search for: 10368

<http://www.apress.com/book/bookDisplay.html?bID=10368> Came across this as a stub page browsing Amazon UK. This is good news! I''m surprised it hasn''t been discussed on the list before. Was Chad keeping it a secret? I hope it will have plenty of BDD theory. I''m still waiting for that magic book I can give to so...

...k -- Executing AGI("SIP/3210-084eaa80", "agi://127.0.0.1:4577/call_log") in new stack -- AGI Script agi://127.0.0.1:4577/call_log completed, returning 0 -- Executing Dial("SIP/3210-084eaa80", "SIP/3213)|30|to") in new stack Feb 3 12:42:25 WARNING[10368]: chan_sip.c:1994 create_addr: No such host: 3213) Feb 3 12:42:25 NOTICE[10368]: app_dial.c:1056 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'SIP' (cause 3 - No route to destination) == Everyone is busy/congested at this time (1:0/0/1) **sip.conf*** ************** i have 4 extensio...

Hi all, It's been a long time, and I'm probably going to kill myself, but I want to try it anyway. Bug 10368 [1] tells me that ConstantExpr shouldn't automatically fold, and that this is source of many problems (most notably with traps) and code duplication. However, I'm a bit lost... There seem to be constant folding in many places like ConstantExpr::get*() uses lib/Analysis/ConstantFolding.cpp...

Dear all: When I have more variables than units, say a 195*10896 matrix which has 10896 variables and 195 samples. prcomp will give only 195 principal components. I checked in the help, but there is no explanation that why this happen. Can we get more than 195 PCs for this case? Thank you very much. Best! Alan Aug-12-2005

...unctions. But this does not work for ConstantExpr, which the global initializer uses. Should we make ConstantExpr to support some kind of side-effect free intrinsic function calls? If we want to work on such a patch, what are the things we should look out for? http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10368 seems also express this desire. Thanks. Yuan ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribut...

Hi all, After 6 months away, I'm looking for some low impact, unimportant area of LLVM to get back in sync with the code base. Is anyone looking at this bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10368 Is it still valid/desired? -- cheers, --renato http://systemcall.org/

...s not work for ConstantExpr, which the global initializer uses. > > Should we make ConstantExpr to support some kind of side-effect free intrinsic function calls? If we want to work on such a patch, what are the things we should look out for? > > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10368 seems also express this desire. > That PR is still accurate as to the direction I think ConstantExprs should go. What specifically does this target-specific constant need to look like? -Chris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.l...

...15368 2 analog,snd_als4000 snd_pcm_oss 47008 0 snd_mixer_oss 17152 1 snd_pcm_oss tsdev 7232 0 snd_pcm 82696 4 snd_ca0106,snd_ac97_codec,snd_als4000,snd_pcm_oss snd_page_alloc 10376 2 snd_ca0106,snd_pcm snd_opl3_lib 10368 1 snd_als4000 mousedev 11424 0 snd_timer 23812 2 snd_pcm,snd_opl3_lib snd_hwdep 9248 1 snd_opl3_lib snd_mpu401_uart 7424 1 snd_als4000 snd_rawmidi 24224 1 snd_mpu401_uart snd_seq_device 8332 2 snd_opl3_lib,snd_rawmidi snd...

...Module Size Used by md5 4992 1 ipv6 260352 16 hw_random 6548 0 pciehp 97540 0 shpchp 101124 0 pci_hotplug 13060 2 pciehp,shpchp e1000 86788 0 evdev 10368 0 And output from /proc/interrupts immediately after loading the wctdm module: CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3 0: 3791068 10 10 10 IO-APIC-edge timer 1: 7 1 0 0 IO-APIC-edge i8042 9: 0 0...

...though :) -Chris On Apr 14, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > Hi all, > > After 6 months away, I'm looking for some low impact, unimportant area > of LLVM to get back in sync with the code base. > > Is anyone looking at this bug: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10368 > > Is it still valid/desired? > > -- > cheers, > --renato > > http://systemcall.org/ > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/...

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > It's been a long time, and I'm probably going to kill myself, but I > want to try it anyway. > > Bug 10368 [1] tells me that ConstantExpr shouldn't automatically fold, > and that this is source of many problems (most notably with traps) and > code duplication. > > However, I'm a bit lost... There seem to be constant folding in many places like > > ConstantExpr::get*() uses >...

On Fri, 29 Jun 2012 23:10:39 +0100 Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote: > Hi all, > > It's been a long time, and I'm probably going to kill myself, but I > want to try it anyway. > > Bug 10368 [1] tells me that ConstantExpr shouldn't automatically fold, > and that this is source of many problems (most notably with traps) and > code duplication. > > However, I'm a bit lost... There seem to be constant folding in many > places like > > ConstantExpr::get*() us...

Hi everybody I''d like to create an upload form that let''s you upload a zip file, and after the uploading process it decompresses the zip file to a specific directory. Is this possible? And how? Thanks a lot for help. Joshua -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

Asterisk 1.2.5 is now available for download on the ftp. See the ChangeLog for details about what has changed. ftp://ftp.digium.com/pub/telephony/asterisk/ As mentioned in the release announcement for Zaptel 1.2.4, our releases now contain some extra files. The Asterisk release is available as asterisk-1.2.5.tar.gz. However, there is also a patch against the previous release as an option for a

Good evening all, Are there any folks out there running Asterisk on Athlon64 platforms with 64-bit operating systems? I have a couple of new asterisk servers to build up this week and I'm debating whether to order some Athlon64 CPUs and boards for them. I usually install Gentoo onto the boxes, so any experiences (or pitfalls) that folks running Gentoo + Asterisk on Athlon64 platforms would

Asterisk 1.2.5 is now available for download on the ftp. See the ChangeLog for details about what has changed. ftp://ftp.digium.com/pub/telephony/asterisk/ As mentioned in the release announcement for Zaptel 1.2.4, our releases now contain some extra files. The Asterisk release is available as asterisk-1.2.5.tar.gz. However, there is also a patch against the previous release as an option for a

...88 0 via_rhine 34568 0 mii 14464 3 8139too,8139cp,via_rhine floppy 75816 0 fbcon 49792 0 tileblit 11264 1 fbcon font 17024 1 fbcon bitblit 14464 1 fbcon softcursor 10368 1 bitblit lscpi reads 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M890CE/K8N890CE [Chrome 9] (rev 11) Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device 7253 Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 64, IRQ 16 Memory at c0000000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] M...

...4 0". Right now "i8* getelementptr ([1 x i8]* @glbl), i32 0, i32 0" is different from "i8* getelement ([1 x i8]* @glbl), i33 0, i33 0", and there's an infinite number of these. We should canonicalize these harder and only produce one Value* here. Nick > > Bug 10368 [1] tells me that ConstantExpr shouldn't automatically fold, > and that this is source of many problems (most notably with traps) and > code duplication. > > However, I'm a bit lost... There seem to be constant folding in many places like > > ConstantExpr::get*() uses >...

Currently, you're allowed to form a constant of aggregate type using any number of other constants you like. This makes scanning the instructions of the IR needlessly complex when looking for references to constants. There is no need to support this degree of complexity in the IR. We could require that for anything but 'zeroinitializer' you cannot write a constant of aggregate

...unctions. But this does not work for ConstantExpr, which the global initializer uses. Should we make ConstantExpr to support some kind of side-effect free intrinsic function calls? If we want to work on such a patch, what are the things we should look out for? http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10368 seems also express this desire. That PR is still accurate as to the direction I think ConstantExprs should go. What specifically does this target-specific constant need to look like? -Chris ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email message...