Hello, will there be updates for these CVEs for CentOS 6? Thanks, Walter
Warren Young
2018-Jan-04 22:41 UTC
[CentOS] CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2017-5753 and CVE-2017-5754
On Jan 4, 2018, at 12:18 PM, Walter H. <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote:> > will there be updates for these CVEs for CentOS 6?Red Hat hasn?t released them all yet. Quoting Christopher Robinson in the thread for this here: https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0007 "We will be pushing errata out as soon as they have passed our QA team's testing. The more modern versions were easier to backport patches from upstream, and as you progress backwards the fixes change from a backporting exercise into a complete rewrite. We expect all packages for RHEL7 to be available shortly, with RHEL6 following closely behind.? Robinson?s reply then goes into other ramifications which don?t impact CentOS for one reason or another, except insofar as CentOS?s speed in responding to this is gated in large part by Red Hat?s ability to respond.
Johnny Hughes
2018-Jan-05 14:02 UTC
[CentOS] CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2017-5753 and CVE-2017-5754
I have released everything for CentOS-6 that has been released upstream in RHEL source code. I will continue to do so when they release new sources. NOTE: We will NOT be releasing anything for CentOS versions before CentOS-6 (ie, CentOS-2.1, 3.x, 4.x, 5.x releases in vault that are past EOL will not get updates) CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 will continue to get updates based on the specific version of RHEL source code released. Thanks, Johnny Hughes On 01/04/2018 04:41 PM, Warren Young wrote:> On Jan 4, 2018, at 12:18 PM, Walter H. <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: >> >> will there be updates for these CVEs for CentOS 6? > > Red Hat hasn?t released them all yet. Quoting Christopher Robinson in the thread for this here: > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0007 > > "We will be pushing errata out as soon as they have passed our QA team's testing. The more modern versions were easier to backport patches from upstream, and as you progress backwards the fixes change from a backporting exercise into a complete rewrite. We expect all packages for RHEL7 to be available shortly, with RHEL6 following closely behind.? > > Robinson?s reply then goes into other ramifications which don?t impact CentOS for one reason or another, except insofar as CentOS?s speed in responding to this is gated in large part by Red Hat?s ability to respond. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos >-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20180105/8fdb5a88/attachment-0001.sig>
Mike McCarthy, W1NR
2018-Jan-07 16:11 UTC
[CentOS] CVE-2017-5715, CVE-2017-5753 and CVE-2017-5754
How about kernel-lt and kernel-ml? Mike On 01/04/2018 05:41 PM, Warren Young wrote:> On Jan 4, 2018, at 12:18 PM, Walter H. <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: >> will there be updates for these CVEs for CentOS 6? > Red Hat hasn?t released them all yet. Quoting Christopher Robinson in the thread for this here: > > https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0007 > > "We will be pushing errata out as soon as they have passed our QA team's testing. The more modern versions were easier to backport patches from upstream, and as you progress backwards the fixes change from a backporting exercise into a complete rewrite. We expect all packages for RHEL7 to be available shortly, with RHEL6 following closely behind.? > > Robinson?s reply then goes into other ramifications which don?t impact CentOS for one reason or another, except insofar as CentOS?s speed in responding to this is gated in large part by Red Hat?s ability to respond. > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list > CentOS at centos.org > https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos