search for: 29.65

Hi [macOSX 10.4.6; R-2.3.0] I have encountered a difference in behaviour between R-2.2.1 and R-2.3.0 when performing a linear model. Transcript follows for R-2.3.0 (R-2.2.1 worked as expected). How to make R-2.3.0 perform as R-2.2.1 did? > dput(x) c(29.13, 29.88, 30.09, 29.99, 29.74, 29.64, 29.65, 29.7, 30.04, 29.89, 29.96, 29.65, 28.76, 28.41, 28.38, 29.55, 29.76, 29.75, 29.84,

Hi, Using package gclus in R, I have created some graphs that show the trends within subgroups of data and correlations among 9 variables (v1-v9). Being interested for more details on these data I have produced also the var-covar matrices. Question: From a pair of two subsets of data (with 9 variables each, I have two var-covar matrices for each subgroup, that differ for a treatment on one

Hello, The last weekend, the VM with CentOS 7 (kernel-3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64) was running with 2.5GB of used memory, but without users connected, and heavy services running. Three minutes after reboot, the o.s. is running with 114MB used. ?Why the 62% of memory is used if the o.s. does not have an intensive load? top sorted by memory: top - 12:55:34 up 8 days, 21:41, 1 user, load

Hi all, I'm trying to perform a nested ANOVA, in which "Rewetted" is the main factor and "Position" is a fixed factor nested in "Location". I'm interested in the effect of "Rewetting" and "Position" on the dependent variable (in this case called N), and also in the interaction between these factors. I tried finding this using this script:

Hi, LLVM 2.1-pre1 test results: Linux (SUSE) on x86 (P4) Release mode, but with assertions enabled LLVM srcdir == objdir # of expected passes 2250 # of expected failures 5 I ran the llvm-test suite on my desktop while I was also working on that PC, so don't put too much trust in the timing info. Especially during the "spiff" test the machine was swapping

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download

Hi folks, The following are initial virtio-scsi + target vhost benchmark results using multiple target LUNs per vhost and multiple virtio PCI adapters to scale the total number of virtio-scsi LUNs into a single KVM guest. The test setup is currently using 4x SCSI LUNs per vhost WWPN, with 8x virtio PCI adapters for a total of 32x 500MB ramdisk LUNs into a single guest, along with each backend

Hi folks, The following are initial virtio-scsi + target vhost benchmark results using multiple target LUNs per vhost and multiple virtio PCI adapters to scale the total number of virtio-scsi LUNs into a single KVM guest. The test setup is currently using 4x SCSI LUNs per vhost WWPN, with 8x virtio PCI adapters for a total of 32x 500MB ramdisk LUNs into a single guest, along with each backend