search for: 5753

Hi, everybody. I have a list obj L, sth like $`aaa` [1] "5753" if the string 'aaa' is a returned value of a function foo(). what is the right syntax form of L$foo() I'm new to R, thanks in advance.

On Jan 4, 2018, at 12:18 PM, Walter H. <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > > will there be updates for these CVEs for CentOS 6? Red Hat hasn?t released them all yet. Quoting Christopher Robinson in the thread for this here: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0007 "We will be pushing errata out as soon as they have passed our QA team's testing. The more

I have released everything for CentOS-6 that has been released upstream in RHEL source code. I will continue to do so when they release new sources. NOTE: We will NOT be releasing anything for CentOS versions before CentOS-6 (ie, CentOS-2.1, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x releases in vault that are past EOL will not get updates) CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 will continue to get updates based on the specific version

How about kernel-lt and kernel-ml? Mike On 01/04/2018 05:41 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 4, 2018, at 12:18 PM, Walter H. <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: >> will there be updates for these CVEs for CentOS 6? > Red Hat hasn?t released them all yet. Quoting Christopher Robinson in the thread for this here: > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0007

Hello, will there be updates for these CVEs for CentOS 6? Thanks, Walter

...pactful depending on the workload. As such, the tunable can also be overridden by the end-user if they are willing to accept the risk. Initial work can be tracked at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13797. Please note this is a work in progress and some stuff is likely to be broken. Spectre (CVE-2017-5753 and CVE-2017-5715) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When it comes to the Spectre vulnerabilities, it is much harder to sort these out. Variant 1 (CVE-2017-5753) is going to require some static analysis to determine vulnerable use cases that will require barriers to stop speculation from di...

...pactful depending on the workload. As such, the tunable can also be overridden by the end-user if they are willing to accept the risk. Initial work can be tracked at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D13797. Please note this is a work in progress and some stuff is likely to be broken. Spectre (CVE-2017-5753 and CVE-2017-5715) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When it comes to the Spectre vulnerabilities, it is much harder to sort these out. Variant 1 (CVE-2017-5753) is going to require some static analysis to determine vulnerable use cases that will require barriers to stop speculation from di...

...r. Long term, your best bet is to try to get up to a new >> version of Xen that is under upstream security support, probably 4.8. > > Oracle VM 3.4 product is based on Xen 4.4, and they seem to have backported the fixes already.. > > It looks like those src.rpms have {CVE-2017-5753} {CVE-2017-5715} {CVE-2017-5754} fixes included. > > https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/oraclevm-errata/2018-January/thread.html > https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/oraclevm-errata/2018-January/000816.html > https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/oraclevm-errata/2018-January/000817.html > &...

Hi, I am very sorry to do this on short notice, but obviously Meltdown and Spectre are a lot more than anyone was really expecting to come down the pipeline. Xen 4.4 has been EOL upstream for about a year now and I have personally been reviewing and backporting patches based on the 4.5 versions made available upstream. Given that 4.5 is now also reaching EOL, backporting to 4.4 will become

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Don't populate the array vsoff on the stack but instead make it static. Makes the object code smaller by 67 bytes: Before: text data bss dec hex filename 5753 112 0 5865 16e9 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o After: text data bss dec hex filename 5622 176 0 5798 16a6 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o (gcc version 8.2.0 x86_64) Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> --- dr...

...samba] <defunct> root 3541 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 13:41 0:00 [samba] <defunct> root 4269 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 13:51 0:00 [samba] <defunct> root 5015 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:01 0:00 [samba] <defunct> root 5753 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:11 0:00 [samba] <defunct> root 6503 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:21 0:00 [samba] <defunct> root 7213 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:31 0:00 [samba] <defunct> root 7932 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?...

...time :) Installed it on my Solaris 8 box, restarted sshd, and connected to localhost. It works, basically, but I get ... debug1: Entering interactive session. Warning: no access to tty (Inappropriate ioctl for device). Thus no job control in this shell. and also May 20 18:01:01 localhost sshd[5753]: error: open /dev/tty failed - could not set controlling tty: No such device or address in sylog, and when I exit the shell via ^D, I have to ^C, too, to get back to the original shell. I think the problem is not on the client side, because it works fine when connecting to another Sol8 box (ru...

Hi list, I'm getting an error on a E1 link to the telco, after some weeks of operation without trouble. I have an asterisk with a TE405 in passtrough mode: two E1 are connected to the Telco, two E1 are connected to 2 Siemens PaBX. Only 15 channels are used on each E1 (conf is attached).The system has been in production for nearly a year, and does work flawlessly for weeks, then I

...efunct> > > > root 4269 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 13:51 > > > 0:00 [samba] > > > <defunct> > > > root 5015 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:01 > > > 0:00 [samba] > > > <defunct> > > > root 5753 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:11 > > > 0:00 [samba] > > > <defunct> > > > root 6503 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:21 > > > 0:00 [samba] > > > <defunct> > > > root 7213 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z...

From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> Don't populate the array vsoff on the stack but instead make it static. Makes the object code smaller by 67 bytes: Before: text data bss dec hex filename 5753 112 0 5865 16e9 drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o After: text data bss dec hex filename 5622 176 0 5798 16a6 drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o (gcc version 8.2.0 x86_64) Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> --- dr...

...23, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King <colin.king at canonical.com> > > Don't populate the array vsoff on the stack but instead make it > static. Makes the object code smaller by 67 bytes: > > Before: > text data bss dec hex filename > 5753 112 0 5865 16e9 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o > > After: > text data bss dec hex filename > 5622 176 0 5798 16a6 .../nouveau/nvkm/subdev/bios/dp.o > > (gcc version 8.2.0 x86_64) > > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King &lt...

...rom > each other. Long term, your best bet is to try to get up to a new > version of Xen that is under upstream security support, probably 4.8. > Oracle VM 3.4 product is based on Xen 4.4, and they seem to have backported the fixes already.. It looks like those src.rpms have {CVE-2017-5753} {CVE-2017-5715} {CVE-2017-5754} fixes included. https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/oraclevm-errata/2018-January/thread.html https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/oraclevm-errata/2018-January/000816.html https://oss.oracle.com/pipermail/oraclevm-errata/2018-January/000817.html http://oss.oracle.com/orac...

...0 0 ? Z 13:41 > 0:00 [samba] > <defunct> > root 4269 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 13:51 > 0:00 [samba] > <defunct> > root 5015 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:01 > 0:00 [samba] > <defunct> > root 5753 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:11 > 0:00 [samba] > <defunct> > root 6503 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:21 > 0:00 [samba] > <defunct> > root 7213 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? Z 14:31 > 0:00 [samba] > <defunct> >...

...nd a draft that explains the format for public key. But I could not find any documentation as to how the private keys are stored. Can any one point me to a document that explains the private key file format? Thanks in advance. ? Regards Sai Pullabhotla President jMethods, Inc. Phone: (402) 408-5753 Fax: (402) 408-6861 www.jMethods.com ? ?

...Seems wrong > but ... > > I am working on a solution using realtime queues but it really isn't optimal. > > Did you ever find a solution? > > > Phil Hopkins > MIS Manager > BexarMet Water District > 2047 W. Malone > San Antonio, TX 78225 > office - 210-357-5753 > cell - 210-279-9720 >