search for: _really

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "_really".

Did you mean: really
2020 Jun 22
6
Voice broken during calls (again...)
...cian was here to check the DSL... Nothing found, except that for 50Mbps I need now vectoring. Really nice... A couple of years ago I could get 50Mbps without vectoring. Of course, Deutsche Telekom said nothing about this change... Well, I got it working, and now I have 48Mbps down and 10Mbps up. I _REALLY CAN'T_ believe, that this is not enough... The problem with many little disruptions during calls is always here. I tried changing the codecs and changing some settings in the SIP configuration of the peers. No changes... On the Gateway (Banana PI), where the Asterisk server also runs, the lo...
2019 Sep 04
7
[RFC] changing variable naming rules
Hi all, To get wider visibility, build a broader consensus and address concerns on this topic, I'm again raising this as an RFC. This is a proposal to change the rule for variable names from CamelCase to camelBack _really this time_. Background: This has been proposed several times on this mailing list in the past. Most recent one was by Michael Platings in February this year [1], and there seems to be a general consensus that the status quo is not ideal. In the previous RFC thread, I nominated lld [2] as a start...
2019 Sep 07
2
[RFC] changing variable naming rules
...man > On 9/3/2019 8:14 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev wrote: > > Hi all, > > To get wider visibility, build a broader consensus and address concerns on this topic, I'm again raising this as an RFC. This is a proposal to change the rule for variable names from CamelCase to camelBack _really this time_. > > Background: > > This has been proposed several times on this mailing list in the past. Most recent one was by Michael Platings in February this year [1], and there seems to be a general consensus that the status quo is not ideal. > > In the previous RFC thread, I n...
2020 Jun 22
0
Voice broken during calls (again...)
...cian was here to check the DSL... Nothing found, except that for 50Mbps I need now vectoring. Really nice... A couple of years ago I could get 50Mbps without vectoring. Of course, Deutsche Telekom said nothing about this change... Well, I got it working, and now I have 48Mbps down and 10Mbps up. I _REALLY CAN'T_ believe, that this is not enough... The problem with many little disruptions during calls is always here. I tried changing the codecs and changing some settings in the SIP configuration of the peers. No changes... On the Gateway (Banana PI), where the Asterisk server also runs, the lo...
2020 Jul 03
0
Voice broken during calls (again...)
...... > Nothing found, except that for 50Mbps I need now vectoring. Really > nice... A couple of years ago I could get 50Mbps without vectoring. > Of course, Deutsche Telekom said nothing about this change... > > Well, I got it working, and now I have 48Mbps down and 10Mbps up. > I _REALLY CAN'T_ believe, that this is not enough... > > The problem with many little disruptions during calls is always here. > > I tried changing the codecs and changing some settings in the SIP > configuration of the peers. > No changes... > > On the Gateway (Banana PI), whe...
2020 Jun 22
0
Voice broken during calls (again...)
...... > Nothing found, except that for 50Mbps I need now vectoring. Really > nice... A couple of years ago I could get 50Mbps without vectoring. > Of course, Deutsche Telekom said nothing about this change... > > Well, I got it working, and now I have 48Mbps down and 10Mbps up. > I _REALLY CAN'T_ believe, that this is not enough... This is enough if you're doing it correctly. But that's your job to do it correctly - not Telekom's one. > The problem with many little disruptions during calls is always here. Not surprising. That's most probably not a problem of...
2019 Sep 08
2
[RFC] changing variable naming rules
...; On 9/3/2019 8:14 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> To get wider visibility, build a broader consensus and address concerns on this topic, I'm again raising this as an RFC. This is a proposal to change the rule for variable names from CamelCase to camelBack _really this time_. >> >> Background: >> >> This has been proposed several times on this mailing list in the past. Most recent one was by Michael Platings in February this year [1], and there seems to be a general consensus that the status quo is not ideal. >> >> In t...
2005 Feb 22
3
AW: 3Ware 9xxx 9500S-4LP SATA Raid with CentOS3.3?
...DOES<br> > NOT contain the 3w-9xxx drivers. The drivers have been added to 2.6.10 and<br> > later.<br> </tt></font> <br><font size=2><tt>Seth -- I just installed RHEL 4 AS, and the 3w-9xxx is included. But<br> I'm suspicious. I have _really crappy performance on my raid array<br> now. I don't have any numbers with me now, but for example, it takes<br> about 20-25 minutes to format a 260G partition. Read write is<br> horrible too. I haven't had time to troubleshoot yet (or contact RH,<br> since this b...
2002 Jun 26
1
PLEASE!!! FW: Joining XP Pro Client to Samba Domain- Was working, not anymore
Anyone please!!! -----Original Message----- From: samba-admin@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-admin@lists.samba.org] On Behalf Of Timothy Kersten Sent: Wednesday, 26 June 2002 1:12 PM To: samba@lists.samba.org Subject: [Samba] Joining XP Pro Client to Samba Domain- Was working, not anymore I have searched for 2 days on the net and can't find an answer. I am trying to joing a winXP machine
2019 Sep 06
3
[RFC] changing variable naming rules
...14 PM, Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: Hi all, To get wider visibility, build a broader consensus and address concerns on this topic, I'm again raising this as an RFC. This is a proposal to change the rule for variable names from CamelCase to camelBack _really this time_. Background: This has been proposed several times on this mailing list in the past. Most recent one was by Michael Platings in February this year [1], and there seems to be a general consensus that the status quo is not ideal. In the previous RFC thread, I nominated lld [2] as a start...
1998 Feb 23
7
nmb log file entry
Hi, I am getting this log entry in the nmb.log file. Any ideas why I am getting it? query_name_response: Multiple (2) responses received for a query on subnet 9.36. 220.43 for name WHITE<1d>. This response was from IP 9.36.223.255 Thanks Chip