search for: 4468

................................................ : ok gz concat ............................................................ : ok gz no concat ......................................................... : ok gz large header ...................................................... : ok 0 / 7 tests failed ==4468== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) ==4468==??? at 0x3A6160ACB2: ??? (in /usr/lib64/liblzma.so.0.0.0) ==4468==??? by 0x3A6160AEA9: ??? (in /usr/lib64/liblzma.so.0.0.0) ==4468==??? by 0x3A61603121: ??? (in /usr/lib64/liblzma.so.0.0.0) ==4468==??? by 0x3A616061A0: ??? (in /us...

You know, I was thinking: wouldn't it be nice to have RFC 4468 (Message Submission BURL Extension) support in dovecot? Maybe we should ask the guys from Apple to contribute some support for it, I have a gut feeling they would gladly do so ;) Kind regards -- Erik.

> Watch the output of 'pri debug span 1' on the Asterisk server while > placing the call - bug #4468 (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4468) > might be relevant. Yes, this is exactly what is happening. Thanks a lot. I am thinking about adding a special case for the IBM 800 number since it is the only one my company is complaining about. Currently I have this in my dialplan: ; outgoing ca...

...tk652/tk701/technologies_tech_ > note09186a0080094487.shtml > for the Cisco CallManager. > When comparing the log from a successful call to a failed call, I > noticed Asterisk was not passing back call-progress from the PSTN-span > to the PBX-span. http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4468 may have what you're looking for. If not, it sounds like a very similar problem. Likely you can work around it by issuing an Answer() to the Norstar before dialing out. That will satisfy the Norstars ISDN timers. Also, try enabling extended results on the Norstar - you should see a 'recov t...

Watch the output of 'pri debug span 1' on the Asterisk server while placing the call - bug #4468 (http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4468) might be relevant. > -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com > [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com]On Behalf Of Andy Goss > Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 5:58 AM > To: Asterisk Users Mailing Li...

...utdown: 30 ups.delay.start: 180 ups.load: 4 ups.productid: 5161 ups.status: OL ups.temperature: 25.0 ups.type: offline / line interactive ups.vendorid: 0665 However after a random amount of time I get the following error: blazer_usb[4466]: Permissions problem: Input/output error Followed by: upsd[4468]: Can't connect to UPS [EatonUPS] (blazer_usb-EatonUPS): No such file or directory upsmon[4566]: Poll UPS [EatonUPS at localhost] failed - Driver not connected upsmon[4566]: Communications with UPS EatonUPS at localhost lost upssched-cmd: Communications with the UPS EatonUPS at localhost are lo...

...as something to return and it works, but not really elegantly and returning wrong data when fails. Thanks in advance for any comments. Regards Oleg -- Dr Oleg Sklyar European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD England phone/fax +44(0)1223 49 4478/4468 e-mail osklyar@ebi.ac.uk

...39; then R understands --args as an output file and generates a file with that name. Does anyone has a solution for the problem? Best regards Oleg -- Dr Oleg Sklyar European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD England phone/fax +44(0)1223 49 4478/4468 e-mail osklyar at ebi.ac.uk

...ip 172.23.0.3 - asterisk 172.23.5.1/2 - voip phones any ideas/hints? 1170 25.028206000 172.23.0.3 -> 172.23.5.1 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x334508F6, Seq=49318, Time=1442112256 1171 25.045556000 172.23.5.1 -> 172.23.0.3 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x643C9869, Seq=4468, Time=716240 1172 25.045629000 172.23.0.3 -> 172.23.5.2 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x3566361, Seq=60990, Time=716240 1173 25.048134000 172.23.5.2 -> 172.23.0.3 RTP 214 PT=ITU-T G.711 PCMA, SSRC=0x8B41FC0A, Seq=274, Time=1442112421 1174 25.048207000 172.23.0.3 -> 172.23.5...

...2011/09/19 01:17:34.326221, 10] lib/dbwrap_tdb.c:44(db_tdb_record_destr) Unlocking key D2120000FFFFFFFF [2011/09/19 01:17:34.326258, 5] lib/messages.c:300(messaging_register) Overriding messaging pointer for type 1 - private_data=(nil) [2011/09/19 01:17:34.326375, 10] winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:4468(wcache_tdc_add_domain) wcache_tdc_add_domain: Adding domain BUILTIN (), SID S-1-5-32, flags = 0x0, attributes = 0x0, type = 0x0 [2011/09/19 01:17:34.326411, 10] winbindd/winbindd_cache.c:4277(pack_tdc_domains) pack_tdc_domains: Packing 1 trusted domains [2011/09/19 01:17:34.326437, 10] winbindd...

Hi Timo, There was another thread (it has come up at least a few times in the past few years I've been lurking) on the postfix list about having some kind of automatic 'Save to Sent' option to avoid the users mail client from having to upload messages twice (obviously the only ones of concern are ones with large attachments) - once to send it, and once to save the copy in the sent

Folks, Are there updated instructions on how to set up PXE boot under CentOS 5.x? I found that the system-config-netboot RPM has been absent, and the instructions written reference it, with a bug report not yet closed on Red Hat. Thanks, OSC http://www.centos.org/docs/5/html/Installation_Guide-en-US/s1-netboot-pxe-config.html http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0380.html -- Are we headed

...o: Sent RTP packet to 208.139.204.228:10102 (type 0, seq 9473, ts 135520, len 160) Sent RTP packet to 208.139.204.228:10102 (type 0, seq 9474, ts 135680, len 160) Got RTP packet from 208.139.204.228:10102 (type 0, seq 4467, ts 149600, len 160) Got RTP packet from 208.139.204.228:10102 (type 0, seq 4468, ts 149760, len 160) RTP Debug from MPC connection w/ bad audio: Sent RTP packet to 66.128.8.234:61414 (type 0, seq 3506, ts 51040, len 160) Sent RTP packet to 66.128.8.234:61414 (type 0, seq 3507, ts 51200, len 160) Got RTP packet from 66.128.8.234:61414 (type 0, seq 23701, ts 52480, len 80) Go...

...which loads /etc/asterisk/phone.conf. I did a lookup on voip-info and google and came across this article in Linux Journal from 2001. Anyone know why it isn't being used much (from what I can tell) and what's happening with it today? Thanks, Mike http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4468

...); // writing some values to the element // converting element into a matrix setAttrib(element, R_DimSymbol, imgSize); Thanks in advance for help Oleg Dr Oleg Sklyar European Bioinformatics Institute Wellcome Trust Genome Campus Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD England phone/fax +44(0)1223 49 4478/4468 e-mail osklyar@ebi.ac.uk

Hi! we have two Intel Quad Nic 82576, PCI ID 8086:10E8 and use the igb driver 1.3.19.3 on Debian 5.0.1. I used the pciback.hide XEN kernel parameter and made on of the NIC''s interfaces available in a DomU. Now, when I am starting the VM, the system crashes (log attached) I also tried to boot with the irqpoll option - the Interrupt Disabled message still appears when I try to start the

...end end end -------------- next part -------------- An embedded message was scrubbed... From: Walther H Diechmann <walt at alco.dk> Subject: does BackgrounDRB not "know" the rails environment it is running within/in parallel with? Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2008 01:21:45 +0200 Size: 4468 URL: <http://rubyforge.org/pipermail/backgroundrb-devel/attachments/20080615/141cea80/attachment.eml>

.... When I try to call the number I get a busy signal. If I perform a rmmod wcfxo and restart asterisk everything retruns to normal. I have a TDP400P installed along with the X100P. Any ideas what may be happening. Log Entries at time of Alarm Dec 25 21:42:13 WARNING[663568]: File chan_zap.c, Line 4468 (ss_thread): CallerID returned with error on channel 'Zap/1-1' Dec 25 21:42:31 WARNING[663568]: File chan_zap.c, Line 2779 (zt_handle_event): Detected alarm on channel 1: Red Alarm Dec 25 21:42:50 WARNING[8192]: File config.c, Line 579 (cfg_process): No '=' (equal sign) in line 34 o...

I have 2 * boxes. 1 has 2 PRI's from the Telco, and a PRI to the 2nd * The other has ZAP channels to Channelbanks for endusers. If someone on the second box calls a Toll Free number (it probably doesn't matter that it is toll free) that is auto answered by an auto attendant (QVC, a Bank, the Airlines, Credit Card Companies....) then the call gets dropped with in a couple of seconds of

...010-4472 (R) RHSA-2011:0282: Critical: java-1.6.0-sun security update 2/17/11 CVE-2010-4422 (R) CVE-2010-4447 (R) CVE-2010-4448 (R) CVE-2010-4450 CVE-2010-4451 (R) CVE-2010-4452 (R) CVE-2010-4454 (R) CVE-2010-4462 (R) CVE-2010-4463 (R) CVE-2010-4465 (R) CVE-2010-4466 (R) CVE-2010-4467 (R) CVE-2010-4468 (R) CVE-2010-4469 (R) CVE-2010-4470 (R) CVE-2010-4471 (R) CVE-2010-4472 (R) CVE-2010-4473 (R) CVE-2010-4475 (R) CVE-2010-4476 (R) I know the development team is furiously working to get 5.6 out the door so I understand that there will be delays. However, it was my understanding that "Critical...