search for: 600x

Hi All, I'm just posting this questions to both forums as its related to both. In hope to get some help on below issue: Asterisk 1.4.x CCM = 4.x CME = 4.x codec = g711ulaw Here is my setup: 600X Phones ----> Asterisk ---- SIP Trunk ----> Call Manager -----> CME -----> 461X Phones 461X Phones ----> CME -----> my dial peer points to Asterisk IP for 600X Phones so in the above setup I'm able to call from Asterisk to my CME and vice-versa. here is my problem: when I c...

...ns : 1- Into my log, i see a very big quantity of : [19391]: lookupname ECTPP/root [2005/12/09 14:28:46, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_lookupname(695) [19391]: lookupname ECTPP/root [2005/12/09 14:28:46, 3] nsswitch/winbindd_async.c:winbindd_dual_lookupname(695) 10x per s .... 600x/minutes .. it's very very big no ? It's possible that is Spamassassin that create this request ? i use winbind only for squid, can i del into pam winbind for no other process use it ? 2- Into my log, i have a new logs created : log.wb-BUILTIN i see that winbind create a log file fo...

...t string from the config file via the Windows 2000 Network tools. Server: Rhat 7.1 Intel 1.2 GHz PIII 2U server - plenty of everything, disk space, ram memory 512 mb, etc. Two Clients: Windows 2000 AMD 1.2 GHz box - plenty of everything, disk space, ram memory 512 mb, etc. Rhat 7.1 IBM 600X Thinkpad - 600 Mhz PIII w/ 20 GB disk space and 64 mb memory - PCMCIA adaptor. ** I would like to start a conversation via e-mail with someone on your team to get me back on track. ** Can you help. Steven Steven L. Sprague Large Enterprise Direct Advisory Project Manager (919) 486-9879; T/L 526...

...ght as well start by reusing as much as possible. Exceptions are very common in OCaml though. Is my 6x result a fair quantitative estimate of how much faster exceptions could be make in this system for my compiler if it were customized? If so, I don't think that is a problem: exceptions are 600x slower in F# than in OCaml! -- Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd. http://www.ffconsultancy.com/products/?e

On Nov 25, 2007, at 11:49, Jon Harrop wrote: > On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:23, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > >> On 2007-11-24, at 21:58, Jon Harrop wrote: >> >>> - Exceptions >> >> http://llvm.org/docs/ExceptionHandling.html >> >> LLVM's exception support is tuned toward DWARF "zero-cost >> exceptions," i.e. C++ exception

I (cannot sleep and I) am thinking if there is a way to make inwards billing easy possible. To dial out we use something like: exten => _9011N.,4,DeadAGI(astcc.agi,${CALLERID(num)},${EXTEN:${TRUNKMSD}},${TARIFF}) (I have an extra field TARIFF, what allows me to use different prices for different users) To dial to a phone we use something like: exten => 888888888,1,Dial(SIP/6001,20,tr)

Hello. I'm running WoW 2.3.3, my wine version is wine-0.9.56. My PC: 512 ram, Athlon 300+ and ATI radeon 600x. Problem: 4pfs under Arch Linux and up to 12 under Ubuntu. Drivers: Fglrx (catalyst-8.3-1) Rendering: Yes Code: glxinfo |grep direct direct rendering: Yes fglrxinfo display: :0.0 screen: 0 OpenGL vendor string: ATI Technologies Inc. OpenGL renderer string: RADEON X600/X550 Series OpenGL version...

...at calls "printf". "printf" is I/O bound and makes for a lousy > performance test. > > Nevertheless, I've attached the .s file generated by LLVM from the IR > you gave. I can't see anything obviously wrong with it. Please point > out in it which parts are 600x slower than on Windows. I'm not able to > run it because I don't have a Windows box, and it requires some > Windows calls. > > Note: The ASM is for a Darwin box. I didn't generate this code with > frame pointers disabled. This would improve performance, but you > didn...

The following C test program was compiled using LLVM with -O3 option and MSVC with /O2. The MSVC one is about 600 times faster than the one compiled with the LLVM. We can see that the for loop in MSVC assembler is solved in the optimization pass more efficiently than that in LLVM. Is there an way to get a optimization result in LLVM like that of the MSVC? Manoel Teixeira #include

....gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Hi All, please provide some help. I'm just posting this questions to both forums as its related to both. In hope to get some help on below issue: Asterisk 1.4.x CCM = 4.x CME = 4.x codec = g711ulaw Here is my setup: 600X Phones ----> Asterisk ---- SIP Trunk ----> Call Manager -----> CME -----> 461X Phones 461X Phones ----> CME -----> my dial peer points to Asterisk IP for 600X Phones so in the above setup I'm able to call from Asterisk to my CME and vice-versa. here is my problem: when I c...

On Sunday 25 November 2007 12:23, Gordon Henriksen wrote: > On 2007-11-24, at 21:58, Jon Harrop wrote: > > - Garbage collection tuned for functional programming > > http://llvm.org/docs/GarbageCollection.html > > I've been doing some interesting work on this front. Getting Lattner- > cycles to have it reviewed and integrated is probably the biggest > challenge; LLVM

This might be a stupid question, but here goes... Would adding, say, 4 4 or 8gb usb keys as a zil make enough of a difference for writes on an iscsi shared vol? I am finding reads are not too bad (40is mb/s over gige on 2 500gb drives stripped) but writes top out at about 10 and drop a lot lower... If I where to add a couple usb keys for zil, would it make a difference? Thanks. Sent from a