search for: 20.48

I've got two set of data : 22.45 21.56 20.48 19.59 21.52 = A and 22.15 21.98 20.42 20.58 19.61 = B I perform a wilcox.test on this two set wilcox.test(A, B) and I'd this answer: Wilcoxon rank sum test data: A and B W = 12, p-value = 1 alternative hypothesis: true mu is not equal to 0 Should I interpret that there is no difference between the two sets ? -- Cordialement

Ran a bunch of variables in R and the final result of StepAIC is as below: Why are the first 5 variables kept in the stepwise result?? Are the last 4 variables finally chosen after Stepwise? Thanks Coefficients: Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|) (Intercept) 1.315e-01 2.687e-01 0.490 0.63611 Core_CPI__ 1.290e-02 7.496e-03 1.721 0.11927 GDP_change -3.482e-03 2.075e-03 -1.678 0.12767

Since upgrading from Dovecot 2.0.beta4 + patches http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/96496e1d3d12 and http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.0/rev/aefa279e2c70 to Dovecot 2.0.beta 5, I have started to see the subject error from Dovecot for SASL authentications. It doesn't happen every time, but it happens more often than not. It doesn't seem to affect Postfix's acceptance of the message.

Dear list, I want to perform a logistic regression analysis with multiple categorical predictors (i.e., a logit) on some data where there is a very definite relationship between one predicator and the response/independent variable. The problem I have is that in such a case the p value goes very high (while I as a naive newbie would expect it to crash towards 0). I'll illustrate my problem

Hello Folks, Very new to R so bear with me, running 5.2 on XP. Trying to do a zero-inflated negative binomial regression on placental scar data as dependent. Lactation, location, number of tick larvae present and mass of mouse are independents. Dataframe and attributes below: Location Lac Scars Lar Mass Lacfac 1 Tullychurry 0 0 15 13.87 0 2 Somerset 0 0 0

[From:http://www.zytor.com/mailman/options/syslinux/swdamle%40bsnl.in ] on Monday, 21sep08 hpa wrote, --------------------------------------------------------------------- I presume you used isolinux.bin (from 3.72-preX, not an older version) and not isolinux-debug.bin? (The hybrid support code doesn't fit in the debug version.)

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 9:13 AM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:17:06AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > > Previously we measured the total time and used it to calculate the rate > > of different operations. This is incorrect and hides the real > > throughput. A more useful way is to measure the time we spent in each > >

Hello, I am trying to REGISTER asterisk to a SIP server, which is listening on Port 6060 (not 5060). The sip.conf file contains register=18474201111:quintum@192.168.2.94:6060/18474201111 maxexpirey=3600 defaultexpirey=120 But the REGISTER message is sent to Port 6060, but the Request-URI still contains, 5060. This is being rejected by SIP server. REGISTER sip:192.168.2.94

The current llvm/llvm-gcc-4.2 2.6 branch passes all of the Polyhedron 2005 benchmarks built with its gfortran. The results compare as follows... Compile Command : gfortran -ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 %n.f90 -o %n benchmark gcc-4.2.4 llvm-gcc-svn llvm-gcc-2.6 llvm-gcc-2.6 at -m32 20081031 -m32 at -m32 at -m64 ac 18.30

Hi. I have 2 tables, with same dimensions (8000 x 5). Something like: tab1: V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 14.23 1.71 2.43 15.6 127 13.20 1.78 2.14 11.2 100 13.16 2.36 2.67 18.6 101 14.37 1.95 2.50 16.8 113 13.24 2.59 2.87 21.0 118 tab2: V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 1.23 1.1 2.3 1.6 17 1.20 1.8 2.4 1.2 10 1.16 2.6 2.7 1.6 11 1.37 1.5 2.0 1.8 13 1.24 2.9 2.7 2.0 18 I need generate a table of averages, the

Hello, I'm a bit new to the world of R so forgive my ignorance. I'm trying to do a zero-inflated negative binomial regression and have received an error message and i'm not sure what it means. I'm running R 2.5.1 on XP. I have just tried a really simple version of the model to see if it would run before I put all the variables in. I have attached all the variables to the

On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 02:17:06AM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote: > Previously we measured the total time and used it to calculate the rate > of different operations. This is incorrect and hides the real > throughput. A more useful way is to measure the time we spent in each > operation. > > Here is an example run with this change: > > $ ./nbdkit --foreground \ > --unix

ls -la Source folder ----------------------------********---------------------------------- root at ---:/BKP_SC//FONT# ls -la totale 2808 drwxr-sr-x 1 nobody 65533 944 giu 30 2010 . drwxr-sr-x 1 nobody 65533 1440 mar 18 2014 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody 65533 12292 apr 20 2012 :2eDS_Store drwxr-sr-x 1 nobody 65533 880 giu 30 2010 .AppleDouble -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody 65533 0 mar 5 2010

All of our Kafka clusters are fairly write-heavy. The cluster in question is our second-heaviest ? we haven?t yet upgraded the heaviest, due to the issues we?ve been experiencing in this one. Here is an iostat example from a host within the same cluster, but without the RAID check running: [root at r2k1 ~] # iostat -xdmc 1 10 Linux 3.10.0-327.13.1.el7.x86_64 (r2k1) 05/27/16 _x86_64_ (32 CPU)

Ram, ? Look inside the .AppleDouble folder and tou will find the resource forks that hold the main part of the font data. ? Not a 'problem' with netatalk, but just how netatalk works so that it can represent apple files on non-apple filesystems. ? ?If you confirm the data all matches, this will prove rsync is working properly. ? Bryan -------- Original message -------- From: Ram Ballu

Dear R Helpers, A few weeks ago I asked for some help on how to accomplish modifications to data in a set of data frames. As part of that request I mentioned that I realized that one way to accomplish my goal was to put the data frames together in a list but that I was looking for a way to do it with data frames and a loop because I "believe the better thing is to work df by df for my

I did some additional testing - I stopped Kafka on the host, and kicked off a disk check, and it ran at the expected speed overnight. I started kafka this morning, and the raid check's speed immediately dropped down to ~2000K/Sec. I then enabled the write-back cache on the drives (hdparm -W1 /dev/sd*). The raid check is now running between 100000K/Sec and 200000K/Sec, and has been for several

I?ve posted this on the forums at https://www.centos.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=47&t=57926&p=244614#p244614 - posting to the list in the hopes of getting more eyeballs on it. We have a cluster of 23 HP DL380p Gen8 hosts running Kafka. Basic specs: 2x E5-2650 128 GB RAM 12 x 4 TB 7200 RPM SATA drives connected to an HP H220 HBA Dual port 10 GB NIC The drives are configured as one large

Hi Bryan, thanks for your kind reply but it happend only with some fonts not all font file, (email with attachment is under verification by admin, so i resend this without attachment file) here i attach 2 screenshot one original folder and second backup folder, you can notice that the font .otf, .ttf, .dfont have no problem in rsync it copied as it is but the font that not show extension (Font

Hello R users, For the last few days I am struggling with the following task: my data.frame: A1 A2 A3 B1 B2 B3 58.81 53.292 54.501 13.013 17.39 19.407 56.02 56.251 54.033 20.099 13.15 10.411 55.376 53.099 57.625 13.396 21.031 13.22 58.584 53.194 54.218 13.038 16.854 19.289 55.7 55.921 53.847 19.942 13.153 9.828 55.093 52.934