Li, Xin
2011-May-30 13:32 UTC
[Xen-devel] doesn''t Xen itself use 1g super page to make the direct 1:1 mapping ?
Why not? Thanks? -Xin _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Jan Beulich
2011-May-30 13:57 UTC
Re: [Xen-devel] doesn''t Xen itself use 1g super page to make the direct 1:1 mapping ?
>>> On 30.05.11 at 15:32, "Li, Xin" <xin.li@intel.com> wrote: > Why not?It does (or at least is supposed to do so), and has been for quite a long time. What made you think is doesn''t? Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Li, Xin
2011-May-30 14:01 UTC
RE: [Xen-devel] doesn''t Xen itself use 1g super page to make the direct 1:1 mapping ?
Then we need to update __spurious_page_fault to include 1g super page case. Thanks! -Xin> -----Original Message----- > From: Jan Beulich [mailto:JBeulich@novell.com] > Sent: Monday, May 30, 2011 9:58 PM > To: Li, Xin > Cc: xen-devel; Keir Fraser > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] doesn''t Xen itself use 1g super page to make the direct 1:1 > mapping ? > > >>> On 30.05.11 at 15:32, "Li, Xin" <xin.li@intel.com> wrote: > > Why not? > > It does (or at least is supposed to do so), and has been for quite a > long time. What made you think is doesn''t? > > Jan_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Reasonably Related Threads
- [bug] ''VT-d 1G super page'' feature is blocked
- EFER in HVM guests
- [PATCH] CPUID level 0x00000007:0 (ebx) is word 9, instead of word 7
- [PATCH] x86: adjust reserved bit page fault handling
- [PATCH] VT-d: make remap_entry_to_msi_msg() return consistent message