search for: 44kbps

...bitrates. 24kbps > aacplus even kicks ass in my view. Is that 24kbps AACPLUS a full 44.1kHz stereo signal with frequencies preserved up to at least 15kHz? (Just curious, not criticising.) As a datapoint, Vorbis aotuv b4 gives acceptable quality with q=-1.001 44.1kHz stereo at approximately 44kbps. -- Paul Martin <pm@zetnet.net> (work) <pm@nowster.zetnet.co.uk> (home)

dear vorbis developers, it would be very useful, if oggenc would support constant low-bandwith bitrates for testing. something from 20kbps to 44kbps, so anyone could test streaming over modem and isdn. audio quality doesn't matter. mörk --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-dev-request@xiph.org' containing...

...reconfigure the client, they also send statistical data to Real that should stay private. I'm talking about free as in freedom, not as in "free beer". Apart from that, Real's software is a nuisance to use. It DOES perform well technically, e.g. in terms of quality at low bitrates (44kbps sounds almost as good as Vorbis' 48kbps ABR), but it's ressource hungry and not trustworthy, too. I wouldn't install and run any server that I (and everyone else) don't know about what it actually does, for both security and privacy reasons. I don't trust Real just like I don...

...> > Hi, > I am using Speex v.1.1.12 in a videoconference > software application, using WinXP and > Visual Studio .NET 2003. I am compiling Speex in > floating-point, 44kbps and UWB mode. Audio input > is 32Khz 16bit mono. > the "problem" is that some times there are input > signals produced by some mixers(hardware) in the > system (mic-mixer-encoder-network-decoder-speakers) >...

...nt, they also send statistical data to > Real that should stay private. I'm talking about free as in freedom, not > as in "free beer". Apart from that, Real's software is a nuisance to > use. It DOES perform well technically, e.g. in terms of quality at low > bitrates (44kbps sounds almost as good as Vorbis' 48kbps ABR), but it's > ressource hungry and not trustworthy, too. I wouldn't install and run > any server that I (and everyone else) don't know about what it actually > does, for both security and privacy reasons. I don't trust Real jus...

...bitrates. 24kbps > aacplus even kicks ass in my view. Is that 24kbps AACPLUS a full 44.1kHz stereo signal with frequencies preserved up to at least 15kHz? (Just curious, not criticising.) As a datapoint, Vorbis aotuv b4 gives acceptable quality with q=-1.001 44.1kHz stereo at approximately 44kbps. -- Paul Martin <pm@zetnet.net> (work) <pm@nowster.zetnet.co.uk> (home) _______________________________________________ Icecast mailing list Icecast@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/icecast

I'm am currently using autuvb4 at q-2 mono 44100. This produces roughly 28 to 34kb/s. It's ok but I've heard AACPlus at 32kb/s stereo and it's definately better, unfortunately. Regards, Ross. >> I'm hoping that Monty and others can improve Vorbis to start >> competing >> with AAC+ at low bitrates. Monty said he had some ideas but I wonder >> if

Rob Burris wrote: > Real Networks offers a free streamer called Real Server. I'm not sure of the > exact link, but here's a starting point That is definitely not free, it's not even zero cost after that evaluation year. There don't even exist any players for it except from Real ... i can't think of anything less free than that. :| I suggest ditching all that crap and to