search for: 0.324

Good morning, suppose the following: m <- round(matrix(rnorm(16), ncol=4), 3) a <- rev(c(0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1)) rownames(m) <- a colnames(m) <- c("0.25,0.75", "0.4,0.6", "0.1,0.9", "0.4,0.9") m 0.25,0.75 0.4,0.6 0.1,0.9 0.4,0.9 0.1 1.034 -0.119 -1.213 0.619 0.05 0.035 1.074 0.525 1.671 0.025 -1.687 0.960

Hi, I'm estimating a loglogistic aft (accelerated failure time) model, just a simple plain vanilla one (without time dependent covariates), I'm comparing the results that I obtain between aftreg (eha package) and survreg(surv package). If I don't use any covariate the results are identical , if I add covariates all the coefficients are the same until a precision of 10^4 or 10^-5 except

Dear R users I have a big matrix like 6021 1188 790 290 1174 1015 1990 6613 6288 100714 6021 1 0.658 0.688 0.474 0.262 0.163 0.137 0.32 0.252 0.206 1188 0.658 1 0.917 0.245 0.331 0.122 0.148 0.194 0.168 0.171 790 0.688 0.917 1 0.243 0.31 0.122 0.15 0.19 0.171 0.174 290 0.474

I am using R dixon.test in order to perform Q test for detection of outliers. The p-values for high Q values are consistent with the table in Rorabacher, D.B. (1991) http://www.flworkshop.com/sscs/dixon_test.pdf, but it seems that small Q-values get problematic p-values. For example: dixon.test(c(0.324,0.5,1,1.324),two.sided=T) Q = 0.324, p-value = 1

Hi there In the course of my diploma thesis in climatology I have encountered a difficult R-Problem that I cannot solve. I want to fill R-Objects (whose names should depend on j) with numbers at the i-th position. The resulting Objects should be something like: RQuadratStep1, RQuadratStep2, RQuadratStep3 ... filled with Elements like c(0.324, 0.456, 0.657 ...) Below is a short version of

Hello all, I am trying to minimize a function which contains a double integral, using "nlminb" for the minimization and "adapt" for the integral. The integral is over two variables (thita and radiusb) and the 3 free parameters I want to derive from the minimization are counts0, index and radius_eff. I have used both tasks in the past successfully but this is the first time

Dear R-helpers, In my dataset I have two continuous variable (A and B) and one factor. I'm investigating the regression between the two variables usign the command lm(A ~ B, ...) but now I want to know the regression coefficient (r2) of A vs. B for every factors. I know that I can obtain this information with excel, but the factor have 68 levels...maybe [r] have a useful command. Thanks,

# Your mailer is set to "none" (default on Windows), # hence we cannot send the bug report directly from R. # Please copy the bug report (after finishing it) to # your favorite email program and send it to # # r-bugs@biostat.ku.dk # ###################################################### I stumbled on this error while doing a classroom demonstration. The error is reproducible,

Dear All, I like to simulate a physiologically based pharmacokinetics model using R but am having a problem with the daspk routine. The same problem has been implemented in Berkeley madonna and Winbugs so that I know that it is working. However, with daspk it is not, and the numbers are everywhere! Please see the following and let me know if I am missing something... Thanks a lot in advance,

Hi, I want to fit multiple cox models using the coxph() function. To do this, I use a for-loop and save the relevant results in a separate matrix. In the example below, only two models are fitted (my actual matrix has many more columns), one gives a warning message, while the other does not. Right now, I see all the warning message(s) after the for-loop is completed but have no idea which model

Hi all I am trying to generate a normal unbalanced data to estimate the coefficients of LM, LMM, GLM, and GLMM and their standard errors. Also, I am trying to estimate the variance components and their standard errors. Further, I am trying to use the likelihood ratio test to test H0: sigma^2_b = 0 (random effects variance component), and the t-test to test H0:mu=0 (intercept of the model Yij = mu

Hello, I am fitting a Poisson mixed effects model. I have the number of eggs (Eggs) laid by a quail and looking at the effect of dosage of a chemical (Dose) in the study. I have counts of eggs laid by week of the study, so I am including the week number (Week) as a random effect. I'm using the lme4 package. I have, > mod1 <- lmer(Eggs~Dose + (1|Week),family=poisson) >

I am trying to fit a non linear mixed effect model but I also want to do a post hoc comparison. My data is binary and consist of recording mice track prints on plates plates in plots that submited to one of 4 different treatments (fruits and vegetation complexity manipulated for two levels each. The design is random blocks repeated measures with presence or absence of track prints as a response

Hi r-help, I use lavaan:sem() for structural equation modelling with latent variables. Below is a reproducible example (the code requires a working installation of lavaan) where the latent variable criminality is in focus. Besides criminality in general, I am specifically interested one of the manifest variables that make up the latent variable criminality, namely fire.setting. My question is:

Hi r-users,   I would like to extract the data that match.  Attached is my data: I'm interested in matchind the value in column 'intg' with value in column 'rand_no' > cbind(z=z,intg=dd,rand_no = rr)             z  intg rand_no    [1,]  0.00 0.000   0.001    [2,]  0.01 0.000   0.002    [3,]  0.02 0.000   0.002    [4,]  0.03 0.000   0.003    [5,]  0.04 0.000   0.003    [6,] 

Hello, I did a cross-validation using cvlm from DAAG package but wasn't sure how to assess the result. Does this result means my model is a good model? I understand that the overall ms is the mean of sum of squares. But is 0.0987 a good number? The response (i.e. gailRel5yr) has min,1st Quantile, median, mean and 3rd Quantile, and max as follows: (0.462, 0.628, 0.806, 0.896, 1.000, 2.400) ?

Dear R helpers, I have been using the loadings function from the multiv library and I get the typical output (see below). When I try to export these results to a file using a write.table() I get the following error message "Error in as.data.frame.default(x[[i]], optional = TRUE) : can't coerce loadings into a data.frame" Any idea why write.table is doing that and any

Dear R-help This is a follow-up to my previous post here: http://groups.google.com/group/r-help-archive/browse_thread/thread/d9b6f87ce06a9fb7/e9be30a4688f239c?lnk=gst&q=dobomode#e9be30a4688f239c I am working on developing an open-source automated system for running batch-regressions on very large datasets. In my previous post, I posed the question of obtaining VIF's from the output of

I'm a week-old R user, and have become stuck trying to create usable CSV outputs for post-processing. I am using the package Rioja, which provides small datasets of results. I am running several analyses in a loop and iteratively adding the results to a *list* ("combined"). Within each iteration I use the following: > combined[[i]] <- performance(fit) With two iterations I

Hello, not understanding the output of prcomp, I reduce the number of components and the output continues to show cumulative 100% of the variance explained, which can't be the case dropping from 8 components to 3. How do i get the output in terms of the cumulative % of the total variance, so when i go from total solution of 8 (8 variables in the data set), to a reduced number of