search for: 9600bps

.../FXS hardware restricts this kind of a setup to lower data transmission rates, is this correct? Currently, we only transmit at 1200bps, is this rate problematic with Digium cards? Up to what data transmission rate are Digium cards known to work reliable? We do not think we'll ever go beyond 9600bps, can we do this with a let's say TDM400P? Will future Digium hardware improve the situation or will this stay the same in the future? How is hardware from other vendors performing when using analog modems? Thanks for any information on this, Christian Schnell. REKOBA GmbH Berlin

...Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 R8x15.4lines/mm Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm) North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm) DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 20ms Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 Start sending document Start tx document Changed from phase 2 to 4 >>> DCS: 83 00 86 80 80 80 00 HDLC underflow in state 3 Chang...

I am so fed up with Digium cards. My company first owned a TE410P, I installed it in a Dell server and "enjoyed" its instability (we bought it months before Digium warned about the incompatibility issues). Then we switched to a TE411P for the hardware echo cancellation. Now we want to receive fax (< 20/day) on it and guess what ? Since April 2006 (again a few months after we bought

Hi all, A recent thread inspired me to try getting a proper serial console working on a Supermicro X9SCL motherboard with IPMI. However I find that while I see loader messages and the getty I enabled after boot I don't get any kernel messages which does somewhat limit the utility.. The BMC creates COM3 (/dev/cuau2) which works with getty. I modified /boot/loader.conf like so..

HI All. I'm using tiff-v.3.5.7 and spandsp-0.0.1k with latest * cvs on Slackware-10.0. Here is debug messages from * console. Please advise. Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 0ms Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Training failed (sequence failed) Fast carrier training failed Fast carrier down Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1699.96 (66) Training error 2...

...Slow carrier up <<< TSI: 43 33 30 31 33 39 37 20 31 32 38 20 39 34 2b 20 20 20 20 20 20 TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: "+49 821 793103" <<< DCS: 83 00 86 10 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 5ms Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Fast carrier down Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1700.05 (66) Training error 2.676352 Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 4.690531) Fa...

...or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK Metric-based resolution preferred Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm) North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm) Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic DCS: Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 20ms Start sending document Start tx document - compression 2 Fine mode Changed from phase 2 to 4 Sending ident >>> TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 >>> DCS...

...es to cooperate in this setup. I figure it must be my fax machine and the baud rate. You see, I have a Brother MFC8300 that's hardwired to 14400bps. I'm thinking that the Azacall will support up to 14400bps (like the later Cisco ATA-186's will) but the Sipura will only support up to 9600bps. I emailed Sipura to find out and all they could manage to tell me was... === "You will have better reliability when using 9600bps when using fax. (along with G711, etc..) T.38 fax support for SPA-2100 will be available Q2" === Gee thanks guys! You could just say "We're too l...

...y this to be done is if I use something like this : rate 0 ceil desired-speed but is this possible, or if not what is the lowest possible value.... - Will proirity have be taken into account so that i can say some should be served better than other ? - the lower possible bandwith i will lend is 9600bps .. yes we have such speeds the price here is big :"( Thanx alot raptor _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/

...rrier up <<< TSI: 43 30 36 37 37 36 31 36 35 20 35 34 2b 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: "+45 56167760" <<< DCS: 83 00 46 20 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 10ms Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Fast carrier down Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1699.97 (66) Training error 37.103968 Training s...

...Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 >>> DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01 HDLC underflow in state 9 Changed from phase 4 to 3 Slow carrier up <<< DCS: 83 00 c6 f0 80 80 00 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 0ms Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1832.96 (4) Training e...

...use app_fax to receive a fax using T.38, I get very low transmission rates, and about 30% of the faxes are just not transmitted at all. 2400bps is not uncommon. If instead of T.38 I use an analog landline connected to that very same Asterisk box, app_fax works wonderfully well transmitting at full 9600bps. Just to rule out Asterisk's T.38 handling, I noticed that Fax For Asterisk works perfectly with T.38, also on that same box. I'll be happy to provide you any info that could help solve this issue. Atenciosamente, Vin?cius Fontes Gerente de Seguran?a da Informa??o Canall Tecnologia em C...

...4 to 3 Slow carrier up <<< TSI: 43 31 37 31 31 36 35 34 35 34 38 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: "xxxx" <<< DCS: 83 00 86 90 00 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 5ms Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Fast carrier down Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1699.90 (64) Training error 56.874846 Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 44.212022)...

...igher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 >>> DIS: 80 00 ce f0 80 80 01 HDLC underflow in state 9 Changed from phase 4 to 3 Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up <<< DCS: 83 00 86 90 00 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 5ms Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1699.95 (48) Training error 35.626009 Training succeeded (constellation mismatch 34.276778) Fast carrier trained Fast carrier...

...t final frame tag > Remote fax gave TSI as: "+49 911 2369697 " > <<< DCS: 83 00 46 f0 00 > DCS with final frame tag > In state 9 > DCS: > Store and forward Internet fax: no > Real-time Internet fax: no > Can receive fax > Data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps > R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK > Scan line length: 215mm > Recording length: A4 (297mm) > Minimum scan line time: 0ms > Get at V.29 > Changed from phase 3 to 5 > Fast carrier up > Fast carrier down > Changed from phase 5 to 4 > 0 bad bits in trainability...

Hi all, After a long time having no time, I have finally done some fresh work on my software fax machine. I have replaced the original carrier tracking with something more robust. I have also added 4800, and 2400 bits per second modes, and cleaned up a few bugs in areas like superfine mode operation. I apologise for this update taking so long. At ftp://ftp.opencall.org/pub/spandsp you will

...3 33 33 30 20 36 39 36 20 32 31 34 TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: "412 696 0333 " <<< DCS: 83 00 46 78 00 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Store and forward Internet fax: no Real-time Internet fax: no Can receive fax Data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: B4 (364mm) Minimum scan line time: 0ms Get at V.29 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Fast carrier down Changed from phase 5 to 4 0 bad bits in trainability test Start rx document - compression 1 Start rx p...

...3 Slow carrier up <<< TSI: 43 37 30 38 30 35 33 31 33 33 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: "031xxxxx" <<< DCS: 83 00 86 a0 00 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 10ms Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Floating point exception [root@pbx asterisk]# Ouch ... error while writing audio data: : Broken pipe Ouch ... error while writing audio data: : Broken...

...256 Can receive fax Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm) Receiver's minimum scan line time: 0ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 DCS: Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 0ms Start sending document Start tx document - compression 1 Fine mode Changed from phase 2 to 4 Sending ident >>> TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 >>> DCS: 83 00 44 70...

...Slow carrier up <<< TSI: 43 37 30 38 30 35 33 31 33 33 30 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 TSI without final frame tag Remote fax gave TSI as: "0331350807" <<< DCS: 83 00 86 a0 00 DCS with final frame tag In state 9 DCS: Can receive fax Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 10ms Get at 9600 Changed from phase 3 to 5 Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1713.21 (13) Fast carrier down Fast carrier up Coarse carrier frequency 1699.33 (86) Fast carrier training failed Fast carrie...