search for: ___the___

...?? * OGY IS POLICY @ THE END **************************************** L ***************** O * FIGHT * TRUST NO ONE @ DE E @ BELIEVE THE LIE @ AP * THE * N T * FUTURE!!! * ___THE___ Y A ***************** \ \ / / CSUFBO @ EVRES RO TSISER @ ELGIEVNI @ EVIECED @ ET E @ \ V / E _______________________________________________ O L \ / V |Juan Carlos Castro y Castro | H S / \ E |jcastro@p...

Please excuse me if this has been covered, but I just noticed something odd with samba 2 beta 1. If I use smbclient to connect to a passworded resource on a win machine (I've tried it with 98/95) and I just hit enter for the password, it lets me in. No questions asked. So, I pretty much have unlimited read access to stuff I should not be able to get to. Best Regards. If this is the wrong

...?? * OGY IS POLICY @ THE END **************************************** L ***************** O * FIGHT * TRUST NO ONE @ DE E @ BELIEVE THE LIE @ AP * THE * N T * FUTURE!!! * ___THE___ Y A ***************** \ \ / / CSUFBO @ EVRES RO TSISER @ ELGIEVNI @ EVIECED @ ET E @ \ V / E _______________________________________________ O L \ / V |Juan Carlos Castro y Castro | H S / \ E |jcastro@p...

I want to install a linux samba server to serve 30 win9x machines. I want to prevent users from writing on the local drives, they should have write access only to their home dirs on the samba box. These users have a nasty habit of deleting crucial system files. Is it at all possible with win9x and samba? Of course NT workstations could resolve the problem, but that's not an option with these

I'm sure this is a FAQ, though I couldn't find it in any FAQ or the docs... How do I have Samba authenticate users via the local UNIX passwd file? -- Gregor Mosheh An NT server can be run by an idiot, and usually is. "If you can't make it good, make it LOOK good." - Bill Gates

...RDES! E OGY IS POLICY @ THE END HCONIPLECRACALNESARDUPETEUQ*LIAJNITORT L ***************** O * FIGHT * UST NO ONE @ DE E @ BELIEVE THE LIE @ AP * THE * R N T * FUTURE!!! * T ___THE___ Y A ***************** \ \ / / CSUFBO @ EVRES RO TSISER @ ELGIEVNI @ EVIECED @ ET E @ \ V / E _______________________________________________ O L \ / V |Juan Carlos Castro y Castro | H S / \ E |jcastro@pcshop.co...

...RDES! E OGY IS POLICY @ THE END HCONIPLECRACALNESARDUPETEUQ*LIAJNITORT L ***************** O * FIGHT * UST NO ONE @ DE E @ BELIEVE THE LIE @ AP * THE * R N T * FUTURE!!! * T ___THE___ Y A ***************** \ \ / / CSUFBO @ EVRES RO TSISER @ ELGIEVNI @ EVIECED @ ET E @ \ V / E _______________________________________________ O L \ / V |Juan Carlos Castro y Castro | H S / \ E |jcastro@pcshop.co...

...ws me to specify users NOT in a group? Something like read list = !@writers Cheers, -- LOGY IS POLICY @ THE END UST NO ONE @ DE E @ BELI O *************************** R N T EVE THE LIE @ AP * FIGHT THE FUTURE!!! * T ___THE___ Y A *************************** \ \ / / CSUFBO @ EVRES RO TSISER @ ELGIEVNI @ EVIECED @ ET E @ \ V / E _______________________________________________ O L \ / V |Juan Carlos Castro y Castro | H S / \ E |jcastro@p...

...such a situation? Remove the preloaded cache for the worldwide root servers in BIND? I feel like the surviving victim at the end of a Freddy Krueger/Jason movie -- you're alive, but you know there'll be that last scene where the monster hints at its reappearance in the sequel. Cheers, -- ___THE___ One man alone cannot fight the future. USE LINUX! \ \ / / _______________________________________________ \ V / |Juan Carlos Castro y Castro | \ / |jcastro@pcshop.com.br | / \ |Linuxeiro, alvinegro, X-Phile e Carioca Folgado|...

Hi, The 'socket options' option IPTOS_LOWDELAY no longer works in 2.0.2. I had this parameter set in 1.9.18p10 however now when a samba process is started a warning of 'Unknown socket option IPTOS_LOWDELAY' is displayed. The man for smb.conf states the following: You may find that on some systems Samba will say "Unknown socket option"

I got mcp mag a day or two ago, Great writeup!! I was a little surprised that they ran such a glowing review of samba, with some of the negative implications on NT. It is very nice to see Microsoft show an interest in interoperability. -Steve Roylance > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeremy Allison [SMTP:jallison@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com] > Sent: Thursday, April 15, 1999 6:41 PM >

...ody that uses these reports enormous performance boosts (including ME!). If this causes any kind of unstability in other systems, ./configure could use them only in systems in which tey work (Linux for instance). I say this because of those M$-paid "benchmarks" of Samba x NT. Cya, -- ___THE___ "Commercial OS vendors are, at the moment, all closed \ \ / / economies, and doomed to fall in their competition with \ V / open economies just as communism eventually fell." \ / -- H. Reiser, Unix OS developer / \ _______________________...

I am implementing the latest version of Samba on HP-UX 11.0. The build and install went without obvious errors or problems. I have a Win95 (old version, no service packs loaded), 2 Win98, and 1 WinNT 4 SP4 machines which I am testing with. The 95 machine works fine. The 98 machine's can see the samba server but are denied access and the NT machine can't even see the server and reports

I have an old dos app that doesn't run in the win95 shell very well. There are problems with the graphics. Is it possible to connect to a samba server from real dos? I assume the answer is no but I thought I would check. Verne Ball vball@socrates.berkeley.edu

Because, a bug in a sofware, I need to see (on a NT box) the name of files in upercase. The files are writen by a buggy UNIX process in lowercase. Any one have idea ? Didier JANNE Janne@securite.org

The Samba FAQ mentions a program called timesync to update the system clock on clients from the server. The download address in the FAQ is out of date - where can I get a copy ? Geoff -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever sit and watch ants? They're always busy with Geoff Short something, never stop for a moment. I just

I have samba installed on a web server (behind a firewall). It's working fine with all the WINS networking here (eg, password authentication from the NT servers, etc). I (we) want this web server - a linux redhat 5.x box currently running samba-1.9.18p8 - to have as few actual unix login accounts as possible. What I want/need to do is to allow LOTS of people in the faculty here