I'm getting the following when sending to a specific fax machine. Any ideas? File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/email2fax/7F2SOeYJiU.tif' Changed from phase 0 to 2 Slow carrier up Slow carrier down Slow carrier up <<< NSF: 20 00 00 11 80 00 8a 49 10 53 54 49 52 4c 49 4e 47 20 43 4f 56 49 4e 47 54 00 67 00 80 80 80 0c 01 02 NSF without final frame tag The remote is made by 'Canon' <<< DIS: 80 20 ee 88 c4 80 95 80 80 80 38 DIS with final frame tag In state 10 DIS: V.8 capable Preferred octets: 256 Can receive fax Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17 R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm) Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 Error correction mode T.6 coding R8x15.4lines/mm OK R16x15.4lines/mm and/or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK Metric-based resolution preferred Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm) North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm) Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic DCS: Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps 2D coding OK Scan line length: 215mm Recording length: A4 (297mm) Minimum scan line time: 20ms Start sending document Start tx document - compression 2 Fine mode Changed from phase 2 to 4 Sending ident>>> TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 >>> DCS: 83 00 c4 00HDLC underflow in state 3 Changed from phase 4 to 6 Changed from phase 6 to 3 Slow carrier up <<< XCN: fa XCN with final frame tag In state 4 Disconnecting Changed from phase 3 to 7 Changed from phase 7 to 8 -- Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111 "In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss."
Hi Eric ! I have the same problem with Canon fax mashine as you have. I have wrote an email to Steve (developer of spandsp) some weeks ago and got no answer how to fix the problem :( Looks like connection was dropped by fax mashine without any reason ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Wieling" <eric@fnords.org> To: <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:19 PM Subject: [Asterisk-Users] TxFax/SpanDSP problems> I'm getting the following when sending to a specific fax machine. Any > ideas? > > File name is '/var/spool/asterisk/email2fax/7F2SOeYJiU.tif' > Changed from phase 0 to 2 > Slow carrier up > Slow carrier down > Slow carrier up > <<< NSF: 20 00 00 11 80 00 8a 49 10 53 54 49 52 4c 49 4e 47 20 43 4f 56 > 49 4e 47 54 00 67 00 80 80 80 0c 01 02 > NSF without final frame tag > The remote is made by 'Canon' > <<< DIS: 80 20 ee 88 c4 80 95 80 80 80 38 > DIS with final frame tag > In state 10 > DIS: > V.8 capable > Preferred octets: 256 > Can receive fax > Supported data signalling rates: V.27ter, V.29 and V.17 > R8x7.7lines/mm and/or 200x200pels/25.4mm OK > 2D coding OK > Scan line length: 215mm > Recording length: A4 (297mm) and B4 (364mm) > Receiver's minimum scan line time: 20ms at 3.85 l/mm: T7.7 = T3.85 > Error correction mode > T.6 coding > R8x15.4lines/mm OK > R16x15.4lines/mm and/or 400x400pels/25.4 mm OK > Metric-based resolution preferred > Minimum scan line time for higher resolutions: T15.4 = T7.7 > North American Letter (215.9mm x 279.4mm) > North American Legal (215.9mm x 355.6mm) > Single-progression sequential coding (Rec. T.85) basic > DCS: > Selected data signalling rate: V.29, 9600bps > 2D coding OK > Scan line length: 215mm > Recording length: A4 (297mm) > Minimum scan line time: 20ms > Start sending document > Start tx document - compression 2 > Fine mode > Changed from phase 2 to 4 > Sending ident > >>> TSI: 43 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 > >>> DCS: 83 00 c4 00 > HDLC underflow in state 3 > Changed from phase 4 to 6 > Changed from phase 6 to 3 > Slow carrier up > <<< XCN: fa > XCN with final frame tag > In state 4 > Disconnecting > Changed from phase 3 to 7 > Changed from phase 7 to 8 > > -- > Eric Wieling * BTEL Consulting * 504-899-1387 x2111 > "In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows > upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss." > > _______________________________________________ > Asterisk-Users mailing list > Asterisk-Users@lists.digium.com > lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users > To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit: > lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users