Displaying 9 results from an estimated 9 matches for "_several_".
Did you mean:
_general_
2002 Jul 01
1
Fitting a batch of histograms
Hello.
I've several histograms accumulated all together in one time.
Can I fit them simultaneously, too, using the same set of parameters for
all histograms?
--
Thank you very much,
Timur.
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-help mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or
2014 Apr 22
2
[LLVMdev] Building sanitizers for Android
...tizer
>
>
> This is a public interface. But ASan runtime (and test-suite) strongly
> depends on the instrumentation
> pass in Clang. The latter can define hidden experimental flags we are
> testing. Instrumentation pass
> and compiler-rt library depend on each other. There were _several_ changes
> in instrumentation pass
> last week, most of which required a corresponding change in compiler-rt:
>
> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/commits/master/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
>
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/llvm-mirror/compiler...
2001 Nov 19
3
Netlogon Long username
I just upgraded a server from an older version of samba to the newer
2.2.2. When I login from a win 98 machine with a username longer than 8
characters I get an error that Z:usern~93.bat could not be found. This
is only a problem with 2.2.2. Is this a know issue, or did I miss a
config option? Do I need to supply more information to help track this
issue down?
Thanks for the help.
2014 Apr 22
5
[LLVMdev] Building sanitizers for Android
Sorry for the slow replies. I'm out on vacation this week.
Alexey wrote:
> If you want to test the sanitizer runtiume library "during development",
> you should verify that it works with the Clang at hand.
I want to test an implementation of libraries, not that clang links a
library in its install directory. We only need one clang test for the
latter (not 100) and that
2003 Aug 21
3
Diamond graphs
...The diamond graph appears
to rely on the two explanatory variables having nearly the same number of
values, which would seem to limit its usefulness.
What would happen if we turn the diagram back so that the axes are
horizontal and vertical? Well, with square (or rectangular) cells
we could put _several_ vertical bars in each cell, and so display
2 or 3 variables on the same 2d grid, something which would be very
hard to do in a diamond graph.
In short, it looks to me as though "diamond graphs" are something R
is better off without.
2011 Dec 09
3
Help with Error: POSIX collating elements are not supported
Hello,
I hope this is the right place to get help fixing an error when using
Markdown on our servers.
I'm not sure what our webmasters have done, but a recent change (perhaps to
PHP?) made our Markdown text disappear from the page because of an error.
PHP Warning: preg_replace_callback() [<a
href='function.preg-replace-callback'>function.preg-replace-callback</a>]:
2004 Jun 18
1
[LLVMdev] Getelementptr woes
Chris Lattner wrote:
> > So I wonder if I can away by writing two passes which work on LLVM level.
> > The first pass would extract all ConstantExpr* operands from instructions
> > and move them into separate instructions. E.g. the example above would
> > become:
> >
> > %tmp.1 = sbyte* getelementptr ([11 x sbyte]* %.str_1, ..........
> > %tmp.0.i =
2005 May 22
2
Re: Hi, Bryan; was: Re: pronunciation? <snip> -- don't shoot the messenger ...
...;T was broken up and could now sell UNIX,
he _knew_ companies can change overnight.
When Red Hat kills its GPL focus, then you will hear me point out the same deals.
Until then, no matter what Red Hat does commercially, we benefit from what they do.
Stallman's moral delima at the foundation of _several_ companies (not just Red Hat) - the ultimate savior from themselves.
IBM is still heavily non-GPL and, again, the irony is that their GPL and even GPL donations still trail even Sun if you can believe that.
Does that mean IBM is bad? I could care less about such a simplication!
But IBM does have a...
2005 Jun 21
9
[OT] Memory Models and Multi/Virtual-Cores -- WAS: 4.0 -> 4.1 update failing
From: Maciej ?enczykowski <maze at cela.pl>
> That's a good point - does anyone know what the new Intel
> Virtualization thingamajig in the new dual core pentium D's is about?
It's all speculation at this point. But there are _several_ factors.
But I'm sure the first time Intel saw AMD's x86-64/PAE52 presentation,
the same thing popped into my mind that popped into Intel's mind ...
Virtualization
- The 48-bit/256TiB limitation of x86-64 "Long Mode"
There is a "progammers limit" of 48-bit/256Ti...