Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "40xx".
Did you mean:
340xx
2007 Feb 14
2
Problem Transferring Direct to Voicemail
I am having an issue with 1.4 where we can't successfully transfer a
call directly to a voicemail box. We hit "Transfer" on the phone and
dial the mailbox number we want to send it to,
My dial plan for this is:
exten=>_*40XX,n,Voicemail(${EXTEN:1},u)
The voicemail system picks up and starts to play its message and at this
point. We should then hit "Transfer" again at this point the person
doing the transfer should drop off the call. However we just continue to
hear the voicemail message and the caller con...
2008 Mar 09
0
phones start ringing randomly with Grandstream GXW-40XX - solution!
Thought i would share this so it doesnt annoy others as much as it did me :)
If you recently installed a GXW 40XX and your extensions start ringing
magically now (ringing for no reason, pick it up its a clear tone) you
need to check the "Disable send MWI" in your gateway. apparently
certain old phones do not like the MWI signal and treat it like a ring
tone.
--
Faraz R Khan
Chief Architec...
2007 Feb 16
5
FW: Problem Transferring Direct to Voicemail
Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
--Bandwidth and Colocation provided by Easynews.com --
asterisk-users mailing list
To UNSUBSCRIBE or update options visit:
http://lists.digium.com/mailman/listinfo/asterisk-users
2007 Feb 12
1
FW: After upgrade to 1.4 transfers don't workproperly
.... Now here is another situation. When we try to transfer a call directly to voicemail it plays the voicemail message but we can't transfer the call. The only way I could get it to work was to do a conference and then drop out of that conference.
My dial plan for direct dialing is:
exten=>_*40XX,n,Voicemail(${EXTEN:1},u)
When this is attempted the following message shows up on the CLI of Asterisk:
[Feb 9 11:52:03] WARNING[5054]: chan_sip.c:12310 handle_response: Notify answer on an owned channel?
Can anyone tell me what this means and what I can do to fix this?
Thanks
-----Original M...
2007 Feb 08
1
After upgrade to 1.4 transfers don't workproperly
This worked. Great and thanks
-----Original Message-----
From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Carlos Chavez
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:52 PM
To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion
Subject: Re: [asterisk-users] After upgrade to 1.4 transfers don't workproperly
On Wed, 2007-02-07 at 14:12
2004 Dec 10
2
Integrating * with Mitel SX2000 Lite
Hi All,
Our experience with * to date has been a bit limited. It's a 4xCisco
7960 network, linking our head office with a faraday caged datacenter.
As a way of putting voicecomms into a sealed room, it was quick and easy
to deploy, and works very well. As typically happens, we've now thought
about extending the use of asterisk - and a new opportunity has cropped
up. In three months
2007 Mar 28
7
wireless desktop phones
I am looking for completly wireless desktop phones. Until I realized we
needed wireless i was going to use polycom soundpoint 501's. Any
suggestions on a comparable wireless phone?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20070328/88e22671/attachment.htm
2004 Apr 05
4
Q: Controlling access at the Ethernet level
Hi Adrian,
Sunday, April 4, 2004, 10:22:33 PM, you wrote:
AP> We have thought about using static MAC entries per port on managed
AP> switches installed at the client endpoints, but that would require a
AP> overwhelming budget. We are also thinking about L2TP and PPPoE, but I
AP> am uncertain about compatibility.
AP> What would you recommand ? Are there any other elegant