Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "020980".
Did you mean:
02080
2015 Mar 26
2
MATE desktop dependency?
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 4:27 PM, Richard
<lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote:
>
>
> ------------ Original Message ------------
>> Date: Thursday, March 26, 2015 16:18:45 -0500
>> From: Les Mikesell <lesmikesell at gmail.com>
>> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org>
>> Cc:
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] MATE desktop dependency?
2015 Mar 26
2
MATE desktop dependency?
...t;.
>>
>> So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a
>> system today would be???
>
> Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it
> the other day:
>
> <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html>
>
> I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and
> epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine,
> though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in
> -testing may have moved to epel base by now.
>
It's no...
2015 Mar 26
0
MATE desktop dependency?
...ed. It looks to be in "cr".
>
> So... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a
> system today would be???
Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it
the other day:
<http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html>
I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and
epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine,
though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in
-testing may have moved to epel base by now.
2015 Mar 26
0
MATE desktop dependency?
...... the right thing to do for someone who just wants to update a
>>> system today would be???
>>
>> Probably depends on your view of CR. Here's the announcement for it
>> the other day:
>>
>> <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2015-March/020980.html>
>>
>> I updated a machine the other day with a combination of CR and
>> epel-testing (key MATE things were there still) and it seems fine,
>> though I haven't tested it heavily yet. The epel things that were in
>> -testing may have moved to epel base by no...
2015 Mar 27
5
Not getting updates?
I have no excludes in yum.conf. But I noticed something odd in the
CentOS-Base.repo file. The [updates] section didn't have an explicit
'enabled=1' in it. Though, when I added it in, it made no difference. I
have noticed that I do have some updated packages (like httpd) that are
from February and appear to be the most recent based on the mirrors, but
every mirror I hit I see no