search for: _general_

Hi, Is there a way to do the following with lartc tools : I would like to limit any entering user to not use more than Xkb/mb to my website. The IPs they use are changing all the time so static IP limitation cannot be used. Is there a way doing so ? EC. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO:

I?m new to R so maybe this issue has been asked before and I still could not read the complete set of past messages sent to the list. I found a weird behabiour that I will explain with a simple example. Lets consider the following block of commands: > x <- diag(c(1,4,10)) > x [,1] [,2] [,3] [1,] 1 0 0 [2,] 0 4 0 [3,] 0 0 10 > invx <- x^-1 > invx

Hi all, I''m in the throes of the REST conversion and I''m wondering: How important is it to retain backward compatibility? The language will clearly be consistent between the two, but it looks like it''s going to be a heckuva lot more complicated to keep compatibility for all network services (as in, for each of them, I''ll have to write a shell that

Hi everyone! I want to manage mail server resource part (like it can CGP) and with it I have one question. Is any way to limit overall max simultaneous connections to imap/pop3 server from one(each) host, except use iptables/ipfw and so on? Like a patch to dovecot or, maybe, it can be released in future versions? I know about mail_max_userip_connections in dovecot 1.1 but it can't limit

...n more. Perhaps I do not understand Philippe`s "loggable". What does a logfile with IPs help? The spammers are strangers selling viagra; I don`t want to find them :-) > > To sum it up: > There is a very simple way to proceed: > Philippe uses his Docuwiki install as official, _general_ Rwiki and I close down mine. The beginners will find their niche in there, if there is a real demand. > I wouldn????t mind to give up "my" wiki, because I have to admit it failed to achieve what I would have liked. > > So, Philippe, if you like, you can take over. I would repla...

So here''s a random question: if a (Ruby) multi-threaded rails server could exist (bug free), would it be faster than using a mongrel cluster? (I.e. 10 mongrel processes versus 10 Ruby threads). I''m not sure if it would. RAM it might save, though. Any thoughts? -Roger -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: