search for: 100mb

I'm hoping someone can shed some light on this. I'm using a Linux box in my house as a NAS, so that I can make backups, move large files, etc. The problem is that, whenever I try to move/copy a file larger than 100MB or so off of the linux machine to my Windows machine, I get "Specified network name is no longer available" on the Windows machine and the transfer aborts. I've noticed some interesting tidbits: 1 - It's not a hard size limit. I can usually transfer 50-60MB files, and rarely succ...

...so that eth0->xenbr0 and eth1->xenbr1 Each of the two RHEL5.1 guests uses one of the interfaces and this is verified at the switch by seeing the unique MAC addresses. If I do a crude test from one guest over nfs, dd if=/dev/zero of=/nfs/test bs=32768 count=32768 This yields almost always 95-100MB/sec When I run two simultaneously, I cannot seem to get above 25MB/sec from each. It starts off with a large burst like each can do 100MB/sec, but then in a couple of seconds, tapers off to the 15-40MB/sec until the dd finishes. Things I have tried (installed on the host and the guests) net.cor...

GeorgePannell at aol.com wrote: > >Hi, I am a new wine user and I have been able to get ie7 running on my >Macbook but I cannot set the memory allocation for temp files under the >browser setting. If I set to 100MB it gives message that setting needs to be >between 8 and 8. If I put in 8 MB in the settings window the message does not >reappear but it also does not retain even the 8MB, it defaults back to 0. >Any ideas how to fix this problem. > This is the second posting on this subject....

Hi, In a setup where OpenVSwitch is used with GRE tunels on top of an interface provided by tinc, I'm experiencing significant performance degradation problems (from 100Mb/s down to 1Mb/s in the worst case) and I'm not sure how to fix this. The manifestation of the problem is, from the user point of view, iperf reports ~100Mb/s and rsync reports ~1Mb/s: $ iperf -c 91.224.149.132 ------------------------------------------------------------ Client connecting to 91...

...| 14 +++++++------- generator/prepopts.ml | 28 ++++++++++++++-------------- 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) diff --git a/fish/guestfish.pod b/fish/guestfish.pod index bbf43aad5..4f24006b8 100644 --- a/fish/guestfish.pod +++ b/fish/guestfish.pod @@ -120,8 +120,8 @@ Create a 100MB disk containing an ext2-formatted partition: =head2 Start with a prepared disk -An alternate way to create a 100MB disk called F<test1.img> containing -a single ext2-formatted partition: +Create a 1G disk called F<test1.img> containing a single +ext2-formatted partition: guestf...

...advised to try CIFS, which I did. I didn't make much difference and I gave up and switched to NFS. Recently, however, I noticed something odd. If I move files separately across my smbfs mount, things go MUCH faster. Here's an example. I mount my remote Samba share to /mnt/samba. I copy a 100mb file from my local drive to /mnt/samba (sending it via SMBFS to the other machine). Here's what I get: europium Temp # time cp file-100mb /mnt/samba real 1m2.621s user 0m0.001s sys 0m0.399s Next, I open a second terminal. This time, I'm going to copy two files to the same shar...

Hello, I have installed CentOS 5 onto a server this afternoon using NFS. The NFS 'server' has a 100Mb/full-duplex interface, the server I installed CentOS on to has 4 x 100Mb interfaces. However, the installation was painfully slow to start with, and by using ctrl-alt-f2/f4/f5 I could see that contact with the NFS server was intermitently failing. Soon after some of the packages had installed the &...

I am Happy To announce that USOR now allows for user registration aswell as the demo account. you can register here (http://usor.lerao.com/auth/register) or login with the demo account here (http://usor.lerao.com/auth/login) Each user gets 100mb of storage space, and web access to their Sites directory at http://homepages.usor.com/username/ I have the bandwidth for all users throttled to 100gb per month to try and keep my hosting fees down. User Space On Rails (USOR) is an open source project currently under the GPL. More information at...

I have an asterisk process that is consuming over 100mb (according to "top"). "Show channels" says "167 active channels and 53 active calls." It's an old install -- 1.2.7.1, but it has custom code that needs to be updated before moving to a more recent release. I'm assuming that 100mb is indicative of a memory l...

Hi, I have samba-3.0.28a crosscompiled and running on a MIPS platform. The development system has about 150MB of free RAM after system bootup and no swap space. The system also has an USB interface, to which an external USB hard disk is connected. When I try to transfer huge files above (100MB) from a client on to the USB hard disk, I find that the page cache eats up almost about 100MB and occasionally the system runs out of memory. I even tried tweaking the /proc/sys/vm settings with the following values, but it did not help. /proc/sys/vm/dirty_background_ratio = 2 /proc/sys/vm/dirty_...

I'm using Samba & smbfs to make directories on a Linux file server available across a switched Gigabit network. Unfortunately, when mounting the shares to another Linux system with smbfs, the performance is terrible. To test the setup, I created both a 100mb and 650mb file and transferred them with ftp, smbclient, and smbfs (mounted share). I also used iperf to send each file, just out of curiosity. Here's what I'm seeing: iperf: 100mb - 1.7 seconds (59 MB/s) 650mb - 10.8 seconds (60 MB/s) FTP: 100mb - 2.17 seconds (47 MB/s)...

Yes, I get more than 30MB/s performance. The benchmark I use (NetBench) is essentially CPU bound, such that a faster processor = faster performance. With a very fast hardware config (dual 3.2GHz processors), I've been able to hit around 100MB/s. Changing the RAM or other attributes does not buy me much, it seems that processor power is the bottleneck (at least in my case). When doing your speed test, monitor the CPU utilization for smbd, and see if it's at 100% of your linux server. -Marc > -----Original Message----- > F...

...the?Theora player, the video will be compressed so the file size is smaller and??it will be faster to load. The quality of the video should remain the same.??For example, some 2 hour 16:9 Widescreen High definition 1080p videos are??4Gigabytes in size, so Theora should compress this 4GB video into 100MB??without losing any quality.?Now for those that found this funny because?you think it's impossible, well all i can say?is new technologies are coming out all the time. 100 years ago they didn't even have cellphones, and now we do.?Just this year, researchers have found a way to store 100 DV...

On 10/10/2016 5:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro > X8DTE-F motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. > The eth0 ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable > to a Cisco Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). > > These servers keep coming up at 100baseT rather

On 10/10/2016 11:21 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 10/10/2016 09:31 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> >> oh. > > Yeah, the entire "net-tools" package is deprecated. I tend to forget > which of the two (ethtool or mii-tool) is in that set. > > # Avoid using any of these: > $ rpm -ql net-tools /bin/dnsdomainname /bin/domainname /bin/hostname /bin/netstat

Hi, On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:03 AM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > I've got a pair of identical CentOS 6.7 servers, with SuperMicro X8DTE-F > motherboards, these have 2 each Intel 82574L ethernet ports. The eth0 > ports are plugged in with 10' runs of brand new cat 5e cable to a Cisco > Nexxus 9000 switch (provided by the data center). > >

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:26 AM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: > > the switch ports kept going offline on us. Not finding anything exactly like this... Closest I could find is CSCuu81949 Open a Cisco TAC case and upload a Nexus 9000 tech support (`tac-pac`) to investigate further. Is "port security" enabled on these ports? Does this port double as a

On 10/13/2016 5:57 PM, Steven Tardy wrote: >> On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:26 AM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >> >> the switch ports kept going offline on us. > Not finding anything exactly like this... Closest I could find is CSCuu81949 > > Open a Cisco TAC case and upload a Nexus 9000 tech support (`tac-pac`) to investigate further. > > Is

...performance is expected over GigE, with Samba 3 as the server and XP64 as the client? I havn't been able to find any current benchmarks at all. http://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2010-June/156708.html talks about the same configuration, and suggests that the protocol should be able to break 100MB/sec. (Unfortunately, the poster disappeared without following up.) Focusing on read throughput (Samba to XP64), I see about the same performance as he did, around 50 MB/sec; with HTTP 97.7M/sec. Modern HDDs can regularly hit 100MB/sec, so halving throughput for large file copies is painful. I...

How small can an Asterisk system be, in terms of disk space utilized? I am looking for just asterisk, with mysql, postgresql, or sqlite, with PHP and Python. After finishing the build and removing the tools, how small can the whole system be? 100Mb, 200Mb? Can packages be used to build the whole system, like using debs and rpms alone? /vfclists