search for: 4.16

On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 20:28:18 +0300 Michael Tokarev via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > 22.02.2024 16:39, Arnaud FLORENT via samba: > >>> http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/focal/ > >> > >> Oh.? I did a cleanup of the files in there, and, among various > >> duplicates, also removed 4.16.? Maybe it was too soon :) > >> >

HI, I''m having trouble with a debian etch HVM domU inside a dom0 domu >From domU, I try to ping gateway, but response time change if tcpdump is writing to standard output. Ping without tcpdump running has a 4 ms time. While tcpdump is writing in stdout, in another terminal: # ping -n -c20 10.12.6.1 PING 10.12.6.1 (10.12.6.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 10.12.6.1: icmp_seq=1

Hi we are using Michael repo on ubuntu focal 20.04 for 4.16 samba branch Thank Michael for sharing theses packages it looks that 4.16 branch is missing since 17/2 will this repository be restored or should we move to samba 4.17? http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba/focal/

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Meelis Roos <mroos at linux.ee> wrote: >> This is 4.16-rc1+todays git on a lowly P4 with NV5, worked fine in 4.15: > > NV5 in another PC (secondary card in x86-64) made the systrem crash on > boot, in nvkm_therm_clkgate_fini. Mind booting with nouveau.debug=trace? That should hopefully tell us more exactly which thing is dying. If you have a

Hi! After providing samba builds for several debian and ubuntu releases for over 1.5 years, I see this service is quite popular still. However, I'd love to understand how useful it is still, and which releases should be provided in the future. For example, samba 4.16.x series is end-of-life, there has been no updates for it for quite some time and none planned, either. Yet people do have

> This is 4.16-rc1+todays git on a lowly P4 with NV5, worked fine in 4.15: NV5 in another PC (secondary card in x86-64) made the systrem crash on boot, in nvkm_therm_clkgate_fini. -- Meelis Roos (mroos at linux.ee)

On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Meelis Roos <mroos at linux.ee> wrote: >>> This is 4.16-rc1+todays git on a lowly P4 with NV5, worked fine in 4.15: >> >> NV5 in another PC (secondary card in x86-64) made the systrem crash on >> boot, in nvkm_therm_clkgate_fini. > > Mind

Actually this was brought up to me already, there's a fix on the mailing list for this I reviewed a little while ago from nvidia that we should pull in: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/203205/ Would you guys mind confirming that this patch fixes your issues? On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 18:41 +0100, Pierre Moreau wrote: > On 2018-02-14 — 09:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb

Damien-- Attached is a patch to contrib/redhat/sshd.init which eliminates the dependency on the success() and failure() functions from initscripts>=4.16. This allows sshd.init to be used for both early and recent releases of Red Hat Linux (i've confirmed it works on both 4.2 and 5.2 as well as 6.2). The patch also removes the 'Requires: initscripts >= 4.16' line from

On 2018-02-14 — 09:36, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:35 AM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:29 AM, Meelis Roos <mroos at linux.ee> wrote: > >>> This is 4.16-rc1+todays git on a lowly P4 with NV5, worked fine in 4.15: > >> > >> NV5 in another PC (secondary card in x86-64) made the systrem

Hello everyone! I have a data frame of 136 variables with 270 observations. I would like to create a new data frame such that each element of that data frame contains the maximum value of the 6 prior lags of the initial data frame. So for example, if my original data frame, A, were A1=c(7.72, 7.94, 7.56, 7.54, 0.93, 0.59, 7.21, 8.00, 7.19, 7.57)A2=c(4.27, 3.70, 3.80, 3.67, 3.83, 3.95, 4.02, 2.06,

This is 4.16-rc1+todays git ona lowly P4 with NV5, worked fine in 4.15: [ 7.361155] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: NVIDIA NV05 (20154000) [ 7.386601] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: bios: version 02.05.19.03.00 [ 7.386715] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: bios: DCB table not found [ 7.386983] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: bios: DCB table not found [ 7.387166] nouveau 0000:01:00.0: bios: DCB table not found [

I am running *Samba 4.16.11_5* on F*reeBSD 14.1-RELEASE*. This is my Samba config file: [global] ??? workgroup = WORKGROUP ??? server string = SafeNAS ??? log file = /var/log/samba.log ??? max log size = 10240 ??? bind interfaces only = true ??? interfaces = 172.16.50.4 172.16.51.4 172.16.52.4 ??? disable netbios = yes ??? directory name cache size = 0 ??? aio write size = 0 ??? load

Hi! We faced another issue with not having samba (ad-dc) users in local /etc/password: this way, we can't easily have services run as users this way, since winbindd is started later than most services are (and it requires working network). Also, user-defined cron @reboot jobs aren't being run, for the same reason: cron is stared before winbindd on most systems. This is quite difficult to

Hello i am running samba 4.16 as AD-DC controller on Ubuntu 20.04 using www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba focal/samba-4.16 repository everything is running fine but i have few log files in /var/log/samba/ are not handl by /etc/logrotate.d/samba log.samba-dcerpcd log.rpcd_classic log.rpcd_winreg log.samba-bgqd log.rpcd_spoolss i guess those files size will not grow more than max log

On 20/05/2023 10:29, Andrea Venturoli via samba wrote: > Hello. > > At a site I've got a domain with only one DC, which is Windows 2012. > This OS will be soon out of support and must be replaced. > The replacement will be Windows 2022 standard, but, for reason I won't > dwell into, it shulud not be a DC. > > Is it possibile to migrate this domain to a Samba DC,

On 5/20/23 12:47, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >> Is it possibile to migrate this domain to a Samba DC, then join the >> new server as a member? > > Yes, that should be possible. Thanks. >> Will Samba 4.16 do? > > As always, a later version would be better, but 4.16.x should suffice. That's what we have on FreeBSD now. Of course later versions will

On 20/07/2023 09:37, Hans Schulze via samba wrote: > I found an old bugzilla report for this behavior: > > https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9612 > > According to the statements in it, there was a patch already in version > 4.16 and in heimdal 8 last year? Which option must be in the krb5.conf? Sorry, but I read it slightly differently, there was a patch available,

On 28/03/2023 08:40, Arnaud FLORENT via samba wrote: > Hello > > > i am running samba 4.16 as AD-DC controller on Ubuntu 20.04 using > www.corpit.ru/mjt/packages/samba focal/samba-4.16 repository > > > everything is running fine but i have few log files in /var/log/samba/ > are not handl by /etc/logrotate.d/samba > > log.samba-dcerpcd > >

The Wine development release 4.16 is now available. What's new in this release (see below for details): - More reliable mouse grabbing in games. - Better cross-compilation support in WineGCC. - Improved compatibility with Windows debuggers. - Various bug fixes. The source is available from the following locations: https://dl.winehq.org/wine/source/4.x/wine-4.16.tar.xz