search for: 1g

...that the throughput dropped from 1307.7 mb/s to 2.7 mb/s !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 My ARC_max is 3G Here is a snapshot of my arcstat output in case of high throughput --- notice the 100% hits ratio arcsz,read,hits,Hit%,miss,miss%,dhit,dh%,dmis,dm%,phit,ph%,pmis,pm%,mhit,mh%,mmis,mm%,mfug,mrug, 1G, 31M, 31M, 99,111K, 0, 28M, 99, 99K, 0, 2M, 99, 12K, 0, 1M, 98, 13K, 1, 43, 43, 1G,147K,145K, 99, 1K, 0, 14K, 99, 2, 0,131K, 99, 1K, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1G,166K,166K, 100, 0, 0, 37K,100, 0, 0,128K,100, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1G, 42K, 42K,...

Hi, Given the following, a <- rnorm(5) b <- rnorm(5) c <- rnorm(5) a.1g.scale <- scale(c(a,b,c))[1:5] b.1g.scale <- scale(c(a,b,c))[6:10] c.1g.scale <- scale(c(a,b,c))[11:15] a.2g.scale <- scale(c(a,b))[1:5] b.2g.scale <- scale(c(a,b))[6:10] c.2g.scale <- scale(c) a.3g.scale <- scale(a) b.3g.scale <- scale(b) c.3g.scale <- scale(c) I am puzz...

The guestfish prepared disks (-N option) all defaulted to 100M. This has always been too small for btrfs (so for example ‘-N fs:btrfs’ has failed for a long time), and can be too small for LVs with new LVM2 / kernel >= 4.16. This changes the default from 100M to 1G. The beginning of the 1.39 branch seems like a good time to make this change. --- fish/guestfish.pod | 14 +++++++------- generator/prepopts.ml | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/fish/guestfish.pod b/fish/guestfish.pod index bbf4...

...000 mask FE0000000 uncachable 6 base 42FE00000 mask FFFE00000 uncachable 7 base 430000000 mask FF0000000 uncachable 8 disabled 9 disabled x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106 original variable MTRRs reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 16GB, type WB reg 1, base: 16GB, range: 1GB, type WB reg 2, base: 3256MB, range: 8MB, type UC reg 3, base: 3264MB, range: 64MB, type UC reg 4, base: 3328MB, range: 256MB, type UC reg 5, base: 3584MB, range: 512MB, type UC reg 6, base: 17150MB, range: 2MB, type UC reg 7, base: 17152MB, range: 256MB, type UC total RAM covered: 16310M gran_si...

I use rsync on an SSD which is slow at writing, but very fast at reading, so it is important to me to avoid writing data. I had hoped rsync would only write changes in files when using --inplace, but it seems not: # Make a 1 GB file $ perl -e 'print "x"x1000000000' > 1g # rsync it (as expected this costs 1 GB writes) $ ./rsync-3.1.0/rsync --progress --inplace -cva 1g 1g.copy # Change the first 200 bytes inplace $ perl -e 'open(A,"+<",shift) || die; seek(A,1,1); print A "a\n"x100;' 1g.copy # rsync again $ ./rsync-3.1.0/rsync --progres...

...3G 21:12:31 190 60 31 52 28 8 97 60 32 734M 3G 21:22:31 225 58 25 57 25 0 94 58 25 873M 3G 21:32:31 206 51 24 51 24 0 24 50 24 985M 3G 21:42:31 175 43 24 43 24 0 29 42 24 1G 3G 21:52:31 162 48 29 48 29 0 54 48 29 1G 3G 22:02:31 159 55 34 54 34 0 90 55 34 1G 3G 22:12:31 164 41 25 41 24 0 61 41 25 1G 3G 22:22:31 161 40 24 40 24 0 68 40 24...

...d anything. Currently I have a Dovecot 2.0.9 with virtual users from a SQL table. Right now I'm only using global quota limits. Here is my quota setup: plugin { quota = maildir:User quota quota_rule = *:storage=3G quota_rule2 = Trash:storage=+100M quota_rule3 = Archive:storage=+1G quota_rule4 = Archive/2013:storage=+1G quota_rule5 = Junk:ignore } According to the documentation this should allow the Archive folder to have an additional 1G in it that is not counted toward the global 3G. However I have users who have 2G in the Archive folder, and about 1G elsewhere....

Everytime i start wine i get this error: Code: Warning: Memory above 0x80000000 doesn't seem to be accessible. Wine requires a 3G/1G user/kernel memory split to work properly. Any help?

...st generation time: 0.306 seconds File list transfer time: 0.000 seconds Total bytes sent: 13016666532 Total bytes received: 18628384 sent 13016666532 bytes received 18628384 bytes 892125.72 bytes/sec total size is 15400460674 speedup is 1.18 Source Files: -rwx------ 1 root wheel 1G Sep 22 02:19 psa.dump.full.monthly.aa -rwx------ 1 root wheel 1G Sep 22 02:33 psa.dump.full.monthly.ab -rwx------ 1 root wheel 1G Sep 22 02:47 psa.dump.full.monthly.ac -rwx------ 1 root wheel 1G Sep 22 03:00 psa.dump.full.monthly.ad -rwx------ 1 root wh...

Hi all, I find that SPEC cpu2k benchmark will always fail (9 of 10 times) for ia32 smp hvm guest with 4 vcpus. I used 4 users parameter to run cpu2k and assign 1G memory for the guest, but it will always fail when running 164.zip case and report warnings as the attachments. However, cpu2k could be run successfully in native linux and xenU guest with the same configuration. Anyone has ideas about this? Thank you. Best regards, Fan _______________________...

...num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 0G Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 256M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 0G Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 512M num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: -256M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 1G num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 0G Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: *BAD*gran_size: 64K chunk_size: 2G num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: -1G Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_size: 128K num_reg: 8 lose cover RAM: 4865M Apr 11 17:25:36 kernel: gran_size: 128K chunk_s...

Hello find /etc -size -1G should return all files less than 1Giga byte in /etc, but return a list of empty file (size=0) find /etc -size -2G work fine and return all the files This works the same on my fedora11 and my centos 5 ! Did I miss something or is it a bug ? Regards -- Alain Spineux...

Hi I just started with RMySQL. I have a database with roughly 12 millions rows/records and 8 columns/fields. From all 12 millions of records I want to import 3 fields only. The fields are specified as:id int(11), group char(15), measurement float(4,2). Why does this take > 1G RAM? I run R on suse linux, with 1G RAM and with the code below it even fills the whole 1G of swap. I just don't understand how 12e6 * 3 can fill such a huge range of RAM? Thanks for clarification and potential solutions. ## my code library(RMySQL) drv <- dbDriver("MySQL") ch...

Hello, I have found, that ocfs2 is very slow when doing I/O operation without cache. See a simple test: ng-vvv1:~# dd if=/data/verejna/dd-1G bs=1k | dd of=/dev/null 1048576+0 records in 1048576+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 395.183 s, 2.7 MB/s 2097152+0 records in 2097152+0 records out 1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 395.184 s, 2.7 MB/s The underlying block device is quite quick: ng-vvv1:~# dd if=/dev/mapper/3600a0...

All, I am trying to understand better how you give an interface a more descriptive name and get it all working without a reboot, if possible. We have 1G and 10G interfaces, and I?m trying to use names like 1G-internal, 1G-external, 10G-private, etc. When I boot up, it?s all fine, but if I add one I?m not sure if there is a way to avoid the reboot? For example, I added the 10G interface names this week. Specifically, is there a way to change the n...

...000 mask FFC000000 uncachable 6 base 0AB000000 mask FFF000000 uncachable 7 base 44F800000 mask FFF800000 uncachable 8 disabled 9 disabled x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106 original variable MTRRs reg 0, base: 0GB, range: 16GB, type WB reg 1, base: 16GB, range: 1GB, type WB reg 2, base: 17GB, range: 256MB, type WB reg 3, base: 3GB, range: 1GB, type UC reg 4, base: 2816MB, range: 256MB, type UC reg 5, base: 2752MB, range: 64MB, type UC reg 6, base: 2736MB, range: 16MB, type UC reg 7, base: 17656MB, range: 8MB, type UC total RAM covered: 16296M gran_size: 64K...

Why not? Thanks? -Xin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

...11, 2012 at 04:45:23AM +0200, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > "陳韋任 (Wei-Ren Chen)" <chenwj at iis.sinica.edu.tw> writes: > > > I have been stuck on compiling LLVM/Clang (r163485) on pandaboard which has > > following configuration, > > > > - Ubuntu 11.04 + 1G Mem + 1G Swap + 32G SD card > > - GCC 4.5.2 > > - GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.21.0.20110327) 1.11 > > > > The compiling process stucks on linking llc, I am pretty surprised on > > this. Anyone has similar issue or any idea? Thanks! > > Are you buildi...

Hey, the following line in fstab used to work just fine for my /tmp: tmpfs /tmp tmpfs rw,size=1g,mode=1777 0 0 But since I upgraded to 8.2-PRERELEASE, /tmp will soon run out of space (usually after leaving the box overnight). % df /tmp Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on tmpfs 12 12 0 100% /tmp Yes, what you see here, is not "stuff" fill...

Hi all, I have been stuck on compiling LLVM/Clang (r163485) on pandaboard which has following configuration, - Ubuntu 11.04 + 1G Mem + 1G Swap + 32G SD card - GCC 4.5.2 - GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Ubuntu 2.21.0.20110327) 1.11 The compiling process stucks on linking llc, I am pretty surprised on this. Anyone has similar issue or any idea? Thanks! Regards, chenwj -- Wei-Ren Chen (陳韋任) Computer Systems Lab, Institute o...