search for: _finally_

...> some point I will have to power cycle it ... >> >> Does anyone know how to bypass this? - or at least stop it increasing >> the limit each time it is reached? >> >> It does seems rather pointless to keep increasing the limit like this >> ... >> > It _finally_ gave up at 30 mins and rebooted One question: did it have a mounted nfs filesystem? The joys of systemd.... mark mark

I'm currently trying to reboot a CentOS 7.5 workstation (to complete an upgrade to 7.6), but it is 'stuck' while shutting down with 'A stop job is running for ...' - the counter initially gave a limit of '1min 30s' - but each time it reaches that limit, it just adds on ~90 seconds to the limit ... Currently the limit is '25min 33s' I'm in no hurry to

So, I _finally_ got the time to upgrade from 0.99.14 ... which I told myself I'd upgrade from once 1.0 was released... (yep, I've been _that_ busy :) So I read the Wiki page on 0.99->1.0 transition, and went through the config file - for all of about 5 or 10 minutes. I logged in at 11pm when nobody...

So. I _finally_ got the building and packaging of LLVM and the GCC FE into a state I'm more or less happy with. As a result, I uploaded x86 packages into the NEW queue just a little while ago. Whew. What this means is that in a few weeks (hard to say how long, really) the package will be reviewed by the Debi...

...modules to compile. Putting in @LIBAO_FILES@ just didn't work, even though I added the EXTRA_libao_la_SOURCES files. Somebody who knows more please point out the error(s) in my ways. * src/*.c (not quite yet...) -- #include "audio_out.h" is now #include <ao/ao.h> Kenneth (_finally_ finding a spare moment to work on something I _want_ to work on) --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscr...

On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, Al Stone wrote: > So. I _finally_ got the building and packaging of LLVM and the > GCC FE into a state I'm more or less happy with. As a result, I > uploaded x86 packages into the NEW queue just a little while ago. > Whew. Nice! Thanks a lot Al! -Chris > What this means is that in a few weeks (hard to say how l...

...workstation operational, but I guess at > some point I will have to power cycle it ... > > Does anyone know how to bypass this? - or at least stop it increasing > the limit each time it is reached? > > It does seems rather pointless to keep increasing the limit like this ... It _finally_ gave up at 30 mins and rebooted James Pearson

Hello I am having trouble setting up the cdr_odbc with MSSQL server. Has anybody done this? I have followed what little documentation I can find. Asterisk errors on a connection error, but tcpdump doesn't even show an attempt. Does anybody have some examples for MSSQL ODBC CDR? I've downloaded unixODBC and the FreeTDS project, recompiled asterisk.... Thanks Duane Cox --------------

I looks like someone decided to bundle a patch that hasn't been merged yet. Good for testing, not so good for initial impressions. In /etc/asterisk/asterisk.conf add or uncomment this: [options] ;silence_suppression=yes And see if that helps. You need a timing source for it to work, which is why it is disabled by default, but the logging might be a bit chatty in any case. Dan

...eleased GCC g++ compilers (3.4.6, 4.0.3, 4.1.1) made any official distinction for it). As the original commit indicates though, the it was common. So common in fact that a [hpp-patch] was filed in 2004 to address this. The `.hpp` extension became a first-class c++ extension when the hpp-patch was _finally_ applied in Aug. 2007 and so for GCC >= 4.2.2 it was standard. LLVM had a [clang patch] in their code base to recognize `.hpp` for its frontend options in 2009, so LLVM >= 2.7, meaning that releases of XCode >= 3.2.6 can consider `.hpp` an officially supported extension. XCode 3.2.6 goes b...

...y were distributing Red Hat's product, unmodified. They were not and actually distributing a radically different version that was heavily modified. I even had this discussion with a guy who hates RPM and Red Hat, and once he finally realized that his _entire_ viewpoint was based on Cobalts, he _finally_ saw the whole reason for the trademark issues Red Hat now has. It was quite an epiphany. ;-> -- Bryan J. Smith mailto:b.j.smith at ieee.org

On 01/08/2015 12:44 PM, Gary R Hook wrote: > I've learned how to use the blockcopy command to create a local copy in > a simple disk file: > > virsh dumpxml my_domain > my_domain.xml > virsh undefine my_domain > virsh blockcopy --domain my_domain vda $PWD/dsk.copy.qcow2 --wait > --verbose --finish > virsh define my_domain.xml > > and the resulting copy in

It has been suggested that the wine-users list is now too busy, and needs to be split into two: one for experienced users, and one for beginners. However, this might leave the beginners adrift without any experienced people to help them. So I don't think we should do it unless at least a handful of experienced users are willing to join the new group and lend a hand. I'm willing, but I

From: Maciej ?enczykowski <maze at cela.pl> > That's a good point - does anyone know what the new Intel > Virtualization thingamajig in the new dual core pentium D's is about? It's all speculation at this point. But there are _several_ factors. But I'm sure the first time Intel saw AMD's x86-64/PAE52 presentation, the same thing popped into my mind that popped