> Vladimir Merzliakov wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> As I can see all nighttesters listed at >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ have problem with >> FeatureTests at 2004-11-01/2004-11-02 test run. >> >> In my case i manualy terminate nighttest script after 12 hours work. >> >> It problem resolved? >> >> Vladimir > > Hi Vladimir, > > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is going > onNo. You can see problem with Feature tests at http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results section )
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004, Vladimir Merzliakov wrote:> >> It problem resolved? > >> > >> Vladimir > > > > Hi Vladimir, > > > > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is going > > on > > No. You can see problem with Feature tests at > http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results > section )I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion because (I believe) of an upgrade that happened on the machine (the qmtest binary doesn't work anymore?). Are you seeing a problem on freebsd where the feature tests go into a loop? If so, can you provide us with more information? -Chris -- http://llvm.org/ http://nondot.org/sabre/
>> > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is >> > going >> > on >> >> No. You can see problem with Feature tests at >> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results >> section ) > > I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion > because (I believe) of an upgrade that happened on the machine (the qmtest > binary doesn't work anymore?). Are you seeing a problem on freebsd where > the feature tests go into a loop? If so, can you provide us with more > information? >Ok, but http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86-niobe/ and http://persephone.cs.uiuc.edu/~gaeke/nightlytest/ also have broken Feature Test Results section at 1-2 november and all ok at 31 october.