Displaying 17 results from an estimated 17 matches for "25.80".
Did you mean:
25.0
2003 Apr 15
1
current cvs
hi,
so after upgrade to the current cvs all of our problem disappear:-)
but we don't have time to test the ssl part...
although after I compile and install the new dovecot I stop it I do a
--------------------
find /home/*/Maildir -name '.imap*' -exec rm {} \;
find /home/*/Maildir -name 'dovecot-uidlist' -exec rm {} \;
find /home/*/Maildir -name 'msgid.cache' -exec rm
2011 Jun 11
3
rcspline.plot query
Dear all,
As I am new to the R community - although eager to advance- I would
like to pose a question to the community.
I have an SPSS file which I have imported it in R (with the read.spss
command) which conists of scale (continuous) variable "adiponectin" and
the corresponding categorical value "death" (0=No, 1=Yes). In all there
are 60 observations (among which
2004 Nov 03
2
[LLVMdev] Problems with nighttest FeatureTests
I think there is a very similar situation with the PowerPC/Mac OS X
nightly tests. Over each of the past few nights, something has been
filling up the process table, causing me to be unable to log in. The
nightly tester wrote out regression test and feature test logs
featuring hundreds of "Resource temporarily unavailable" errors from
fork(), so I assume it's the qmtest
2004 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Problems with nighttest FeatureTests
>> I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion
>> because (I believe) of an upgrade that happened on the machine (the
>> qmtest
>> binary doesn't work anymore?). Are you seeing a problem on freebsd where
>> the feature tests go into a loop? If so, can you provide us with more
>> information?
>>
make, ~ > ps -xu
2004 Nov 02
2
[LLVMdev] Problems with nighttest FeatureTests
>> > I assume you're talking about the FreeBSD run. I'm not sure what is
>> > going
>> > on
>>
>> No. You can see problem with Feature tests at
>> http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/X86/ also (see Feature Test Results
>> section )
>
> I'm not sure that I follow. The qmtest stuff isn't working on Zion
> because (I
2013 Feb 26
1
Getting the correct factor level as Dunnett control in glht()
Hello all,
I would like to do a Dunnett test in glht(). However, the factor level I
want to use as the control is not the first.
dunn1<-glht(model3, linfct = mcp(Container = "Dunnett"), alternative =
"less")
The factor container has 8 levels, so it would be nice not to manually
enter in all of the contrasts. I originally discovered glht() when
working with a glm model
2004 Nov 03
0
[LLVMdev] Problems with nighttest FeatureTests
A typo in test/Makefile was the trigger for this problem:
http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/
020216.html
John, can you please look into this bug some more and add some error
checking to the llvm-specific qmtest python modules to make this error
less severe?
Thanks!
-Brian
On Nov 3, 2004, at 10:35 AM, Brian Gaeke wrote:
>
> I think there is a very
2004 Nov 03
1
[LLVMdev] Problems with nighttest FeatureTests
Brian Gaeke wrote:
>
> A typo in test/Makefile was the trigger for this problem:
>
> http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20041101/
> 020216.html
>
> John, can you please look into this bug some more and add some error
> checking to the llvm-specific qmtest python modules to make this error
> less severe?
Does the fork bomb occur in the
2006 Mar 01
0
Specification decisions in glm and lmer
I have been reviewing GLM and LMER to sharpen up some course notes and
would like to ask for your advice.
1. Is there a test that would be used to check whether a particular
functional form--say Gaussian, Gamma, or Inverse Gaussian, is "more
appropriate" in a Generalized Linear Model? A theoretical reason to
choose one over the other is enough for me, but I've got some
skeptical
2014 Mar 19
0
[PATCH v7 10/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for KVM
This patch adds the necessary KVM specific code to allow KVM to support
the sleeping and CPU kicking operations needed by the queue spinlock PV
code.
Two KVM guests of 20 CPU cores (2 nodes) were created for performance
testing. With only one KVM guest powered on (no overcommit), the
disk workload of the AIM7 benchmark was run on both ext4 and xfs RAM
disks at 3000 users on a 3.14-rc6 based
2013 May 24
0
Problem After adding Bricks
Hello, I have run into some performance issues after adding bricks to
a 3.3.1 volume. Basically I am seeing very high CPU usage and
extremely degraded performance. I started a re-balance but stopped it
after a couple days. The logs have a lot of entries for split-brain as
well as "Non Blocking entrylks failed for". For some of the
directories on the client doing an ls will show multiple
2014 Mar 20
1
[PATCH v7 10/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for KVM
Il 19/03/2014 21:14, Waiman Long ha scritto:
> This patch adds the necessary KVM specific code to allow KVM to support
> the sleeping and CPU kicking operations needed by the queue spinlock PV
> code.
The remaining problem of this patch is that you cannot get the
generically optimal configuration: qspinlock on baremetal, PV qspinlock
on KVM/Xen, unfair qspinlock on VMware/Hyper-V. You
2014 Mar 20
1
[PATCH v7 10/11] pvqspinlock, x86: Enable qspinlock PV support for KVM
Il 19/03/2014 21:14, Waiman Long ha scritto:
> This patch adds the necessary KVM specific code to allow KVM to support
> the sleeping and CPU kicking operations needed by the queue spinlock PV
> code.
The remaining problem of this patch is that you cannot get the
generically optimal configuration: qspinlock on baremetal, PV qspinlock
on KVM/Xen, unfair qspinlock on VMware/Hyper-V. You
2007 Apr 05
4
New full text search indexer
As described earlier
(http://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2006-December/018055.html), Dovecot
nowadays has full text search indexing support in CVS HEAD.
Currently there are two backends: Lucene and Squat. Lucene's problem is
that standard IMAP SEARCH command can't be used with it without breaking
IMAP RFC. So Lucene can be used only with non-standard X-BODY-FAST and
X-TEXT-FAST search
2007 Sep 18
10
Routes
hi all,
I want to move some routing tasks out of the router and into the
controller. The goal is to make Merb feel less like mod_rewrite and
give the user more control at the controller. The new Router is
simple: it takes the path_info (not the whole request) then outputs a
controller class and some parameters from the path matching. The rest
of the routing would be done at the controller level.
2014 Mar 19
15
[PATCH v7 00/11] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support
v6->v7:
- Remove an atomic operation from the 2-task contending code
- Shorten the names of some macros
- Make the queue waiter to attempt to steal lock when unfair lock is
enabled.
- Remove lock holder kick from the PV code and fix a race condition
- Run the unfair lock & PV code on overcommitted KVM guests to collect
performance data.
v5->v6:
- Change the optimized
2014 Mar 19
15
[PATCH v7 00/11] qspinlock: a 4-byte queue spinlock with PV support
v6->v7:
- Remove an atomic operation from the 2-task contending code
- Shorten the names of some macros
- Make the queue waiter to attempt to steal lock when unfair lock is
enabled.
- Remove lock holder kick from the PV code and fix a race condition
- Run the unfair lock & PV code on overcommitted KVM guests to collect
performance data.
v5->v6:
- Change the optimized