search for: 20110110

Hi, Can you tell me what ate differences in the source code between the original Red Hat yum and the one which Centos uses for updates? Regards Peter -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110110/66610d8c/attachment-0002.html>

...sendrpid=yes trustrpid=no (and restarted Asterisk) and the line "Remote-Party-ID" does not appear in my sip debug! Please help me, Mickael. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110110/5562ee3f/attachment.htm>

...t; 2009-09-30 "20091113" "--" 2009-12-31 "20100212" "20100111" 2010-03-31 "20100517" "20100412" 2010-06-30 "20100816" "20100712" 2010-09-30 "20101112" "20101007" 2010-12-31 "20110214" "20110110" 2011-03-31 "20110513" "20110411" 2011-06-30 "20110815" "20110711" 2011-09-30 "20111115" "20111011" (actually it has about 10,00 columns) I'd like all of the strings to be formatted like 2011-11-15, 2011-10-11, etc. as a data fr...

...e queue, hoping the caller wouldn't be once again forwarded to the busy agent. Which way to implement this would you suggest or recommend ? Regards -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110110/6e633934/attachment.htm>

...loop to append one sequence after another. But am not having much success there either. Any kind of help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks and regards, Shivam structure(list("20110103", "20110104", "20110105", "20110106", "20110107", "20110110", "20110111", "20110112", "20110113", "20110114", "20110117", "20110118", "20110119", "20110120", "20110121", "20110124", "20110125", "20110127", "20110128"...

On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Rudi Ahlers <Rudi at softdux.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:49 AM, compdoc <compdoc at hotrodpc.com> wrote: >> I love realtek - the resources they use tend not to conflict with other >> cards or hardware, they don't use much cpu time, the drivers are mature, and >> they don't cost much. What could be better? There

Een ingesloten tekst met niet-gespecificeerde tekenset is gescrubt ... Naam: niet beschikbaar URL: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/attachments/20110110/596768d9/attachment.pl>

...g FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 196 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-code/attachments/20110110/65a23f55/attachment.bin>

...Now, I want use these all environment variable into /etc/asterisk/res_mysql.conf file. Is there any way to do this..?? -- Regards, Chandrakant Solanki -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110110/51355245/attachment.htm>

...06]: chan_dahdi.c:13691 dahdi_pri_error: 1 ERROR: General: Not Subscribed A google search produced no result. Any ideas would be appreciated, thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110110/e5e84d38/attachment.htm>

The FAQ mentions how to configure nut to pass the power information to HAL so that gnome-power-manager can display it, but HAL has been depreciated and removed from Ubuntu since 2007. Has nut been updated to worth with UPower instead?

Hello Everyone, I was wondering if anyone out there has successfully implemented 389 as a replacement or to support to a windows AD environment. I'm just starting to toy around with it in a few vm's and trying to get a feel for integrating the two together. So far I have the 389 up now I'm just working on connecting a dummy user to authenticate with it along with populating and

Hi Li Qingan, > Thanks for your last reply. > I have made a critical mistake when I stated my question in last email. > I built llvm in debug mode, but the NDEBUG seemed to be still defined, such that > the -debug option is not enabled. > I have restated my configuration below. you need to configure with --enable-assertions In spite of the name, NDEBUG is not related to

...k? i followed no guidelines with the above setup, it's just using my own logic. so i'd appreciate an expert advice with this. Thanks, --Roland -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110110/932cea6f/attachment-0002.html>

...em. The plan is to use 16GB or so for rpool, mirrored, then divide the rest between L2ARC and a mirrored ZIL, on 64GB SSDs. Cheers in advance Karl -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/attachments/20110110/fd0f63b8/attachment.html>

On Jan 7, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > We might want to make physical registers negative and virtuals positive, or vice versa. Then FirstVirtualRegister is 0 or 1, and we could get rid of those annoying subtractions of FirstVirtualRegister all over the virtual-register-handling passes. Since 0 is used all over the place as "invalid register" it is probably best to

Hi, OpenSSH 5.7 is almost ready for release, so we would appreciate testing on as many platforms and systems as possible. This release contains a couple of large and intrusive features and changes and quite a number of bug fixes. Snapshot releases for portable OpenSSH are available from http://www.mindrot.org/openssh_snap/ The OpenBSD version is available in CVS HEAD:

...one> (no description available) -- debconf-show failed -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: fix-64-bits-issue.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 619 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20110110/dc104f1d/attachment.diff>

I am trying to plug a USB 2 device in a USB 3 slot. Nothing is being detected in "lsusb". Is there something special I need to do? I am running centos 5.5 x86_64. I thought 3.0 was backward compatible. Nothing special about my device its an RS232 to USB device. It works in 2.0 slot. Thanks, Jerry

Hi all, Now i want to check a number (channel) online, offline or unreachable on asterisk but i don`t know to do. Can anyone help me to solve this issue. Thanks and best regard! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20110109/c193b48d/attachment.html>