search for: 2.65

Hi everyone, I've been asked to run a number of Wilcoxon tests on some behavioral data (below is a sample). They want me to compare each trial to the first trial, considered the control trial. I know I can use brackets to index and select, for example, trial 1 vs. trial 4 (not exactly sure how to set that up either) but it would save me a ton of time if there was a way to do all the

Hi everyone, I've been asked to run a number of Wilcoxon tests on some behavioral data (below is a sample). They want me to compare each trial to the first trial, considered the control trial. I know I can use brackets to index and select, for example, trial 1 vs. trial 4 (not exactly sure how to set that up either) but it would save me a ton of time if there was a way to do all the

Hello I am reshaping a data.frame bids --> reshaped as shown below. I thought this should be possible with a single invocation of reshape, but the only way I came up with is reshaping subsets for each keyword and then joining them together. Does anyone have an idea how to solve this in a more elegant way? Efficiency is a concern as the datasets are very large. Is there a way to specify

I have a data frame something like: name wrist nLevel emot 1 4094 3.34 1 frustrated 2 4094 3.94 1 frustrated 3 4094 NA 1 frustrated 4 4094 3.51

Dear R helpers,   I have following input files. (Actually they are more than 10 rates but here i am considering only 2 rates to write my problem)   rate1.csv min1        max1            min2          max2          min3           max3 1.05        1.30               1.30          1.65             1.65          1.99   rate2.csv min1        max1            min2          max2          min3          

Dear all, I have been given a data something like below: Dat = "2 3 28.3 3.05 8 3 3 22.5 1.55 0 1 1 26.0 2.30 9 3 3 24.8 2.10 0 3 3 26.0 2.60 4 2 3 23.8 2.10 0 3 2 24.7 1.90 0 2 1 23.7 1.95 0 3 3 25.6 2.15 0 3 3 24.3 2.15 0 2 3 25.8 2.65 0 2 3 28.2 3.05 11 4 2 21.0 1.85 0 2 1 26.0 2.30 14 1 1 27.1 2.95 8 2 3 25.2 2.00 1 2 3 29.0 3.00 1 4 3 24.7 2.20 0 2 3 27.4 2.70 5 2 2 23.2 1.95

Dear List,   I have the following code:   x <-c(0, 13.8333333333333, 38.1666666666667, 62.1666666666667, 85.9166666666667, 108.916666666667) y <-c(1.77, 2.39, 3, 2.65, 2.62, 1.8) Interpolated <- approx(x, y,xout=0:tail(x, n=1),method="linear") plot(Interpolated)   in this code x is time in hours (cumulative), and y is a biological variable. I am using linear interpolation

I have got this error when trying to build Wine 1.1.39 in Fedora 12 Code: + autoreconf configure:4993: error: possibly undefined macro: AS_VAR_APPEND If this token and others are legitimate, please use m4_pattern_allow. See the Autoconf documentation. autoreconf: /usr/bin/autoconf failed with exit status: 1 In Fedora 12 installed autoconf-2.63.

Dear R Users,i am very new to R. I want your help on an issue regarding distance matrix and cluster analysis i had discharge data of 4 rivers(a,b,c,d) in 4 vectors each having 364 values > dput(qmu)structure(list(a = c(0.26, 0.25, 0.25, 0.25, 0.24, 0.23, 0.22, 0.21, 0.21, 0.21, 0.2, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.19, 0.18, 0.18, 0.18, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17, 0.17,

I need some help for a curious question of a friend of mine. She usually does some experiments (3-5 repeats for each exp) and then she calculates mean and standard deviation. In microsoft excel she writes something like the following sample mean sd a 1.25 0.35 b 2.65 0.65 c 3.45 0.50 She can do a vertical barplot graph just giving mean value and specifying the

I am having a series of problems using date time data that has been converted into a POSIXt and POSIXlt classes. I have hourly time series data from 1900 that has been converted from text data. I assume most of my problems come from a mis-underdanding of the POSIX class. My matrix named (aa) for this year is approx 8700 by 4. When I try to calculate the length of posit column ( which is the

Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are showing slower compile times for many tests. Ciao, Duncan. On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu wrote: > > lab-mini-03__O0-g__clang_DEV__x86_64 test results > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283?compare_to=1278&baseline=999> > > Run Order Start Time Duration >

Hi, I have fit a series of ols() models, by group, in this manner: l <- ols(y ~ rcs(x, 4)) ... where the series of 'x' values in each group is the same, however knots are not always identical between groups. The result is a table of 'coefs' derived from the ols objects, by group: group Intercept top top' top'' 1 6.864 0.01 2.241 -2.65

Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? -bw On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > Did something change with exception handling recently? A bunch of lit bots are > showing slower compile times for many tests. > > Ciao, Duncan. > > On 20/06/12 07:53, llvm-testresults at cs.uiuc.edu

Hello, I can compile metadata plugin using debian squeeze + wheezy. But build on suse enterprise server 9,10 and 11 failed. The metadata plugin require autoconf-2.65 which i too new. On the other side I can build the dovecot-2.2.4 and pigeonhole-0.4.0 plugin without problems: dovecot require autoconf-2.59 and pigeonhole does not require any specific autoconf version. I asked the authors of the

Hi Bill, > Nothing that I'm aware of has changed with EH. Is it possible to bisect the problem? I don't see any relevant LLVM changes, so I guess clang C++ compilation slowed down due to some clang changes. I'm not going to investigate this. Ciao, Duncan. > > -bw > > On Jun 20, 2012, at 12:38 AM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > >> Did

Hi R users. I have a table like that: table var A1 A2 A3 v1 41203 3.69 2.31 v2 20577 4.51 8.60 v3 20625 2.87 3.50 v4 6115 8.92 2.97 v5 3160 1.49 2.21 v6 2954 2.62 5.98 v7 4731 1.83 7.53 v8 2435 7.68 3.50 v9 2296 3.03 4.84 v10 6153 1.06 4.28 v11 3157 1.07 1.15 v12 2996 1.06 1.01 v13 6084 2.65 2.63 v14 3115 2.42

Hello everyone I appologize for my lack of experience in statistical methods. I am an R user begginer and I am running a logit model using "zelig" and "pcse" packages. I will go to the point and is that Im having problems with interpreting the results of my models.. It is really simple (I guess for the most advanced scholars) however I really dont understand how to interpret

hello, sorry for posting what may be a simple question: i do have a matrix of coordinates (positional judgments, see below) and now want to calculate and plot the corresponding error ellipse. can anyone help me with the exact steps/syntax? > xyDat X Y 1 -0.49 -2.13 2 0.91 0.48 3 0.20 -2.80 4 -0.76 -3.23 5 -0.36 2.50 6 1.38 1.24 7

Hello All, I am having a problem creating text for my forest plot using the "forestplot" function in the rmeta package. I think my problem is that I have too many columns of text, so I was wondering if there is a way to shrink my text or to change the default setting. Here is an example: #### forest_mean<- as.numeric(c(NA, 1.00, 2.00, NA, 0.75, 1.10)) forest_lower<-