search for: 4.21

Hello Folks, I've just seen that these commands will be removed in 4.21: net ads keytab add <principal> net ads keytab delete <principal> net ads keytab add_update_ads What are the alternate tools that can be used to modify the keytab? Will SPN manipulations continue to work? Here's what I use: net ads keytab add_update_ads nfs/$(hostname -f) -U Administrator Thank You!

The following changes since commit 37d1246af2d530710cf5822d2845774f01c03b22: virtio_net: bulk free tx skbs (2018-12-06 14:28:39 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-ccw-20181219 for you to fetch changes up to 6fb95ef30707f1b2fcaea8d6dc873055e0460b1a: virtio-ccw: diag 500 may return a negative cookie

The following changes since commit 37d1246af2d530710cf5822d2845774f01c03b22: virtio_net: bulk free tx skbs (2018-12-06 14:28:39 -0500) are available in the Git repository at: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-ccw-20181219 for you to fetch changes up to 6fb95ef30707f1b2fcaea8d6dc873055e0460b1a: virtio-ccw: diag 500 may return a negative cookie

On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 09:55:07AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:14:13 +0100 > Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > > > The following changes since commit 37d1246af2d530710cf5822d2845774f01c03b22: > > > > virtio_net: bulk free tx skbs (2018-12-06 14:28:39 -0500) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: >

On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 09:55:07AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:14:13 +0100 > Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > > > The following changes since commit 37d1246af2d530710cf5822d2845774f01c03b22: > > > > virtio_net: bulk free tx skbs (2018-12-06 14:28:39 -0500) > > > > are available in the Git repository at: >

I'm trying to build 4.21-rc packages for debian, and noticed that a new form of version info symbol appeared (only tried tdb for now). In addition to usual TDB.1.4.11 at TDB.1_4.11 symbol, it now also adds TDB_1_4_11 at TDB_1_4_11 (with dots replaced with underscores), but for single version only. It doesn't look right :) Thanks, /mjt -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to

On 30/07/24 9:00 pm, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > I'm trying to build 4.21-rc packages for debian, and noticed > that a new form of version info symbol appeared (only tried > tdb for now).? In addition to usual > > ?TDB.1.4.11 at TDB.1_4.11 > > symbol, it now also adds > > ?TDB_1_4_11 at TDB_1_4_11 > > (with dots replaced with underscores), but for

On 31/07/24 17:07, Jo Sutton wrote: > On 30/07/24 9:00 pm, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> I'm trying to build 4.21-rc packages for debian, and noticed >> that a new form of version info symbol appeared (only tried >> tdb for now).? In addition to usual >> >> ??TDB.1.4.11 at TDB.1_4.11 >> >> symbol, it now also adds >> >>

On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:14:13 +0100 Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > The following changes since commit 37d1246af2d530710cf5822d2845774f01c03b22: > > virtio_net: bulk free tx skbs (2018-12-06 14:28:39 -0500) > > are available in the Git repository at: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvms390/linux.git tags/virtio-ccw-20181219 >

On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 11:50:22AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Thu, Jan 03, 2019 at 09:55:07AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 19 Dec 2018 11:14:13 +0100 > > Cornelia Huck <cohuck at redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > The following changes since commit 37d1246af2d530710cf5822d2845774f01c03b22: > > > > > > virtio_net: bulk free

Are Samba developers aware that the only way to create usable GPOs (which are arguably one of the most important features of an AD environment) is to use a Samba version (4.19.x) that is two versions behind the current one and that, according to "Samba Release Planning and Supported Release Lifetime", is scheduled for discontinuation in March 2025?

Hi Samba team, In the release notes of 4.21 a new setting "sync machine password script" is mentioned and? it says "Check in smb.conf(5)", so that is what I am trying to do... When I browse to https://www.samba.org/samba/docs/current/man-html/smb.conf.5.html, it turns out that above parameter is not mentioned on this page. My guess is that something is broken in the

When building libldb as public library, its install target does not install ldb_version.h header file, which is included from ldb.h, so the resulting header files are unusable. Thanks, /mjt -- GPG Key transition (from rsa2048 to rsa4096) since 2024-04-24. New key: rsa4096/61AD3D98ECDF2C8E 9D8B E14E 3F2A 9DD7 9199 28F1 61AD 3D98 ECDF 2C8E Old key: rsa2048/457CE0A0804465C5 6EE1 95D1 886E 8FFB

On 30/07/24 22:20, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > When building libldb as public library, its install target does not > install ldb_version.h header file, which is included from ldb.h, so > the resulting header files are unusable. It may be that 625fb48326ec62a33ce0abdbfb0f6f3d33d7cc64 accidentally reversed the logic:

31.07.2024 08:30, Douglas Bagnall via samba ?????: > On 30/07/24 22:20, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: >> When building libldb as public library, its install target does not >> install ldb_version.h header file, which is included from ldb.h, so >> the resulting header files are unusable. > > It may be that 625fb48326ec62a33ce0abdbfb0f6f3d33d7cc64 accidentally reversed

On Sat, 2024-08-03 at 21:33 +0300, Michael Tokarev wrote: > 31.07.2024 08:30, Douglas Bagnall via samba ?????: > > On 30/07/24 22:20, Michael Tokarev via samba wrote: > > > When building libldb as public library, its install target does not > > > install ldb_version.h header file, which is included from ldb.h, so > > > the resulting header files are unusable.

On 26.10.2024 16:37, Ingo Asche via samba wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for your effort from me, too... Thank you for the support as well, it makes me feel excellent :) > By the way, have you planned to get the Bookworm backports up to 4.21.x? Yes, it is waiting for current 4.21.1+dfsg-2 to migrate to testing (with the fixes mentioned in this thread), and I'll push it to

Hi! I'm seeing quite a lot of messages like this one: [2024/06/07 06:52:47.259003, 1]\ source3/rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:550(cli_pipe_validate_current_pdu) source3/rpc_client/cli_pipe.c:550: \ RPC fault code DCERPC_NCA_S_OP_RNG_ERROR received from host tsrv! in log.wb-TSRV file on a regular domain member server acting as a file server. This happens with at least samba versions 4.21

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.21.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.21 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Hardening of "valid

Release Announcements ===================== This is the first release candidate of Samba 4.21.? This is *not* intended for production environments and is designed for testing purposes only.? Please report any defects via the Samba bug reporting system at https://bugzilla.samba.org/. Samba 4.21 will be the next version of the Samba suite. UPGRADING ========= Hardening of "valid