Hi all, After 6 months away, I'm looking for some low impact, unimportant area of LLVM to get back in sync with the code base. Is anyone looking at this bug: llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10368 Is it still valid/desired? -- cheers, --renato systemcall.org
Yes, that's definitely still desired. I wouldn't say it is "low impact" though :) -Chris On Apr 14, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Renato Golin wrote:> Hi all, > > After 6 months away, I'm looking for some low impact, unimportant area > of LLVM to get back in sync with the code base. > > Is anyone looking at this bug: llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=10368 > > Is it still valid/desired? > > -- > cheers, > --renato > > systemcall.org > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
On 14 April 2012 16:59, Chris Lattner <clattner at apple.com> wrote:> I wouldn't say it is "low impact" though :)Yeah, I know. ;) I'm looking for something that is not required for next-release schedule or for the next big-thing to happen. Something which I can take my time to code and that can take months to finish, but it's reasonably self contained. I remember being bitten by the automatic folding when building front-ends, so I thought that it'd be a good self-contained project. If no one else is planning on working on that for the next months, I'll put my name in and see how it goes from here. Of course, if you have a better idea, I'm all ears... ;) cheers, --renato