thr3ads.net - samba - [Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain [Apr 2010]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Michael Leonetti

2010-Apr-30 00:10 UTC

[Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain

Using LDAP and the smbldap-tools.  When attempting to join the domain with an
administrative user, the computer gets added to the Computers list in LDAP with
the following attributes:
 

 cn:  workstation75$ 
 description:  Computer
 gecos:  Computer
 gidNumber:  515
 homeDirectory:  /dev/null
 loginShell:  /bin/false
 objectClass:  top, account, posixAccount
 uid:  workstation75$
 uidNumber:  1068

Then the workstation displays this message:

"the following error occurred attempting to join the domain
"falm"
 
the user name could not be found"
 
Then the workstation log outputs this at log level 3
 
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724539,  3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
  Transaction 0 of length 137 (0 toread)
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724570,  3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
  switch message SMBnegprot (pid 1986) conn 0x0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724593,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724661,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
  Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724679,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
  Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724692,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
  Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724706,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
  Requested protocol [LM1.2X002]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724724,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
  Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724742,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
  Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724846,  3] smbd/negprot.c:404(reply_nt1)
  using SPNEGO
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724862,  3] smbd/negprot.c:691(reply_negprot)
  Selected protocol NT LM 0.12
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736749,  3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
  Transaction 1 of length 240 (0 toread)
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736799,  3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
  switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1986) conn 0x0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736880,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736930,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1435(reply_sesssetup_and_X)
  wct=12 flg2=0xc807
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736952,  2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1390(setup_new_vc_session)
  setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old
resources.
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.737021,  3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1189(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
  Doing spnego session setup
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.737086,  3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1231(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
  NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1]
PrimaryDomain=[]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.737157,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:805(reply_spnego_negotiate)
  reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 40
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.737254,  3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:65(debug_ntlmssp_flags)
  Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa2088207
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738057,  3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
  Transaction 2 of length 358 (0 toread)
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738121,  3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
  switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1986) conn 0x0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738185,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738244,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1435(reply_sesssetup_and_X)
  wct=12 flg2=0xc807
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738285,  2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1390(setup_new_vc_session)
  setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all old
resources.
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738337,  3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1189(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
  Doing spnego session setup
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738396,  3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1231(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
  NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002 5.1]
PrimaryDomain=[]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738471,  3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:747(ntlmssp_server_auth)
  Got user=[administrator] domain=[falm] workstation=[WORKSTATION75] len1=24
len2=24
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738557,  3] auth/auth.c:216(check_ntlm_password)
  check_ntlm_password:  Checking password for unmapped user
[falm]\[administrator]@[WORKSTATION75] with the new password interface
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738622,  3] auth/auth.c:219(check_ntlm_password)
  check_ntlm_password:  mapped user is: [falm]\[administrator]@[WORKSTATION75]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738687,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738728,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738771,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738960,  2] lib/smbldap.c:950(smbldap_open_connection)
  smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.739601,  3] lib/smbldap.c:1166(smbldap_connect_system)
  ldap_connect_system: successful connection to the LDAP server
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740038,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:572(init_sam_from_ldap)
  init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: administrator
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740168,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740211,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740252,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740344,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740469,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740508,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740548,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740809,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.741718,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.741765,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.741803,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742113,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446(init_group_from_ldap)
  init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 500
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742196,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742255,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742299,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742347,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742393,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742434,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742480,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743163,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446(init_group_from_ldap)
  init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 500
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743221,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743269,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743309,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743347,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743395,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743444,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743512,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743550,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743590,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743649,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743708,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743830,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743868,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743907,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743968,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
  pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.744004,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.744044,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.744079,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.746497,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
  push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.746517,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
  push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.746538,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
  setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.747055,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446(init_group_from_ldap)
  init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 512
 
The problem is the log doesn't give me any information on what's going
on and this happened out of nowhere.  Any help would really be appreciated.

Zoolook

2010-Apr-30 00:30 UTC

head link

[Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain

2010/4/29 Michael Leonetti <mleonetti at evolutionce.com>:
> The problem is the log doesn't give me any information on what's
going on and this happened out of nowhere. ?Any help would really be
appreciated.
>
and your smb.conf?

Most of the time, add machine script has '%u' (or "%u"),
remove the
quotes (or add them; depends on versions, and if a butterfly is flying
somewhere in Japan) and it will work.

HTH,
Norberto

Michael Leonetti

2010-Apr-30 01:34 UTC

head link

[Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain

Using LDAP and the smbldap-tools.  When attempting to join the domain  
with an administrative user, the computer gets added to the Computers  
list in LDAP with the following attributes:

  cn:  workstation75$
  description:  Computer
  gecos:  Computer
  gidNumber:  515
  homeDirectory:  /dev/null
  loginShell:  /bin/false
  objectClass:  top, account, posixAccount
  uid:  workstation75$
  uidNumber:  1068

Then the workstation displays this message:

"the following error occurred attempting to join the domain
"falm"

the user name could not be found"

Then the workstation log outputs this at log level 3

[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724539,  3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
   Transaction 0 of length 137 (0 toread)
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724570,  3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
   switch message SMBnegprot (pid 1986) conn 0x0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724593,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724661,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
   Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724679,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
   Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724692,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
   Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724706,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
   Requested protocol [LM1.2X002]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724724,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
   Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724742,  3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
   Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724846,  3] smbd/negprot.c:404(reply_nt1)
   using SPNEGO
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.724862,  3] smbd/negprot.c:691(reply_negprot)
   Selected protocol NT LM 0.12
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736749,  3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
   Transaction 1 of length 240 (0 toread)
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736799,  3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
   switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1986) conn 0x0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736880,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736930,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1435 
(reply_sesssetup_and_X)
   wct=12 flg2=0xc807
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.736952,  2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1390 
(setup_new_vc_session)
   setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would  
close all old resources.
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.737021,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1189 
(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
   Doing spnego session setup
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.737086,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1231 
(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
   NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows  
2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.737157,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:805 
(reply_spnego_negotiate)
   reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 40
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.737254,  3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:65 
(debug_ntlmssp_flags)
   Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa2088207
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738057,  3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
   Transaction 2 of length 358 (0 toread)
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738121,  3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
   switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1986) conn 0x0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738185,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738244,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1435 
(reply_sesssetup_and_X)
   wct=12 flg2=0xc807
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738285,  2] smbd/sesssetup.c:1390 
(setup_new_vc_session)
   setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would  
close all old resources.
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738337,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1189 
(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
   Doing spnego session setup
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738396,  3] smbd/sesssetup.c:1231 
(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
   NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows  
2002 5.1] PrimaryDomain=[]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738471,  3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:747 
(ntlmssp_server_auth)
   Got user=[administrator] domain=[falm] workstation=[WORKSTATION75]  
len1=24 len2=24
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738557,  3] auth/auth.c:216(check_ntlm_password)
   check_ntlm_password:  Checking password for unmapped user [falm]\ 
[administrator]@[WORKSTATION75] with the new password interface
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738622,  3] auth/auth.c:219(check_ntlm_password)
   check_ntlm_password:  mapped user is: [falm]\[administrator]@ 
[WORKSTATION75]
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738687,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738728,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738771,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.738960,  2] lib/smbldap.c:950 
(smbldap_open_connection)
   smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.739601,  3] lib/smbldap.c:1166 
(smbldap_connect_system)
   ldap_connect_system: successful connection to the LDAP server
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740038,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:572 
(init_sam_from_ldap)
   init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: administrator
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740168,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740211,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740252,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740344,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
   pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740469,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740508,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740548,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.740809,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
   pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.741718,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.741765,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.741803,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742113,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446 
(init_group_from_ldap)
   init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 500
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742196,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
   pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742255,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742299,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742347,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742393,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742434,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.742480,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743163,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446 
(init_group_from_ldap)
   init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 500
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743221,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
   pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743269,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
   pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743309,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743347,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743395,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743444,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
   pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743512,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743550,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743590,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743649,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
   pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743708,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
   pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743830,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743868,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743907,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.743968,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
   pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.744004,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.744044,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.744079,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.746497,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
   push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.746517,  3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
   push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.746538,  3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
   setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
[2010/04/29 19:52:33.747055,  2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446 
(init_group_from_ldap)
   init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 512

The problem is the log doesn't give me any information on what's going  
on and this happened out of nowhere.  Any help would really be  
appreciated.

Damien Dye

2010-May-01 17:09 UTC

head link

[Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain

humm

cn:  workstation75$
 description:  Computer
 gecos:  Computer
 gidNumber:  515
 homeDirectory:  /dev/null
 loginShell:  /bin/false
 objectClass:  top, account, posixAccount
 uid:  workstation75$
 uidNumber:  1068

looks like the samba account has not been created only the unix account.

does the join work if you have a samba account for the machine defined first ?


--
Damien Dye BSC(hon)




On 30 April 2010 01:10, Michael Leonetti <mleonetti at evolutionce.com>
wrote:> Using LDAP and the smbldap-tools. ?When attempting to join the domain with
an administrative user, the computer gets added to the Computers list in LDAP
with the following attributes:
>
>
> ?cn: ?workstation75$
> ?description: ?Computer
> ?gecos: ?Computer
> ?gidNumber: ?515
> ?homeDirectory: ?/dev/null
> ?loginShell: ?/bin/false
> ?objectClass: ?top, account, posixAccount
> ?uid: ?workstation75$
> ?uidNumber: ?1068
>
> Then the workstation displays this message:
>
> "the following error occurred attempting to join the domain
"falm"
>
> the user name could not be found"
>
> Then the workstation log outputs this at log level 3
>
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724539, ?3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
> ?Transaction 0 of length 137 (0 toread)
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724570, ?3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
> ?switch message SMBnegprot (pid 1986) conn 0x0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724593, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724661, ?3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> ?Requested protocol [PC NETWORK PROGRAM 1.0]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724679, ?3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> ?Requested protocol [LANMAN1.0]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724692, ?3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> ?Requested protocol [Windows for Workgroups 3.1a]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724706, ?3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> ?Requested protocol [LM1.2X002]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724724, ?3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> ?Requested protocol [LANMAN2.1]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724742, ?3] smbd/negprot.c:586(reply_negprot)
> ?Requested protocol [NT LM 0.12]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724846, ?3] smbd/negprot.c:404(reply_nt1)
> ?using SPNEGO
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.724862, ?3] smbd/negprot.c:691(reply_negprot)
> ?Selected protocol NT LM 0.12
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736749, ?3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
> ?Transaction 1 of length 240 (0 toread)
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736799, ?3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
> ?switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1986) conn 0x0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736880, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736930, ?3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1435(reply_sesssetup_and_X)
> ?wct=12 flg2=0xc807
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.736952, ?2]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1390(setup_new_vc_session)
> ?setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all
old resources.
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.737021, ?3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1189(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
> ?Doing spnego session setup
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.737086, ?3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1231(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
> ?NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002
5.1] PrimaryDomain=[]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.737157, ?3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:805(reply_spnego_negotiate)
> ?reply_spnego_negotiate: Got secblob of size 40
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.737254, ?3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:65(debug_ntlmssp_flags)
> ?Got NTLMSSP neg_flags=0xa2088207
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738057, ?3] smbd/process.c:1485(process_smb)
> ?Transaction 2 of length 358 (0 toread)
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738121, ?3] smbd/process.c:1294(switch_message)
> ?switch message SMBsesssetupX (pid 1986) conn 0x0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738185, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738244, ?3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1435(reply_sesssetup_and_X)
> ?wct=12 flg2=0xc807
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738285, ?2]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1390(setup_new_vc_session)
> ?setup_new_vc_session: New VC == 0, if NT4.x compatible we would close all
old resources.
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738337, ?3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1189(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
> ?Doing spnego session setup
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738396, ?3]
smbd/sesssetup.c:1231(reply_sesssetup_and_X_spnego)
> ?NativeOS=[Windows 2002 Service Pack 3 2600] NativeLanMan=[Windows 2002
5.1] PrimaryDomain=[]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738471, ?3] libsmb/ntlmssp.c:747(ntlmssp_server_auth)
> ?Got user=[administrator] domain=[falm] workstation=[WORKSTATION75] len1=24
len2=24
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738557, ?3] auth/auth.c:216(check_ntlm_password)
> ?check_ntlm_password: ?Checking password for unmapped user
[falm]\[administrator]@[WORKSTATION75] with the new password interface
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738622, ?3] auth/auth.c:219(check_ntlm_password)
> ?check_ntlm_password: ?mapped user is:
[falm]\[administrator]@[WORKSTATION75]
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738687, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738728, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738771, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.738960, ?2] lib/smbldap.c:950(smbldap_open_connection)
> ?smbldap_open_connection: connection opened
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.739601, ?3] lib/smbldap.c:1166(smbldap_connect_system)
> ?ldap_connect_system: successful connection to the LDAP server
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740038, ?2] passdb/pdb_ldap.c:572(init_sam_from_ldap)
> ?init_sam_from_ldap: Entry found for user: administrator
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740168, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740211, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740252, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740344, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> ?pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740469, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740508, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740548, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.740809, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> ?pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.741718, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.741765, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.741803, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742113, ?2]
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446(init_group_from_ldap)
> ?init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 500
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742196, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> ?pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742255, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742299, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742347, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742393, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742434, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.742480, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 3
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743163, ?2]
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446(init_group_from_ldap)
> ?init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 500
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743221, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> ?pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743269, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> ?pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743309, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743347, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743395, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743444, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> ?pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743512, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743550, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743590, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743649, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> ?pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743708, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> ?pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743830, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743868, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743907, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.743968, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:418(pop_sec_ctx)
> ?pop_sec_ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.744004, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.744044, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 0
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.744079, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.746497, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:210(push_sec_ctx)
> ?push_sec_ctx(0, 0) : sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.746517, ?3] smbd/uid.c:429(push_conn_ctx)
> ?push_conn_ctx(0) : conn_ctx_stack_ndx = 1
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.746538, ?3] smbd/sec_ctx.c:310(set_sec_ctx)
> ?setting sec ctx (0, 0) - sec_ctx_stack_ndx = 2
> [2010/04/29 19:52:33.747055, ?2]
passdb/pdb_ldap.c:2446(init_group_from_ldap)
> ?init_group_from_ldap: Entry found for group: 512
>
> The problem is the log doesn't give me any information on what's
going on and this happened out of nowhere. ?Any help would really be
appreciated.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
> instructions: ?https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
>

Maybe Matching Threads

Search for more maybe matching threads

samba - Apr 2010 - The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain

[Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain

[Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain

[Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain

[Samba] The user name could not be found when joining a samba domain

Maybe Matching Threads