Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "264k".
Did you mean:
264
2012 Apr 24
4
Simple matrix transformation question
I know this is likely very simple. I want to change a matrix that was given
to me not sorted by timestamp to sorted by timestamp. It was sorted by
CRAH_Name. There are 264k records initially. The CRAH names start at 11
and go to 98 but there are a number of missing values (CRAH_Name), total
approx. 50.
A small example of the given matrix
Time_Stamp Power CRAH_Name
4/16/2012 00:00 3.4862 11
4/16/2012 00:01 3.4862 11
4/16/2012 00:02 3.61035 11
4/16/2012 00:03 3.57215...
2011 Sep 06
2
[Bug 747] New: IPtables marked packets not being inpsected in NAT table.
...oes not read the marked packets properly. Here
is a packet counts to show this behavior.
root at europeanroller:~# iptables -t mangle -nvL PREROUTING
Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 2052 packets, 1205K bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
437 264K MARK udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
udp dpt:514 limit: avg 200/sec burst 5 MARK xset 0x2/0xffffffff
437 264K RETURN udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
udp dpt:514 limit: avg 200/sec burst 5
657 397K MARK udp --...
2006 May 22
0
smbd process grows to 25Mb resident size
...sr/local/lib/libroken.so.16.1.0
> FEA60000 256K r-x-- /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.5.4
> FEAAE000 48K rwx-- /usr/local/lib/libncurses.so.5.4
> FEAC0000 160K r-x-- /usr/local/lib/libasn1.so.6.1.0
> FEAF6000 8K rwx-- /usr/local/lib/libasn1.so.6.1.0
> FEB00000 264K r-x-- /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so.17.4.0
> FEB50000 24K rwx-- /usr/local/lib/libkrb5.so.17.4.0
> FEB60000 80K r-x-- /usr/local/lib/libgssapi.so.4.0.0
> FEB82000 16K rwx-- /usr/local/lib/libgssapi.so.4.0.0
> FEB90000 80K r-x-- /lib/nss_ldap.so.1
> FEBB2000...
2006 Nov 27
5
startx reboots my computer
...entually peaking out at:
top - 22:28:15 up 4 min, 3 users, load average: 2.54, 0.74, 0.26
Tasks: 7696 total, 2 running, 7693 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 10.5% us, 45.2% sy, 0.0% ni, 0.0% id, 43.8% wa, 0.0% hi, 0.6% si
Mem: 1024380k total, 896720k used, 127660k free, 264k buffers
Swap: 8385848k total, 1035964k used, 7349884k free, 10372k cached
***************************************************************************
with the PID numbers peaking at 12551, tasks at 7696, swap at 1-1.4GB used.
The situation then tapers back down to "nominal" with t...
2011 Sep 01
1
No buffer space available - loses network connectivity
...100% 0.52K 8694 7 34776K radix_tree_node
12420 11088 89% 0.16K 540 23 2160K vm_area_struct
5895 4185 70% 0.25K 393 15 1572K filp
4816 3355 69% 0.03K 43 112 172K size-32
2904 2810 96% 0.09K 66 44 264K sysfs_dir_cache
2058 1937 94% 0.58K 343 6 1372K proc_inode_cache
1728 1215 70% 0.02K 12 144 48K anon_vma
1650 1590 96% 0.25K 110 15 440K skbuff_head_cache
1498 1493 99% 2.00K 749 2 2996K size-2048
1050...
2011 Sep 01
0
No buffer space available - loses network connectivity
...58 100% 0.52K 8694 7 34776K radix_tree_node
12420 11088 89% 0.16K 540 23 2160K vm_area_struct
5895 4185 70% 0.25K 393 15 1572K filp
4816 3355 69% 0.03K 43 112 172K size-32
2904 2810 96% 0.09K 66 44 264K sysfs_dir_cache
2058 1937 94% 0.58K 343 6 1372K proc_inode_cache
1728 1215 70% 0.02K 12 144 48K anon_vma
1650 1590 96% 0.25K 110 15 440K skbuff_head_cache
1498 1493 99% 2.00K 749 2 2996K size-2048
1050 1032...
2009 Jan 22
2
expire plugin error
Hi,
I am using the db backend for the expire plugin and found the following
error message in the logfile:
dovecot: Jan 22 10:10:55 Error: dict: secondary db: unable to allocate
space from the buffer cache
dovecot: Jan 22 10:10:55 Error: dict: Failed to initialize dictionary
'expire'
dovecot: Jan 22 10:10:55 Error: IMAP(xxxxxxxxxx):
read(/var/dovecot/dict-server) failed: Remote
2011 May 13
27
Extremely slow zpool scrub performance
Running a zpool scrub on our production pool is showing a scrub rate
of about 400K/s. (When this pool was first set up we saw rates in the
MB/s range during a scrub).
Both zpool iostat and an iostat -Xn show lots of idle disk times, no
above average service times, no abnormally high busy percentages.
Load on the box is .59.
8 x 3GHz, 32GB ram, 96 spindles arranged into raidz zdevs on OI 147.
2010 Mar 02
3
Very unresponsive, sometimes stalling domU (5.4, x86_64)
...59 41 0 0| 80k 4320k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 108 100
0 0 48 52 0 0| 16k 208k| 126B 178B| 0 0 | 80 89
0 0 46 54 0 0| 56k 0 | 308B 178B| 0 0 | 38 68
0 0 42 58 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 178B| 0 0 | 11 11
0 0 54 45 0 0|1264k 752k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 282 428
0 0 53 47 0 0| 0 360k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 81 101
0 0 53 46 0 0| 0 576k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 141 129
0 0 38 62 0 0| 536k 88k| 126B 178B| 0 0 | 68 62
0 0 50 50 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 17...
2010 Mar 02
3
Very unresponsive, sometimes stalling domU (5.4, x86_64)
...59 41 0 0| 80k 4320k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 108 100
0 0 48 52 0 0| 16k 208k| 126B 178B| 0 0 | 80 89
0 0 46 54 0 0| 56k 0 | 308B 178B| 0 0 | 38 68
0 0 42 58 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 178B| 0 0 | 11 11
0 0 54 45 0 0|1264k 752k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 282 428
0 0 53 47 0 0| 0 360k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 81 101
0 0 53 46 0 0| 0 576k| 66B 178B| 0 0 | 141 129
0 0 38 62 0 0| 536k 88k| 126B 178B| 0 0 | 68 62
0 0 50 50 0 0| 0 0 | 66B 17...
2007 Aug 22
5
Slow concurrent actions on the same LVM logical volume
Hi 2 all !
I have problems with concurrent filesystem actions on a ocfs2
filesystem which is mounted by 2 nodes. OS=RH5ES and OCFS2=1.2.6
F.e.: If I have a LV called testlv which is mounted on /mnt on both
servers and I do a "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/test.a bs=1024
count=1000000" on server 1 and do at the same time a du -hs
/mnt/test.a it takes about 5 seconds for du -hs to execute:
270M
2010 Nov 11
8
zpool import panics
...1564 1 16K 128K 13.5K 128K 100.00 bplist
1565 1 16K 512 1.50K 512 100.00 DSL dataset next
clones
1566 1 16K 512 0 512 0.00 DSL dataset
1567 1 16K 128K 0 128K 0.00 bplist
1571 2 16K 4K 264K 156K 100.00 SPA space map
1574 1 16K 128K 13.5K 128K 100.00 bplist
1575 1 16K 512 1.50K 512 100.00 DSL dataset next
clones
1576 1 16K 512 0 512 0.00 DSL dataset
1577 1 16K 128K 0 128K 0.00 bplist...
2015 Dec 05
2
bad things happened, 4.4-rc3, nve7, virgl test server
...hub found
[ 3.305589] hub 2-1:1.0: 8 ports detected
[ 3.307750] hub 1-1:1.0: 6 ports detected
[ 3.311248] Freeing unused kernel memory: 1516K (ffffffff81d50000 -
ffffffff81ecb000)
[ 3.313794] Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 12288k
[ 3.317208] Freeing unused kernel memory: 264K (ffff8800017be000 -
ffff880001800000)
[ 3.321196] Freeing unused kernel memory: 672K (ffff880001b58000 -
ffff880001c00000)
[ 3.333082] random: systemd urandom read with 4 bits of entropy available
[ 3.337263] systemd[1]: systemd 219 running in system mode. (+PAM
+AUDIT +SELINUX +IMA -APPAR...
2008 Nov 29
24
pv_ops dom0 testing
I am trying to get a pv_ops dom0 working for testing,
but I am running into an elf_init error:
(XEN) *** LOADING DOMAIN 0 ***
(XEN) elf_init: not an ELF binary
Full output attached.
>From what I have read on the mailing lists, it seems
that it is usually a problem with either grub or a
corrupt dom0 kernel.
Attached is my kernel config (2.6.28-rc6-tip).
I followed the instructions on:
2019 Apr 30
6
Disk space and RAM requirements in docs
...les/Output/auto-module-import.m.tmp
276K build/tools/clang/test/Coverage/Output
276K build/tools/clang/test/Analysis/html_diagnostics
272K build/tools/clang/test/Analysis/html_diagnostics/relevant_lines
268K build/utils/not
268K build/tools/clang/test/Analysis/html_diagnostics/relevant_lines/Output
264K build/tools/clang/test/Modules/Output/odr_hash.cpp.tmp/Inputs
264K build/tools/clang/test/CXX/special
260K build/utils/not/CMakeFiles
260K build/tools/clang/test/Index/Output/comment-custom-block-command.cpp.tmp
256K build/utils/not/CMakeFiles/not.dir
252K build/tools/polly/lib/External/CMakeFiles/...