search for: 310

Thanks every one first. I have a dataset like this Year Month Day Hour DIR SPD (m/s) SKYCOVER TEMP (C) RH(%) 2009 1 1 0 310 13.85824 3 -5 23 2009 1 1 1 330 14.30528 3 -7.222222222 26 2009 1 1 2 320 10.72896 3 -7.222222222 24 2009 1 1 3 320 10.72896 3 -6.666666667 23 2009 1 1 4 320 10.28192 3 -7.222222222 26 2009 1 1 5 330 10.28192 3 -7.222222222 26 2009 1 1 6 330 10.28192 3 -7.222222222 25 2009 1 1 6 320 12.96416 3 -7.2...

...intervalue)) ifelse(unitless.interval>=5, hour.interval<-(unitless.interval/60), hour.interval<-unitless.interval) hours<-0 for (i in 1:(fileno-1)){hours<-c(hours,(i*hour.interval))} myfileinfo <- size isdir mode mtime ctime G2659310 2006-307-21-09-57.txt 10220 FALSE 666 2006-11-03 21:04:00 2006-11-13 10:56:39 G2659310 2006-307-21-45-55.txt 10230 FALSE 666 2006-11-03 21:40:00 2006-11-13 10:56:39 G2659310 2006-307-22-23-00.txt 10236 FALSE 666 2006-11-03 22:17:00 2006-11-13 10:56:39 G2659310 2006-307-23-00-33.txt 10236 FALSE...

...bol table info available. #3 0x00007f1e01e8f16f in custom_prepare (obj=0x1e588c8, data=0x7f1dc8a289b0) at res_config_odbc.c:107 res = 0 x = 1 count = 0 cps = 0x7f1dc8a289b0 field = 0x1e588a8 encodebuf = "\001\200\255\373\000\000\000\001P\205\242\310\035\177\000\000P\205\242\310\035\177\000\000P\205\242\310\035\177\000\000P\205\242\310\035\177\000\000\206\205\242\310\035\177\000\000\237\205\242\310\035\177\000\000P\205\242\310\035\177\000\000\237\205\242\310\035\177\000\000\342X\350\002\036\177\000\000\247p\350\001\000\000\000\000\351?:\036\177...

...6, Tim Calkins <tcalkins@gmail.com> wrote: > hardly the most efficient way to go, but consider using a substring > function to extract the time bits from your data, then reading them as POSIX > dates and using difftime. > > for example, > > > mytime <- c("G2659310 2006-310-10-55-32.txt 10134 FALSE 666 2006-11-06 > 10:49:00 2006-11-13 10:56:41", > "G2659310 2006-310-11-31-43.txt 10136 FALSE 666 2006-11-06 11:25:00 > 2006-11-13 10:56:41", > "G2659310 2006-310-12-08-04.txt 10140 FALSE 666 2006-11-06 12:02:00 > 2006-11-13 10...

...user is: [DOMAIN1]\[projcontrol.sect.head]@[NB110] [2011/11/10 14:05:36, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) push_sec_ctx(99, 99) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2011/11/10 14:05:36, 3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx) push_conn_ctx(100) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2011/11/10 14:05:36, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2011/11/10 14:05:36, 2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:571(init_sam_from_ldap) init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: projcontrol.sect.head [2011/11/10 14:05:36, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2...

...#39;m running Samba 3.4.7 here as PDC. When I login with a new account called "guest2", the computer says the password of my login is incorrect. What is my problem? What should I check? Koala Yeung P.S. Here is the error log of my domain logon: [2010/05/08 17:56:36, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) > setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 > [2010/05/08 17:56:45, 3] smbd/process.c:1459(process_smb) > Transaction 26 of length 45 (0 toread) > [2010/05/08 17:56:45, 3] smbd/process.c:1273(switch_message) > switch message SMBclose (pid 3536) conn 0xb91e35...

...word: ?mapped user is: [PHPDEVSRV]\[reebu]@[FINGENTPC12] [2010/03/23 05:23:26, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2010/03/23 05:23:26, ?3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx) ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/03/23 05:23:26, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2010/03/23 05:23:26, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2 [2010/03/23 05:23:26, ?3] smbd/uid.c:428(push_conn_ctx) ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2010/03/23 05:23:26, ?3] smbd/sec_c...

Just FYI: IP address 89.248.168.176 has been trying to use the recently release SIP vulnerability in Asterisk to make outbound calls via our box. They are running a bank account callback scam. Jeremy Mann Director of IT Texas Health Management Group Direct Line: 817-310-4956 Main Line: 817-310-4999 Helpdesk: 817-310-4999 x3 Fax: 817-310-4990 Email: jmann at txhmg.com ________________________________ This e-mail, facsimile, or letter and any files or attachments transmitted with it contains information that is confidential and privileged. This information is inte...

...nfig config.status: creating config.h rsync 2.6.9 configuration successful ~/src/rsync-2.6.9$ make /opt/intel/compilo_9/l_cc_c_9.1.042/bin/icc -c99 -I. -I. -g -O2 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W -c rsync.c -o rsync.o icc: Command line remark: option '-W' not supported proto.h(224): remark #310: old-style parameter list (anachronism) void setup_iconv(); ^ rsync.c(33): remark #1419: external declaration in primary source file extern int verbose; ^ rsync.c(34): remark #1419: external declaration in primary source file extern int dry_run; ^ rsync.c(3...

...inux kernel oplocks enabled [2011/03/14 08:59:43.274170, 3] smbd/process.c:1489(process_smb) Transaction 0 of length 137 (0 toread) [2011/03/14 08:59:43.274284, 3] smbd/process.c:1298(switch_message) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 2606) conn 0x0 [2011/03/14 08:59:43.274371, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2011/03/14 08:59:43.275195, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [2011/03/14 08:59:43.275283, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] [2011/03/14 08:59:43.275...

...: [SLCLINUXFS001]\[]@[HICMBSA001] [2010/06/23 12:47:38.011642, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2010/06/23 12:47:38.011670, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/06/23 12:47:38.011709, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2010/06/23 12:47:38.011812, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/06/23 12:47:38.011921, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2010/06/23 12:4...

...tputs this at log level 3 [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724539, 3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb) Transaction 0 of length 137 (0 toread) [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724570, 3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message) switch message SMBnegprot (pid 1986) conn 0x0 [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724593, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724661, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0] [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724679, 3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot) Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0] [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724...

...A controller? Can anyone explain this. I was running strace -- here is a small sample: rocess 12270 attached - interrupt to quit select(32, [5 21 31], [], NULL, {59, 890000}) = 1 (in [5], left {59, 330000}) read(5, "\0\0\0H", 4) = 4 read(5, "\377SMB2\0\0\0\0\30\7\310\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\4\0,"..., 72) = 72 fstat64(34, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0744, st_size=65112414, ...}) = 0 fcntl64(13, F_SETLKW64, {type=F_RDLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=24480, len=1}, 0xbff627c4) = 0 fcntl64(13, F_SETLKW64, {type=F_UNLCK, whence=SEEK_SET, start=24480, len=1}, 0xbff627e4) = 0 wr...

..., I am trying to find the min of day for each student in each year. Here is the dataset: date studentid year 1/1/05 6:07 AM 236 20082009 3/27/09 9:45 AM 236 20082009 4/29/09 8:44 AM 236 20082009 3/27/09 11:36 AM 310 20082009 4/1/09 10:43 AM 310 20082009 10/15/09 8:54 AM 310 20092010 10/22/09 8:54 AM 310 20092010 10/28/09 8:06 AM 310 20092010 11/19/09 9:06 AM 310 20092010 10/24/07 9:22 AM 335 20072008 12/13/07 9:26 AM 335 20072008 2/25/09 1:49 PM 335...

...guest ok = Yes [IPC$] hosts allow = 192.168.1.0/24, 127.0.0.0/8 available = No log.cab-312-test1 (windows 7 machine): [2010/10/06 14:52:15.293125, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/10/06 14:52:15.293145, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2010/10/06 14:52:15.293177, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx) pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/10/06 14:52:15.293213, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 10001) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2010/10/...

We have a Linux file server for a set of computer science and engineering labs where each lab contains machines running Mac OS X, Ubuntu Linux, or some incarnation of Windows. At times the these machines become almost unusable and I think I have narrowed the problem to smbd processes soaking up all the CPU on the server. Running 'top' on the server reveals a dozen or so entries like

Does anyone know why? ThePBX*CLI> -- Executing [310-456-7890 at from-trunk:1] Set("SIP/202.101.202.101-b763ce60", "__FROM_DID=310-456-7890") in new stack -- Executing [310-456-7890 at from-trunk:2] ExecIf("SIP/202.101.202.101-b763ce60", "1 |Set|CALLERID(name)=310-456-0987") in new stack -- Executing [310-45...

Dear all, I have a result my experiment like this below (here my toy example): foo1 <- list() foo1[[1]] <- c(10, 20, 30) foo1[[2]] <- c(11, 21, 31) foo2 <- list() foo2[[1]] <- c(100, 200, 300) foo2[[2]] <- c(110, 210, 310) foo3 <- list() foo3[[1]] <- c(1000, 2000, 3000) foo3[[2]] <- c(1100, 2100, 3100) list(foo1,foo2,foo3) The result: > list(foo1,foo2,foo3) [[1]] [[1]][[1]] [1] 10 20 30 [[1]][[2]] [1] 11 21 31 [[2]] [[2]][[1]] [1] 100 200 300 [[2]][[2]] [1] 110 210 310 [[3]] [[3]][[1]] [1] 1000 20...

...user is: [TUX]\[testuser]@[TUX] [2012/06/23 14:07:02.437849, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2012/06/23 14:07:02.437858, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx) push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 [2012/06/23 14:07:02.437865, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 [2012/06/23 14:07:02.437895, 4] lib/substitute.c:504(automount_server) Home server: tux [2012/06/23 14:07:02.437907, 4] lib/substitute.c:504(automount_server) Home server: tux ... [2012/06/23 14:07:02.438168, 4] lib/substitute....

...:38.011642, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) >>> push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 >>> [2010/06/23 12:47:38.011670, 3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx) >>> push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 >>> [2010/06/23 12:47:38.011709, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx) >>> setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1 >>> [2010/06/23 12:47:38.011812, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx) >>> pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0 >>> [2010/06/23 12:47:38.011921, 3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx) >>&...