search for: 55am

...> /bin/sh -c cd /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night && ./testr > wanderer 10006 0.0 0.2 1800 1040 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.01 > /bin/sh - ./testrun > wanderer 10011 0.0 0.4 3020 2332 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.06 [perl] > wanderer 35234 0.0 0.2 1796 1032 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.00 sh -c > (time -p gmake -j2 -l3.0 -C test Feature.t) > /home/w > wanderer 35235 0.0 0.1 1308 576 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.00 time > -p gmake -j2 -l3.0 -C test Feature.t > wanderer 35236 0.0 0.2 2604 1224 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.03 gmake > -j2 -l3.0 -C test...

...Is 2:13AM 0:00.01 /bin/sh -c cd /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night && ./testr wanderer 10006 0.0 0.2 1800 1040 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.01 /bin/sh - ./testrun wanderer 10011 0.0 0.4 3020 2332 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.06 [perl] wanderer 35234 0.0 0.2 1796 1032 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.00 sh -c (time -p gmake -j2 -l3.0 -C test Feature.t) > /home/w wanderer 35235 0.0 0.1 1308 576 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.00 time -p gmake -j2 -l3.0 -C test Feature.t wanderer 35236 0.0 0.2 2604 1224 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.03 gmake -j2 -l3.0 -C test Feature.t wanderer 35319 0....

>> > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is >> > going >> > on >> >> No. You can see problem with Feature tests at >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results >> section ) > > I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion > because (I

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:01:55AM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > Sure thing. Also, feel free to let me know if you'd like access to one of the > systems we saw breaking with this patch - I'm fairly sure I've got one of them > locally at my apartment and don't mind setting up AMT/KVM/SSH Probably no need for re...

...cd /home/wanderer/pkg/build/llvm/night && ./testr >> wanderer 10006 0.0 0.2 1800 1040 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.01 >> /bin/sh - ./testrun >> wanderer 10011 0.0 0.4 3020 2332 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.06 [perl] >> wanderer 35234 0.0 0.2 1796 1032 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.00 sh -c >> (time -p gmake -j2 -l3.0 -C test Feature.t) > /home/w >> wanderer 35235 0.0 0.1 1308 576 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.00 time >> -p gmake -j2 -l3.0 -C test Feature.t >> wanderer 35236 0.0 0.2 2604 1224 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.03 gmake >&gt...

...r/pkg/build/llvm/night && ./testr >>> wanderer 10006 0.0 0.2 1800 1040 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.01 >>> /bin/sh - ./testrun >>> wanderer 10011 0.0 0.4 3020 2332 ?? I 2:13AM 0:00.06 [perl] >>> wanderer 35234 0.0 0.2 1796 1032 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.00 sh >>> -c (time -p gmake -j2 -l3.0 -C test Feature.t) > /home/w >>> wanderer 35235 0.0 0.1 1308 576 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.00 time >>> -p gmake -j2 -l3.0 -C test Feature.t >>> wanderer 35236 0.0 0.2 2604 1224 ?? I 2:55AM 0:00.03...

On 9/24/20 3:24 AM, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:30:55AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> --- linux-next-20200917.orig/drivers/vdpa/Kconfig >>>> +++ linux-next-20200917/drivers/vdpa/Kconfig >>>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ config IFCVF >>>> >>>> config MLX5_VDPA >>>> bool "MLX5 VD...

On 9/24/20 3:24 AM, Eli Cohen wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 05:30:55AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >>>> --- linux-next-20200917.orig/drivers/vdpa/Kconfig >>>> +++ linux-next-20200917/drivers/vdpa/Kconfig >>>> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ config IFCVF >>>> >>>> config MLX5_VDPA >>>> bool "MLX5 VD...

Hi everybody! At least xen 3.0 packages seem to be working, tested, and in a pretty good shape... (I haven't personally tested xen-unstable, so I cannot say) I propose releasing rev150 in unstable or at least experimental in the next few days... No, this is not a late april's fool... :D Comments? Ideas? Suggestions? Rants? Guido

> On May 14, 2019, at 5:50 AM, John R. Dennison <jrd at gerdesas.com> wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2019 at 05:19:57AM -0400, Bee.Lists wrote: >> OK I think you need to read previous posts on this. >> >> I?m not looking for any other command. > > Please stop top-posting, thank you. > > It's the _same command_; all it is is a different invocation

Hi All, The 2020 Virtual LLVM Developer's Meeting is coming up the week after next. I'll be hosting a JIT Birds-of-a-Feather session on Thursday the 8th at 10:55am PDT (See http://llvm.org/devmtg/2020-09/schedule/). I'm planning to run this more like a Round Table: Minimal introduction, plenty of time for discussion. Does anyone have any LLVM JIT related topics that they would particularly like to discuss at this session? Any questions that they think co...

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019, 11:15 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 03:06:55AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > > diff --git a/v2v/v2v.ml b/v2v/v2v.ml > > index 03590c9e..58bb06c3 100644 > > --- a/v2v/v2v.ml > > +++ b/v2v/v2v.ml > > @@ -739,7 +739,9 @@ and copy_targets cmdline targets input output = > > | TargetURI uri -> uri in &gt...

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > Duncan, > I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn > for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic > to work around without some additional substitute being added in...

Hi, My name is Vivek Pal. I had submitted a proposal on weighing schemes project for GSoC. I'm so glad and excited to be selected for working on this project! I'd like to thank mentors for reviewing & selecting my project proposa,l and letting me be a part of Xapian -- open source community. I'll make sure to keep up with all the expectations and try my best to produce good

Duncan, I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic to work around without some additional substitute being added in FSF gcc upstream? Jack

On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 06:53:05AM -0700, Peter Collingbourne wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2013 at 09:25:55AM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: > > Duncan, > > I was wondering if you plan on supporting the build of dragonegg under gcc 4.8.1svn > > for the llvm 3.3 release? Is the deprecation and poisoning of IDENT_ASM_OP too problematic > > to work around without some additional substi...

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 10:55:55AM -0500, Jason Warr wrote: > I think that you need to simplify #1 to: > > 1: Red Hat doesn't ship ZFS > > As that is really all that matters and so that people can't argue that you > are making a statement of knowledge about what/why Red Hat's lawyers have > decided...

On Sun, Feb 24, 2019 at 08:16:55AM +0000, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > Well yes, it could be used for the default domain, but what about the > 'DOMAIN' domain ? > > From my understanding, the default range is meant for the Well Known > SIDs and anything outside the given domains and there are less than tw...

On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:28:13PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 01:24:45PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:15:36AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > > > Getting rid of HMM_PFN_DEVICE_PRIVATE seems reasonable to me since a driver can > > > > look at the struct page but what if a driver needs to fault in a

On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:25 AM Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg at linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 01:37:12PM -0500, Patrick Volkerding wrote: > > On 7/21/20 10:27 AM, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:01:55AM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote: > > >> Sure thing. Also, feel free to let me know if you'd like access to one of the > > >> systems we saw breaking with this patch - I'm fairly sure I've got one of them > > >> locally at my apartment and don't mind setti...