search for: 1000g

I am trying to use an ICW-1000G wireless handset connected to an asterisk server remotely The user is working from an offsite location and it appears that the device is not sending out keep-alives or stun. The manufacture is not being of assistance at all. I am wondering if anyone has worked with these units or has any i...

...local users and NTLM auth. > > Get ACL then set with smbcacls. Thanks so much. It works with a real VM, and fails on the Docker image. The difference in the returned ACL, being the default created by a root user uploaded with smbclient is: (VM) O:S-1-5-21-453318200-1757343522-2642056891-1000G:S-1-5-21- 453318200-1757343522-2642056891-513D:(A;;FA;;;S-1-5-21-453318200- 1757343522-2642056891-1000)(A;;0x1200a9;;;S-1-5-21-453318200- 1757343522-2642056891-513)(A;;0x1200a9;;;WD) (Docker) O:S-1-5-21-1647377796-1824335532-2881770359-1000G:S-1-22-2- 0D:(A;;FA;;;S-1-5-21-1647377796-1824335532-288...

...et ACL then set with smbcacls. > > Thanks so much. It works with a real VM, and fails on the Docker > image. > > The difference in the returned ACL, being the default created by a > root user uploaded with smbclient is: > > (VM) O:S-1-5-21-453318200-1757343522-2642056891-1000G:S-1-5-21- > 453318200-1757343522-2642056891-513D:(A;;FA;;;S-1-5-21-453318200- > 1757343522-2642056891-1000)(A;;0x1200a9;;;S-1-5-21-453318200- > 1757343522-2642056891-513)(A;;0x1200a9;;;WD) Hi Andrew, just a question, you said that you were setting up a standalone server, so how have you g...

The default blocksize is 128K. If you are using mirrors, then each block on disk will be 128K whenever possible. But if you''re using raidzN with a capacity of M disks (M disks useful capacity + N disks redundancy) then the block size on each individual disk will be 128K / M. Right? This is one of the reasons the raidzN resilver code is inefficient. Since you end up waiting for the

On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:42:53AM +1200, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >After 23 years answering questions here, I figure it might be time for >me to ask one. > >As mentioned here: >https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba-technical/2024-May/138969.html I >am working with a client to improve a Go SMB client library. > >They want to manipulate ACLs on SMB, which is a very

...file is: Error in checkSlotAssignment(object, name, value) : assignment of an object of class "NULL" is not valid for slot "data" in an object of class "databel"; is(value, "externalptr") is not TRUE The screen out put is: impute2mach(geno = "chr22_1000G.gen",info = "chr22_info", sample = "1000G.sample",machbase = "chr22_test", maketext = F, order_info = c(2:7), skip_info = 0) Options in effect: --infile = chr22_1000G.gen --outfile = ./tmp841924 --skiprows = OFF --skipcol...

...ed it for certain areas in storm peaks and icecrown. you won't have to complete an extensive chain in order to learn it anymore. there's a cold weather flying trainer in krasus' landing in dalaran who will gladly wow gold (http://www.lightinthegame.com) teach you this ability for a mere 1000g (depending on your reputation)are left to ponder when they can expect to receive their money. in some cases? delivery might take long enough to leave the player wondering why they just didn farm for the money on their own. ed hardy siteregardless of the gold vending website you select? be sure that...

You will get better long- term performance if you don't fill the filesystems more than about 70% full. Above 90% you are permanently fragmenting the filesystem (depends on total size and workload also). There is the secondary issue that mke2fs can lay out the filesystem better if it is done right at the start rather than resize2fs doing it in small increments. I think as long as you are

I''d like to replace/upgrade two 500GB disks in RaidZ2 vdev with 1TB disks, but I have some preliminary questions/concerns before trying ''zfs replace dpool ?'' Will ZFS permit this replacement? Will ZFS use the extra space in a heterogeneous RaidZ2 vdev, or is the size limited by the smallest disk in the vdev? Thanks in advance, Vizzini The system is currently running

Hello. So, LVM is cool, having different partitions for different stuff is cool, and of course Ext4 is cool and *reliable*. So, we create some logical partitions and put ext4 on them, reserving LVM space for growing those partitions or even making new ones later. The thing is, I would like to keep every filesystem as small as it can be, but without degrading the performance too

I''m not sure if this is a problem with the iscsitarget or zfs. I''d greatly appreciate it if it gets moved to the proper list. Well I''m just about out of ideas on what might be wrong.. Quick history: I installed OS 2008.05 when it was SNV_86 to try out ZFS with VMWare. Found out that multilun''s were being treated as multipaths so waited till SNV_94 came out to