search for: 112k

...he sparse array, as implemented upstream in 1.9.8: read: IOPS=103k, BW=401MiB/s (420MB/s)(46.0GiB/120002msec) write: IOPS=103k, BW=401MiB/s (420MB/s)(46.0GiB/120002msec) (2) I moved the locking to around calls to the sparse array code, and changed the thread model to parallel: read: IOPS=112k, BW=437MiB/s (458MB/s)(51.2GiB/120001msec) write: IOPS=112k, BW=437MiB/s (458MB/s)(51.2GiB/120001msec) (3) I reimplemented the memory plugin using a simple malloc, which is how it used to be in nbdkit <= 1.5.8: read: IOPS=133k, BW=518MiB/s (544MB/s)(60.7GiB/120002msec) write: IOPS=133k,...

How does one get mountpoints working. I have tried time and time to get seperate mountpoints going (eg 56k and 112k on /56 and /112) but no dice. Do I need to start 2 instances of icecast? Any pointers are appreciated. -Paul Slinski --- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ icecast project homepage: http://www.icecast.org/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'icecast-reque...

...ables -t mangle -L PREROUTING -v shows following: Chain PREROUTING (policy ACCEPT 16M packets, 4534M bytes) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 159K 53M CONNMARK all -- any any anywhere anywhere CONNMARK set 0x0 1090 112K all -- any any anywhere anywhere CONNMARK match 0x5 22 1843 all -- any any anywhere anywhere CONNMARK match 0x6 i don''t know if it is correct, so please tell me if it is normal. thanks a lot Matis...

...24kbps is probably the pratical limit for 56k modems. 56k modems might > >> be able to get a 32kbps stream but only under optimal conditions. > > > >I believe he said the outgoing stream was two 128k ISDN lines, which > >from my ISDN memory I remember as actually having a 112k throughput (the > >other channel being used for signalling, etc). Since you can only push > >packets out one at a time with a single tcp connection (i think) 128 is > >definately not going to make it out, even if the one possible listener > >could receive data that fast. &g...

'm trying to install Internet Explorer on my Linux Mint using Winetricks, but it doesn't seem to work. After the downloading of IS8 completes, this is what I get: Code: 100%[++++++++++++++++++++++++++++==========>] 16,883,056 112K/s in 45s 2011-01-10 14:00:25 (95.0 KB/s) - `IE8-WindowsXP-x86-ENU.exe' saved [16883056/16883056] fixme:clusapi:GetNodeClusterState ((null),0x32ec1c,0) stub! ------------------------------------------------------ To start ie8, use the command wine 'C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer...

.../task/3662/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory du: cannot access `proc/3662/fd/4': No such file or directory du: cannot access `proc/3662/fdinfo/4': No such file or directory 14G var 1.8G usr 278M lib 77M boot 31M etc 27M lib64 15M sbin 7.8M bin 188K dev 112K root Why *df -h* is reporting 24G used? Where the space did go? How I can fix this?

...: Guessing netmask 255.0.0.0 IP-Config: Complete: device=eth0, addr=1.2.3.4, mask=255.0.0.0, gw=255.255.255.255, host=1.2.3.4, domain=, nis-domain=(none), bootserver=1.2.3.4, rootserver=1.2.3.4, rootpath= VFS: Mounted root (iso9660 filesystem) readonly. Freeing unused kernel memory: 112k freed Warning: unable to open an initial console. Kernel panic - not syncing: No init found. Try passing init= option to kernel. any help. _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...processor. Using tsc for high-res timesource Dentry cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 3, 32768 bytes) vmalloc area: c4800000-fbff9000, maxmem 34000000 Memory: 54352k/65536k available (1652k kernel code, 11100k reserved, 442k data, 112k init, 0k highmem) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K CPU: L2 cache: 512K CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz stepping 09 Enabling fast FPU save and rest...

...rk over a modem. > > I think 24kbps is probably the pratical limit for 56k modems. 56k modems might > be able to get a 32kbps stream but only under optimal conditions. I believe he said the outgoing stream was two 128k ISDN lines, which from my ISDN memory I remember as actually having a 112k throughput (the other channel being used for signalling, etc). Since you can only push packets out one at a time with a single tcp connection (i think) 128 is definately not going to make it out, even if the one possible listener could receive data that fast. So a lower bitrate is most certainly...

...n you don?t get the results you want. Instead, I?d recommend just explicitly listing the most likely pigs: /usr, /var, /home, and /etc. > 14G var > 1.8G usr > 278M lib > 77M boot > 31M etc > 27M lib64 > 15M sbin > 7.8M bin > 188K dev > 112K root I see about 16 GiB. > Why *df -h* is reporting 24G used? Where the space did go? How I can fix > this? 24 - 16 = 8, which sounds suspiciously like the size of a swap file. What does mount say?

...; >> I think 24kbps is probably the pratical limit for 56k modems. 56k modems might >> be able to get a 32kbps stream but only under optimal conditions. > >I believe he said the outgoing stream was two 128k ISDN lines, which >from my ISDN memory I remember as actually having a 112k throughput (the >other channel being used for signalling, etc). Since you can only push >packets out one at a time with a single tcp connection (i think) 128 is >definately not going to make it out, even if the one possible listener >could receive data that fast. > >So a lower bi...

...atical limit for 56k modems. 56k > modems might > > >> be able to get a 32kbps stream but only under optimal conditions. > > > > > >I believe he said the outgoing stream was two 128k ISDN lines, which > > >from my ISDN memory I remember as actually having a 112k throughput (the > > >other channel being used for signalling, etc). Since you can only push > > >packets out one at a time with a single tcp connection (i think) 128 is > > >definately not going to make it out, even if the one possible listener > > >could receiv...

> www.shoutcast.com). And - at least with MP3 - there is a *big* > difference in sound quality between 96k & 128k. You might want to compare different encoders. From what I have read, lame and its derivatives are great for 128 and higher, and the fraunhofer is good for sub-128, and Xing is always the worst. YMMV of course. Mark --- >8 ---- List archives:

Hello, I've noticed that when I try to reencode VBR mp3s to broadcast @128k , they are not being reencoded at all. They stream as normal VBRs I am unable to reproduce this at lower bitrates (56-112k i've specifically tested and all work fine). It does reencode all non-VBR mp3s appropriately to 128k... Any ideas why VBR reencoding would suddenly stop working at 128k? I've attempted to hunt through the source files of both ices and lame, but lack the knowledge to fully understand much...

..., domain=, nis-domain=(none), bootserver=1.2.3.4, rootserver=1.2.3.4, rootpath= kjournald starting. Commit interval 5 seconds EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode. VFS: Mounted root (ext3 filesystem) readonly. Freeing unused kernel memory: 112k freed request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c request_module: runaway loop modprobe binfmt-464c ---...

Hey. I've noticed a severe lack of recent news updates on xiph.org and vorbis.com. Of course, I'm sure you can't name an exact date for version 1.0 due to development schedules and what not, but it'd be handy to have an easily accessible list somewhere of what major chunks of coding remain before Version 1.0's release. Personally, I'm quite content with the format as is.

On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 05:26:07PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote: > On 1/4/19 4:08 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > First thing to say is that I need to do a *lot* more testing on this, > > so this is just an early peek. In particular, although it passed > > ‘make check && make check-valgrind’ I have *not* tested it against a > > multi-conn-aware client such as the

I''m having troubles with my outbound VOIP connection. I''m convinced that I don''t have QOS/traffic shaping configured properly in my shorewall linux firewall, which serves as my Asterisk VOIP server and Internet router/gateway. I don''t have a separate router box. I''ve been using VOIP for about a year now, but just recently realized that I need to

...ture. In general Mongrel 0.3.12.1 behaves more consistently compared to past releases when given random data or maliciously formatted data. The main changes are related to how IO is processed and how the HTTP parser rejects "bad" input. What the parser now blocks is: * Any header over 112k. * Any query string over 10k. * Any header field value over 80k. * Any header field name over 256 bytes. * Any request URI (the file part, not the whole thing) greater than 512 bytes. As soon as these conditions are detected the client is disconnected immediately and a log message is printed out l...

...r IDE inverse scan order. Local APIC disabled by BIOS -- reenabling. Found and enabled local APIC! Initializing CPU#0 Detected 399.067 MHz processor. Console: colour VGA+ 80x25 Calibrating delay loop... 796.26 BogoMIPS Memory: 289236k/294912k available (1289k kernel code, 5288k reserved, 442k data, 112k init, 0k highmem) Dentry cache hash table entries: 65536 (order: 7, 524288 bytes) Inode cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 6, 262144 bytes) Mount-cache hash table entries: 8192 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Buffer-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Page-cache hash table entries:...