do a lookup_name() to try to figure out which domain to prepend to the username rather than just assuming its a domain user. But this means that we'll always choose the local user (due to the order of an isolated search in lookup_name()). The main problem is the use default domain abomination will confuse local and domain users of the same name and possibly return incorrect group membership. I am about a 1/2 inch from marking the smb.conf option as deprecated and adding similar option to pam_winbind.conf. This option just cannot work reliably. Do you have any suggestions? cheers,...

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:10PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 20:08 -0500, Mike Brown via samba wrote: > > Yes, I know, XP-SP3 is very old.????It works for what I need it for.????I > > have > > some programs that will never be updated for Win 7. > > > > Note that XP-SP3 and Fedora 14 work together just fine, so I'm >

...our users (for debug/trace purposes). /Patrik Hägglund From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Eric Christopher Sent: den 2 oktober 2013 07:22 To: reed kotler Cc: LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] builtin_apply? __builtin_apply is an abomination. Even in GCC it is held to have been a bad idea. --eric On Oct 1, 2013 10:03 PM, "reed kotler" <rkotler at mips.com<mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: why does clang not support builtin_apply? 6.5 Constructing Function Calls Using the built-in functions described below, you...

__builtin_apply is an abomination. Even in GCC it is held to have been a bad idea. --eric On Oct 1, 2013 10:03 PM, "reed kotler" <rkotler at mips.com> wrote: > why does clang not support builtin_apply? > > 6.5 Constructing Function Calls > > Using the built-in functions described below, you can rec...

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:51:53AM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > Am 12.06.2017 um 09:41 schrieb Mike Brown via samba: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: >>> Am 12.06.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Mike Brown via samba: >>>> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:10PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>>>> On Sun,

...nd > > *From:*llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > *On Behalf Of *Eric Christopher > *Sent:* den 2 oktober 2013 07:22 > *To:* reed kotler > *Cc:* LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu > *Subject:* Re: [LLVMdev] builtin_apply? > > __builtin_apply is an abomination. Even in GCC it is held to have been a > bad idea. > > --eric > > On Oct 1, 2013 10:03 PM, "reed kotler" <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > why does clang not support builtin_apply? > > > 6.5 Constructing Func...

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 09:28:20AM +0200, Reindl Harald via samba wrote: > Am 12.06.2017 um 09:03 schrieb Mike Brown via samba: >> On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 01:53:10PM +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >>> On Sun, 2017-06-11 at 20:08 -0500, Mike Brown via samba wrote: >>>> Yes, I know, XP-SP3 is very old.????It works for what I need it for.????I >>>>

Sorry if this is too "OT", but there is a particular relevance to postings to R-help. Of recent times, I have received several postings via R-help (and some other mailing-lists) in which the "_" character is inserted where, presumably, a space, " ", was intended. An example (received this morning) is below, which (from the headers) was originally sent through Yahoo

...ow we only have >a single bit so the goal for now is trying to keep this as simple as >possible. Oh. So there is really intention to do re-implementation of bonding in virtio. That is plain-wrong in my opinion. Could you just use bond/team, please, and don't reinvent the wheel with this abomination? > >> What is the reason for this abomination? According to: >> https://marc.info/?l=linux-virtualization&m=151189725224231&w=2 >> The reason is quite weak. >> User in the vm sees 2 (or more) netdevices, he puts them in bond/team >> and that's it. This...

...hat we can look at doing a virtio-bond sort of device that will handle all this as well as providing a communication channel, but that is much further down the road. For now we only have a single bit so the goal for now is trying to keep this as simple as possible. > What is the reason for this abomination? According to: > https://marc.info/?l=linux-virtualization&m=151189725224231&w=2 > The reason is quite weak. > User in the vm sees 2 (or more) netdevices, he puts them in bond/team > and that's it. This works now! If the vm lacks some userspace features, > let's fix i...

...hat we can look at doing a virtio-bond sort of device that will handle all this as well as providing a communication channel, but that is much further down the road. For now we only have a single bit so the goal for now is trying to keep this as simple as possible. > What is the reason for this abomination? According to: > https://marc.info/?l=linux-virtualization&m=151189725224231&w=2 > The reason is quite weak. > User in the vm sees 2 (or more) netdevices, he puts them in bond/team > and that's it. This works now! If the vm lacks some userspace features, > let's fix i...

...nd > > *From:*llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] > *On Behalf Of *Eric Christopher > *Sent:* den 2 oktober 2013 07:22 > *To:* reed kotler > *Cc:* LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu > *Subject:* Re: [LLVMdev] builtin_apply? > > __builtin_apply is an abomination. Even in GCC it is held to have been a > bad idea. > > --eric > > On Oct 1, 2013 10:03 PM, "reed kotler" <rkotler at mips.com > <mailto:rkotler at mips.com>> wrote: > > why does clang not support builtin_apply? > > > 6.5 Constructing Func...