search for: _when_

...which is >>      most likely what they saw before and overwhelmingly more likely to >>      be correct than if the -e option had been used. >> The more I think about it, the more I disagree with disabling this. Or, put another way, I think that the _only_ time -e makes sense is _when_ you are using --run. Consider: nbdkit -U - -e foo info --run 'nbdsh -u $uri -c "print(h.pread(3, 0))"' nbdkit -U - -e bar info --run 'nbdsh -u $uri -c "print(h.pread(3, 0))"' Of course, you can accomplish the same with: nbdkit -U - info --run 'nbdsh -u n...

...ly, OptNone should take no role in this particular discussion, and I feel like so far it has because "We've always done it this way". Second, I don't completely subscribe to the arguments towards not-skippable passes. Fundamentally: Who decides whether a pass is skippable or not? _When_ is a pass skippable, when isn't it? Neither the Pass nor the PassManager may actually decide that. The only things that do are the pipeline builder and the bisecter. Pipeline builder here means the driver tool that constructs and executes the pipeline (like clang or opt), not PassBuilder. We ca...

I''m having a problem trying to come up with the best way to go about doing something in a Rails app. Here''s the situation: I have a form with a list of check boxes a client can choose from, but my client also wants the user to be able to submit their own item, wich will be saved in the table that populates the check boxes. Does anyone have any insight into this? Thanks a

...ot; one. Lets say that pass "runs in 'skip' mode". > Even Module passes could run in degraded mode. >> Second, I don't completely subscribe to the arguments towards >> not-skippable passes. Fundamentally: Who decides whether a pass is >> skippable or not? _When_ is a pass skippable, when isn't it? Neither >> the Pass nor the PassManager may actually decide that. The only things >> that do are the pipeline builder and the bisecter. Pipeline builder >> here means the driver tool that constructs and executes the pipeline >> (like c...

Hi, I'm looking for a way to use ext3 in the following setup for experimentations purposes: I have a machine A, a machine B, one of which is read-write, and machine B is read-only. I would want the machine B to be the exact copy of machine A, automagically, like it would happen in an SQL replication scheme. Is it possible to do with ext3, using the hidden .journal file as a source

...x with the same perms as the other files (755), yet I still can't read it. 5. I can read it if I unshare and then re-share the windows folder from windows explorer. This seems like some type of asynchronous thing within windows that basically caches a list of files that are ok for sharing _when_ the folder is shared. However, the weird thing is that I can drop a file in by hand (image, txt file, doesn't matter) and immediately have read access from Linux. I am testing read access a number of ways, using "file", "strings", even "cat". Again - an ls s...

...likely what they saw before and overwhelmingly more likely to > >>     be correct than if the -e option had been used. > >> > > The more I think about it, the more I disagree with disabling this. > Or, put another way, I think that the _only_ time -e makes sense is > _when_ you are using --run. Consider: > > nbdkit -U - -e foo info --run 'nbdsh -u $uri -c "print(h.pread(3, 0))"' > nbdkit -U - -e bar info --run 'nbdsh -u $uri -c "print(h.pread(3, 0))"' > > Of course, you can accomplish the same with: > > nbdk...

Hi. CentOS 5.4 64-bit with SELinux, happily running for over a year, suddenly httpd fails to start up, getting an error message like: Starting httpd: Syntax error on line X of /etc/httpd/conf.d/php.conf: Cannot load /etc/httpd/modules/libphp5.so into server: libxml2.so.2: failed to map segment from shared object: Permission denied I turned off SELinux and was able to start httpd. But what went

On 7/22/20 4:02 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> The more I think about it, the more I disagree with disabling this. >> Or, put another way, I think that the _only_ time -e makes sense is >> _when_ you are using --run. Consider: >> >> nbdkit -U - -e foo info --run 'nbdsh -u $uri -c "print(h.pread(3, 0))"' >> nbdkit -U - -e bar info --run 'nbdsh -u $uri -c "print(h.pread(3, 0))"' >> >> Of course, you can accomplish the same wit...

Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote: > On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Nick Lewycky<nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > >> The way in which Gallium3D targets LLVM, is that it waits until it receives >> the shader program from the application, then compiles that down to LLVM IR. >> That's too late to start synthesizing hardware (unless you're planning to >>

Folks: Over the years, many people -- including some who I would consider real expeRts -- have criticized factors and advocated the use (sometimes exclusively) of character vectors instead. I would just like to point out that, for me, factors provide one feature that I find to be very convenient: ordering of levels. ** As an example, suppose one has a character vector of labels

On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:48 AM, Nick Lewycky <nicholas at mxc.ca> wrote: > The way in which Gallium3D targets LLVM, is that it waits until it receives > the shader program from the application, then compiles that down to LLVM IR. > That's too late to start synthesizing hardware (unless you're planning to > ship an FPGA as the graphics card, in which case reprogramming

On 10/01/2018 08:39 PM, David Greene wrote: > "Kaylor, Andrew" <andrew.kaylor at intel.com> writes: > >> What if in the registration interface we had three options: skippable, >> not skippable, and run at OptLevel::None. > I kind of like this idea. If necessary, the pass could even query the > target (or some other entity) about what OptLevel::None means.

This parameter provided a name for the "default export" -- ie. the one and only export returned to the client by NBD_OPT_LIST. But nbdkit traditionally didn't care what export name the client requested. Since 1.16 plugins have been able to serve different content per export name (and return errors for unknown exports), but the -e option didn't reflect that and only created

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14597 Summary: randr12 failures on 12" powerbooks, and workarounds Product: xorg Version: git Platform: Other OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Driver/nouveau AssignedTo: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org

The standard controller that has been recommended in the past is the AOC-SAT2-MV8 - an 8 port with a marvel chipset. There have been several mentions of LSI based controllers on the mailing lists and I''m wondering about them. One obvious difference is that the Marvel contoller is PCI-X and the LSI controllers are PCI-E. Supermicro have several LSI controllers. AOC-USASLP-L8i with the