search for: 160mb

Hi all, We have done several speed tests on a qcow2 Linux Image to test how fast tar-in with a big tarball can be. Virtio seems to be active, and we get transfers in a range from 100-160MB/sec, independent of the disk speed on the host. For example we had a 20 core host system with 900MB for serial writing and 350MB for mixed read/write on the native filesystem. We've expected a faster tar-in for qcow2 there than on a small test system with some slow disks and only two cores. B...

...the eventual migration of NFS mounted home dirs to glusterfs in order to enhance data safety and availability (hence AFR). My problem is that for two typical use scenarios, the performance is not acceptable. My two "testcases" are a cp -a of a source tree including git repository of appr. 160MB from the local disk to the glusterfs filesystem ("CP-A") and a make statement in this source tree (in the remote glusterfs filesystem) when everything is up to date ("MAKE"); i.e., after make has checked all 800 or so source files it tells you that there is nothing to do. I am a...

Hello For a special task whit win98 i need to boot this sytem in a image of 160mb (created with virtualpc 5.2 and dskread) with memdisk, but the system shows me an error whit the master boot record and switchs in dos compatibility mode. Sorry for my english and i know that is an error out of linux. Thanks. _________________________________________________________________ MSN...

I''m looking for a virtual private server to run a RoR site accessing a database on a different machine. This is a small application - basically a form to add records, and a few summary screens. What are the minimal requirements for a vps? Thanks. -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Is rsync speed limited to 160MB/sec read speeds due to the chunk read size? Or, are we seeing just a coincidence and the limitation is somewhere else? Rsync (single process) is used to locally copy files from one raid partition to another and we noticed rsync's read speed is limited. Whether I setup an rsync between two rai...

.... When I searched around I discovered that I wasn't the only one experiencing this, but I didn't find a solution. I experimented a little, and I hope someone can suggest a solution. First my server : SuSE 8.1, with Samba 2.2.5 (comes with the distribution). From a WinME-client I uploaded a 160Mb file to the samba-server. This took about 45 minutes. Downloading the file took about 1 minute. Some would say, look at the configuration of your NIC/hub/switch, but after I did some more trials I think that is not the source : From my samba-server, I downloaded that 160MB file from the WinME-mach...

I've recently installed the latest Debian Linux for powerpc onto and old iMac (version A) the original iMac with a 233Mhz G3 processor and 160MB of sdram. The debian install went smooth and so the the apt-get install of Asterisk 1.4.21 It appears to have no functioning zaptel or ztdummy module. Is because of hardware? or is it because whoever built the package didn't include a full working zaptel with ztdummy? In other words is zap...

Wayne, Transferring an 8gb file using rsync between a network (10GbE) mounted filesystem and local disk. rsync-2.6.9 - 88-95 MB/sec rsync-3.0.6 - 62-72 MB/sec rsync-3.1.0 - 86-90 MB/sec Doing a cp of the file yields 140-160MB/sec. It appears the IO code improvements in 3.1 have definitely made a difference over the 3.0 code base. Greg

...s anyone else experiencing what seems to be a memory leak with Ices? I can have icecast up and running with WinAmp streaming to it from my '98 box for days at a time with no problem. As soon as I start Ices I'll launch top to watch and my free mem starts dropping -fast-. Starting from about 160MB free, in 4-5 hours I have 2MB free with Ices crashed and the memory unrecovered which sends me to the wonderful world of init 6. I thought this was maybe that I was just running ices 0.2.2 so I switched to ices 0.1.0 and have the same symptom. I'm using: -PII 233MHz 224MB RAM ~400MB S...

...speed. I am really not concerned about my Rails performance, as my app runs sufficiently fast, is very simple and will not be used by more than a handful of people (not at all at one moment). I do care about memory, though, because I have to fit RoR, Apache+mod_perl and the mysql server inside 160MB of RAM. I just slimmed mysql way down in terms of memory use, so I think I will be OK to keep using WEBrick. WEBrick+Rails is roughly 25MB of memory use, excluding shared libs. If I can reduce that by putting it inside an FCGI process, great, then I can give some memory back to mysql for db cac...

Hi all, Is it possible to install (and run) CentOS-3 with only 160 MB of RAM?? Have I put special params to boot it?? Thank you very much __________________________________________________ Correo Yahoo! Espacio para todos tus mensajes, antivirus y antispam ?gratis! Reg?strate ya - http://correo.espanol.yahoo.com/

...ith a file (900MB in size) that has around 10 million records (in particular FASTQ records). I am able to read in the file as an object of BStringSet. When I start to manipulate the data, after almost 4 hours, I get the error message as Error: cannot allocate vector of size X.0 Mb (where X was once 160MB and then 180MB). The R version used is 2.11.1. I am not sure how to check if this is 64-bit or not so that I can use >4GB of RAM. I typed 'version' at the R prompt and see this: platform x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu arch x86_64...

...same Ruby - 1.8.5, same mongrel versions - 1.0.1, same mongrel_cluster - 1.0.2). Oh, and the data on the staging one is a clone of the production one. On the production box, pretty much immediately (and I''m talking about within one or two requests), the mongrels climb up to about 150-160MB. One the staging server, even when I''m hammering it with a benchmarking suite (have tried with httperf, and bench and crawl) the mongrels sit comfortably at about 60MB each. Here''s some stats from top: Production server: top - 08:38:43 up 22 days, 13:21, 1 user, load avera...

On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Jack Moffitt wrote: > > I'm running RedHat 7.2 (kernel 2.4.17) on a PII 300. I'm using Liveice > > with XMMS. I had no problem broadcasting with Shoutcast and Winamp back > > before I switched over to Linux. I'd love to get going on broadcasting... > > but Icecast refusing to open is a problem. > > Did you use the hostname parameter in

At 05:19 PM 2/4/2002 -0500, Gary Major wrote: >Using Icecast 1.3.11 and Ices 0.2.2. Have compiled Ices with the optimize >flags defined. Using PII 266 - 160MB, RH 7.1 with default kernel (2.4.7 i >think) > >Situation that I have is interesting: Odd, I have them both running as background processes together with no problem (then though I'm running FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE). And I didn't compile with optimize flags. CPU utilization did hove...

We got a remote Oracle 10g R2 standby running on OCFS2. Initial when we started the standby, read I/O was < 5MB/sec on average. Since then it has grown to over 40MB/sec (longer average, it peaks much higher). Here is a graph showing this: http://www.alameda.net/~ulf/dbphx01.png We also have a local standby running (on EXT3) which is not showing the same symptom. I am trying to find where all

I am trying to build asterisk-0.9.0 on 533MHz 160MB Redhat Linux 9.0 machine. I have followed the instructions to build asterisk. Building zaptel and libpri seemed to go well (lots of messages but nothing that indicated an error) However, when I do the make clean ; make install for asterisk-0.9.0 after running for sometime I get the following...

...n't even know what information I should include here that might help, but here's what I have running at the moment: OS/Hardware Config: OS : CentOS 5.0 (2.6.16-8.1.6 Linux kernel) x86_64 with latest updates CPU: AMD Athlon 64 x2 4200+ M/B: ECS NFORCE4M-A ram: 2GB OCZ DDR2 800 (PC6400) hds: 160MB + 120MB Maxtor PATA UDMA-133 (160 is the boot drive) sds: 300GB Seagate SATA-150/300 (/boot and / are here) 320Gb WD SATA-150/300 vid: geFORCE7100gs (nVidia) PCI-E x16 lpr: Minolta QMS PagePro 1100 laser printer on /dev/lp0 mod: Agere Systems 56k WinModem (Lucent) nic: onboard (mobo-nvidia)...

...g what seems to be a memory > leak with Ices? I can have icecast up and running with > WinAmp streaming to it from my '98 box for days at a > time with no problem. As soon as I start Ices I'll > launch top to watch and my free mem starts dropping > -fast-. Starting from about 160MB free, in 4-5 hours I > have 2MB free with Ices crashed and the memory > unrecovered which sends me to the wonderful world of > init 6. > I thought this was maybe that I was just running > ices 0.2.2 so I switched to ices 0.1.0 and have the > same symptom. > I'm using:...

...lysis shows that majority of this time is spend inserting line table entries into the middle of a vector, which means it should be possible to fix this with a smarter implementation). As far as object file sizes go, in the resulting clang binary (2.3GB), the new .debug_names section takes up about 160MB (7%), which isn't negligible, but considering that it supersedes the .debug_pubnames/.debug_pubtypes tables whose combined size is 490MB (21% of the binary), switching to this table (and dropping the other two) will have a positive impact on the binary size. Further reductions can be made by me...