search for: 64cores

...#39;t forget to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)! > > Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest > supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD based servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads and we didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. Also, looking at TOP500 list there are not so many POWER systems anymore. IBM could change this now. Regards, Simon

...CentOS alive)! >>> Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest >>> supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. >> What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD based >> servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads and >> we >> didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. > > As a matter of interest, did you look at IBM's own Power Systems (IBM > System i, AS/400, System p, as was)? They promote some of these models > as having very powerful process...

...CentOS alive)! >>> Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time.? The fastest >>> supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. >> What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD based >> servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads >> and we >> didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. >> >> Also, looking at TOP500 list there are not so many POWER systems >> anymore. >> IBM could change this now. >> >> Regards, >> Simon >> >&g...

> > On Sun, October 28, 2018 6:07 pm, mark wrote: >> On 10/28/18 17:54, Zube wrote: >>> On Sun Oct 28 10:20:31 PM, Alain p??an wrote: >>> >>>> Le 28/10/2018 ?? 22:10, Albert McCann a ??crit??: >>>>> Damn, this is bad enough to make one weep. >>>> >>>> Red Hat would stay as a distinct entity inside IBM. IBM has also

...to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)! >> Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest >> supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. > What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD based > servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads and we > didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. > > Also, looking at TOP500 list there are not so many POWER systems anymore. > IBM could change this now. > > Regards, > Simon > > _______________________________________________ >...

...to keep Fedora/CentOS alive)! >> Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest >> supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. > What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD based > servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads and we > didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. As a matter of interest, did you look at IBM's own Power Systems (IBM System i, AS/400, System p, as was)? They promote some of these models as having very powerful processing capabilities but I wonder ho...

...alive)! >> >> Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest >> supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. > > What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD > based > servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads and > we > didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. > > Also, looking at TOP500 list there are not so many POWER systems > anymore. > IBM could change this now. IBM's Power8 and Power9 servers run 8 threads per core, so a 24 core Power...

...t; Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The >>>> fastest supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. >>> What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD >>> based servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with >>> 64Cores/128Threads and >>> we didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. >> >> As a matter of interest, did you look at IBM's own Power Systems (IBM >> System i, AS/400, System p, as was)? They promote some of these models >> as having very power...

...gt;>>> Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest >>>> supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. >>> What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD based >>> servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads and >>> we >>> didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. >> As a matter of interest, did you look at IBM's own Power Systems (IBM >> System i, AS/400, System p, as was)? They promote some of these models >> as having very p...

...;>> Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest >>> supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. >> >> What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD >> based >> servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads and >> we >> didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. >> >> Also, looking at TOP500 list there are not so many POWER systems >> anymore. >> IBM could change this now. > > IBM's Power8 and Power9 servers run 8 threads...

...t; Er, RHEL has been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest >>>> supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. >>> What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD >>> based >>> servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads >>> and we >>> didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. >>> >>> Also, looking at TOP500 list there are not so many POWER systems >>> anymore. >>> IBM could change this now. >>> >>> Regards...

...been running on Power for a very long time. The fastest >>>>> supercomputer in the world is Power9 + RHEL. >>>> What I meant is that POWER could become a competitor for Intel/AMD >>>> based >>>> servers. We're now running AMD EPYC servers with 64Cores/128Threads >>>> and >>>> we >>>> didn't find any POWER system which could compete in this area. >>> As a matter of interest, did you look at IBM's own Power Systems (IBM >>> System i, AS/400, System p, as was)? They promote some of these...