search for: 020980

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "020980".

Did you mean: 02080
2015 Mar 26
2
MATE desktop dependency?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > > > ------------ Original Message ------------ >> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500 >> From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com> >> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> >> Cc: >> Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?
2015 Mar 26
2
MATE desktop dependency?
...t;. >> >> So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a >> system today would be??? > > Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it > the other day: > > <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html> > > I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and > epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine, > though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in > -testing may have moved to epel base by now. > It's no...
2015 Mar 26
0
MATE desktop dependency?
...ed. It looks to be in "cr". > > So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a > system today would be??? Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it the other day: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html> I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine, though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in -testing may have moved to epel base by now.
2015 Mar 26
0
MATE desktop dependency?
...... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a >>> system today would be??? >> >> Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it >> the other day: >> >> <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html> >> >> I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and >> epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine, >> though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in >> -testing may have moved to epel base by no...
2015 Mar 27
5
Not getting updates?
I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit 'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no difference. I have noticed that I do have some updated packages (like httpd) that are from February and appear to be the most recent based on the mirrors, but every mirror I hit I see no