Mika Westerberg
2020-Jul-21 12:22 UTC
[Nouveau] nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"
Hi, [Sorry for the delay, I was on vacation] On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 01:32:10PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote:> Filed at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208597Thanks for reporting. I'll check your logs and try to figure if there is something we can do to make both nouveau and TBT working at the same time.> oddly enough I wasn't able to reproduce it on my XPS 9560, will ping > once something breaks.
Lyude Paul
2020-Jul-21 15:01 UTC
[Nouveau] nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"
Sure thing. Also, feel free to let me know if you'd like access to one of the systems we saw breaking with this patch - I'm fairly sure I've got one of them locally at my apartment and don't mind setting up AMT/KVM/SSH On Tue, 2020-07-21 at 15:22 +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:> Hi, > > [Sorry for the delay, I was on vacation] > > On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 01:32:10PM +0200, Karol Herbst wrote: > > Filed at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208597 > > Thanks for reporting. > > I'll check your logs and try to figure if there is something we can do > to make both nouveau and TBT working at the same time. > > > oddly enough I wasn't able to reproduce it on my XPS 9560, will ping > > once something breaks.-- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat
Mika Westerberg
2020-Jul-21 15:27 UTC
[Nouveau] nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:01:55AM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:> Sure thing. Also, feel free to let me know if you'd like access to one of the > systems we saw breaking with this patch - I'm fairly sure I've got one of them > locally at my apartment and don't mind setting up AMT/KVM/SSHProbably no need for remote access (thanks for the offer, though). I attached a test patch to the bug report: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208597 that tries to work it around (based on the ->pm_cap == 0). I wonder if anyone would have time to try it out.
Reasonably Related Threads
- nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"
- nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"
- nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"
- nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"
- nouveau regression with 5.7 caused by "PCI/PM: Assume ports without DLL Link Active train links in 100 ms"